10.07.2015 Views

Associations and the Exercise of Democratic ... - Citizenship DRC

Associations and the Exercise of Democratic ... - Citizenship DRC

Associations and the Exercise of Democratic ... - Citizenship DRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IDS WORKING PAPER 285It is striking that, from this base-line <strong>of</strong> common problem salience <strong>and</strong> attribution<strong>of</strong> responsibility, citizens in <strong>the</strong> two cities have quite different patterns <strong>of</strong> civilrelations. Differences in <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> active citizens <strong>and</strong> relations reveal importantdifferences in <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> citizenship in each city, <strong>and</strong> in particular differentdegrees <strong>of</strong> equality with government agents. São Paulo has a clear single pattern<strong>of</strong> citizens-government relations – that is, individuals are most likely to have directrelations to government. A third <strong>of</strong> active citizens in <strong>the</strong> city have direct relations.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, a fifth, or 20 per cent, <strong>of</strong> active citizens have contentious relations. Incontrast, <strong>the</strong> high level <strong>of</strong> detached relations (a quarter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population) <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>mixed relations (almost half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total) suggests that active citizens in Mexico Cityenjoy, relative to São Paulo, less equality. That individuals in Mexico City, <strong>the</strong> seat<strong>of</strong> national government, are more likely to have detached than direct relations isremarkable <strong>and</strong> suggests that a substantial share <strong>of</strong> its residents have difficultymobilising government action, or have given-up on mobilising governmentaltoge<strong>the</strong>r.There is also a strong contrast in <strong>the</strong> share, <strong>and</strong> composition, <strong>of</strong> mixed relations. InSão Paulo mixed relations represent 34 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total, <strong>and</strong> most includedirect as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relations. In <strong>the</strong> Mexican capital almost half <strong>the</strong> populationhave mixed relations to government (46 per cent), <strong>the</strong> large majority <strong>of</strong> whichinclude detached. This suggests that <strong>the</strong> civil dimension <strong>of</strong> citizenship is poorlyinstitutionalised in Mexico City, particularly when compared to São Paulo. Citizensare forced to combine multiple types <strong>of</strong> relations to address <strong>the</strong>ir concerns. Evencitizens who have direct relations to government tend to combine <strong>the</strong>se with oneor more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three types <strong>of</strong> relations. Again, Mexico City residentsattribute primary responsibility to government for issues such as urban services,public order, <strong>and</strong> health care, in much <strong>the</strong> same way as São Paulo residents, <strong>and</strong>have no ideological or normative preference for community action.Figure 4.2 Percentage <strong>of</strong> active citizens, by type <strong>of</strong> civil relations togovernmentNote: Percentage <strong>of</strong> Active Citizens – São Paulo n=464; Mexico City n=73326

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!