10.07.2015 Views

Associations and the Exercise of Democratic ... - Citizenship DRC

Associations and the Exercise of Democratic ... - Citizenship DRC

Associations and the Exercise of Democratic ... - Citizenship DRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IDS WORKING PAPER 285for São Paulo: those with some associational relation (treated) <strong>and</strong> those withoutany (control group). The variables are those that were used to generate probability<strong>of</strong> associational participation. This model differs from those used previously. Themeans are shown for <strong>the</strong> two groups first from <strong>the</strong> data as it is, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n aftersome observations have been discarded because <strong>the</strong>y could not be matched. Thep-values show that after observations are matched, in only <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>variables does <strong>the</strong> mean income in second category differ statistically. For all o<strong>the</strong>rvariables <strong>the</strong> means cannot be distinguished between <strong>the</strong> treated <strong>and</strong> controlmatched groups. A similar table for Mexico was constructed <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> results weresimilar.Table B.7 São Paulo – covariates summary before <strong>and</strong> after matchingMean %reduct t-testVariable Sample Treated Control %bias bias t p>|t|edb<strong>and</strong>4 Unmatched 0.3125 0.19817 26.4 4.28 0.000Matched 0.3125 0.27174 9.4 64.3 1.09 0.276edb<strong>and</strong>1 Unmatched 0.0462 0.14081 -32.9 -4.81 0.000Matched 0.0462 0.05707 -3.8 88.5 -0.60 0.551gender Unmatched 0.49728 0.60365 -21.5 -3.40 0.001Matched 0.49728 0.4375 12.1 43.8 1.46 0.145incb<strong>and</strong>1 Unmatched 0.11413 0.22555 -30.0 -4.52 0.000Matched 0.11413 0.10326 2.9 90.2 0.42 0.671incb<strong>and</strong>2 Unmatched 0.52989 0.57106 -8.3 -1.31 0.192Matched 0.52989 0.63043 -20.2 -144.2 -2.49 0.013incb<strong>and</strong>3 Unmatched 0.23641 0.16428 18.1 2.92 0.004Matched 0.23641 0.22283 3.4 81.2 0.39 0.695relig1 Unmatched 0.2663 0.20991 13.3 2.12 0.034Matched 0.2663 0.26359 0.6 95.2 0.07 0.940regdummy_6 Unmatched 0.06793 0.09387 -9.5 -1.46 0.144Matched 0.06793 0.08152 -5.0 47.6 -0.63 0.530If <strong>the</strong> matched control <strong>and</strong> treated groups are equally active <strong>the</strong>n associationalimpact on being active is essentially very small or negligible. We next show that <strong>the</strong>propensities to be active for <strong>the</strong> treated <strong>and</strong> control groups are different. We notethat propensity to be active remains different when pairs are matched by similarcharacteristics. In fact, <strong>the</strong> difference in being active is widened for <strong>the</strong>corresponding groups.50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!