09.07.2015 Views

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A New Lease <strong>of</strong> Lifebecause it does not affect the freeholder’s potential premiumincome. Third, it does not require valuations, so is a simpler andcheaper process for <strong>lease</strong>holders and tribunals alike.RTM will work better if <strong>lease</strong>holders fully understand it beforeapplying, the application process is made easier and availableto more <strong>lease</strong>holders and there are mechanisms in place for<strong>lease</strong>holder governance once the RTM is granted.Expanding awareness <strong>of</strong> responsibility and rights is crucial. Thesummary <strong>of</strong> rights and obligations – a statutory instrument ensuringthat rights are included with service charges – should be extendedto ensure that <strong>lease</strong>holders are aware <strong>of</strong> RTM. Similar informationabout RTM and enfranchisement should be included in annualaccounts.The two main practical barriers for taking the RTM are fear <strong>of</strong>the unknown and difficulties in gathering a sufficient number <strong>of</strong>qualifying tenants. It is particularly complicated to get enoughqualifying tenants when individuals rent their properties becausethe people actually living in a property will not be eligible to supportan RTM application. To make it easier for developments withabsent buy-to-let owners, <strong>lease</strong>holders should be able to requestthat freeholders forward a statement <strong>of</strong> an RTM application to all<strong>lease</strong>holders in return for a fixed administration fee.Another barrier is that <strong>lease</strong>holders must go to a tribunal if the lessordisputes their RTM claim which can be based on a technicality or anincorrectly completed form. This can allow unscrupulous freeholdersto oppose an application in the hope that the costs <strong>of</strong> going to an LVTwill deter <strong>lease</strong>holders from pursuing their application. As stated inthe LVT section <strong>of</strong> Chapter 5, any freeholder objecting to an RTMapplication should give their grounds <strong>of</strong> objection within a specifiedperiod <strong>of</strong> time. This would make <strong>lease</strong>holders aware <strong>of</strong> whetherthey could amend their application and reapply and would reducethe power asymmetries which facilitate brinkmanship. Shifting theonus onto the freeholder to show that a 20C order should be servedwould also help to reduce brinkmanship.In specific cases where developments are not eligible for theRTM – such as flats above shops – it could be possible to allow<strong>lease</strong>holders to go to an LVT to make a case for special permissionto assume control <strong>of</strong> management.Government should also consider whether lighter controls onsection 20 consultation could be applied to self-managed blocks.65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!