09.07.2015 Views

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

A new lease of life: - CentreForum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A New Lease <strong>of</strong> LifeThe tribunal found the fees to be “inappropriate” anddetermined what it felt were reasonable management fees inthe circumstances. The difference between the actual chargeslevied and those deemed reasonable are listed below.Table 1: Discrpency between actual and tribunal chargesYearInitial servicechargeTribual approved‘reasonable’ charge2004 £548 £330 40%2005 £630 £340 46%2006 £633 £350 45%Overcharging<strong>of</strong> actual chargeCase Study 4: Retirement apartments 62Having finished his working <strong>life</strong>, Frank Gadd purchased atwo bedroom retirement property in Hampshire. He used asolicitor to oversee the purchase <strong>of</strong> the maisonette whichwas one <strong>of</strong> four within the development. Soon however,his <strong>life</strong> became “grim”, as annual service charges reached£4,400. Although he wanted to challenge the costs at an LVT,the other three <strong>lease</strong>holders did not want to go through thestress and costs <strong>of</strong> pursuing the case to a tribunal.Instead, to cut their losses, the <strong>lease</strong>holders decided to buythe freehold to their property. Mr Gadd hired a solicitor whostated that his agreement was heavily slanted in favour <strong>of</strong>the freeholder, who also happened to be connected to theproperty’s managing agent. Mr Gadd had been unaware <strong>of</strong>both <strong>of</strong> these facts after the initial conveyancing process.Eventually the four <strong>lease</strong>holders made an <strong>of</strong>fer to buy thefreehold, which the freeholder rejected, demandeding a farhigher price. Exasperated and keen to avoid additional costs<strong>of</strong> going to an LVT, the <strong>lease</strong>holders relented and agreed topay the price requested.Having enfranchised, Mr Gadd’s service charges have nowdropped from £4,400 to just £200 a year. Mr Gadd’s experienceillustrates that there is a lack <strong>of</strong> transparency when managingagents are linked to freeholders, and that the LVT is too higha hurdle for those in the most vulnerable positions.62 Case study from Patrick Collinson, ‘Peverel property management faces tenantrebellion over service’, The Guardian, 12 February 2011, and reproduced anddeveloped following authors’ interview with Mr Gadd.36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!