10.07.2015 Views

directed-energy-weapons

directed-energy-weapons

directed-energy-weapons

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

also the weapon system. Such as approach offers sensor-to-shooter-to-target timelines that could be measured in seconds.In addition, it will allow <strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong> systems to contribute to the campaign for information dominance.Even in the near-term, <strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong> <strong>weapons</strong> could change the face of air combat. Airborne laser <strong>weapons</strong> willenable those who possess them to dominate absolutely the airspace within the range of their beams. Directed-<strong>energy</strong><strong>weapons</strong> can engage ballistic missiles, SAMs, and virtually any airborne platform. The current airborne <strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong>technology is limited with respect to power and number of shots available per aircraft sortie. However, current systemscould be improved by a factor of ten over the next decade. 59 This would provide a next-generation ABL with amagazine of more than 100 shots. A 100KW solid-state laser could be deployed on small, stealthy UCAVs providinga nearly undetectable capability to achieve air dominance. Laser or HPM <strong>weapons</strong> would also provide an activedefense of aircraft against heat-seeking SAMs. A similar ground-based capability could be used in either mobile orfixed deployments to defend airfields against the threat of short-range, man-portable SAMs.In addition to employing <strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong> <strong>weapons</strong> against airborne SAMs, <strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong> <strong>weapons</strong> hold forth thepromise in the near-term for major improvements in SEAD capabilities. Directed-<strong>energy</strong> <strong>weapons</strong> will be able to rapidlyrespond to attacks, locating and attacking even highly mobile SAM systems. HPM <strong>weapons</strong> could greatlyimprove anti-radiation attack capabilities and, most significantly, defeat efforts by an air-defense system to survive byturning off electronic systems. Depending on the size of the country and the robustness of its air-defense system, a<strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong> armed force could achieve air dominance within days or at worst a few weeks.Directed-<strong>energy</strong> <strong>weapons</strong> systems could contribute significantly to efforts by the United States to dissuade potentialadversaries or proliferators from seeking to acquire a range of advanced military hardware. For example, <strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong>missile defenses, whether airborne or in space, raise the bar to any would-be missile proliferator. Directed-<strong>energy</strong>systems can provide a highly effective boost-phase defense. In addition, while the initial expense associated withdeploying <strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong>-based missile defenses are likely to be high, the marginal costs for increasing the capabilityof such a system are low. Thus, a <strong>directed</strong>-<strong>energy</strong> missile-defense capability can achieve a cost-effectiveness advantageover missile proliferation or even countermeasure deployments. The mere capability to deploy <strong>directed</strong> <strong>energy</strong> in spacecould serve as a powerful disincentive to would-be proliferators or to any desire on the part of Russia or China toengage in a strategic arms race with the United States.U.S. counter-proliferation strategy has focused, of late, on the potential requirement to preempt the efforts by proliferatorsto acquire or deploy <strong>weapons</strong> of mass destruction and their means of delivery. Directed-<strong>energy</strong> <strong>weapons</strong> couldcontribute significantly to preemption operations. HPM <strong>weapons</strong>, in particular, would be useful in attacking WMDfacilities that are buried, hardened or co-located with civilian populations or infrastructure.Directed-<strong>energy</strong> <strong>weapons</strong>, primarily HPM but in some instances lasers too, could greatly enhance the ability of U.S.forces to conduct precise, effects-based operations. Directed-<strong>energy</strong> <strong>weapons</strong> can address one of the most problematicasymmetric strategies potential adversaries might pursue: the use of civilian populations as shields. Already, laserguidance systems permit the precise delivery of explosive ordinance against targets in urban environments. Directed<strong>energy</strong><strong>weapons</strong> would allow strikes against a wide range of targets co-located with civilian infrastructure or evenshielded by the presence of noncombatants. Virtually any electronic system can be attacked with HPM <strong>weapons</strong> withoutdoing direct harm to nearby civilians.34 The Military Uses and National-Security Implications of Directed-Energy Weapons

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!