10.07.2015 Views

ANALYSIS OF THE LASER MARKING TECHNOLOGIES - Revtn.ro

ANALYSIS OF THE LASER MARKING TECHNOLOGIES - Revtn.ro

ANALYSIS OF THE LASER MARKING TECHNOLOGIES - Revtn.ro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nonconventional Technologies Review – no.4/ 2008Table 1 Laser marking technologiesP<strong>ro</strong>cess Schema MechanismVaporizationMaterial removal mainlyby vaporizationThin layersmaterialremovalCarbonisationor colorationSurface modifyby materialfusionThin layers materialremoval by cont<strong>ro</strong>lledvaporisation, changingthe colour of the underlayersColour changing byphoto-thermal or photochemicalreactionsDestruction of materialsby py<strong>ro</strong>lyze reactionthat leads to irregularstructures into thematerialIn mask marking (fig 1.a), a stencil of thedesired mark is p<strong>ro</strong>jected onto the workpiece.The picture of the mask on the object is madeusing a lens. Employed in the mask markingare often the pulsed lasers [1], [2], [3].In the beam deflected method (fig. 1.b), thelaser is directed via two galvanometer mir<strong>ro</strong>rsand a lens system to the object to be marked.Using special software, a computer cont<strong>ro</strong>lsthe galvanometer mir<strong>ro</strong>rs. The marking ismade by directing the beam in directions xand y. The beam deflection method is veryflexible and can transmit a high density ofinformation. The lasers used in this methodare often continuous wave lasers.Comparing the two marking methods, it isconcluded that• marking speed: mask marking has highermarking speed up to a few tens piecesper second. Because the laser pulseduration is in the range of mic<strong>ro</strong>-second tonanosecond, the workpiece to be markeddoes not need to stop.• marking area: beam deflected markinghas a bigger marking area. The markingarea by mask marking is very smallbecause of limited beam spot size andenergy per pulse.• flexibility: in mask making, the patternsrequired are p<strong>ro</strong>duced by masks. Top<strong>ro</strong>duce a mask is time-consuming.Therefore, mask marking is more suitablefor high-volume p<strong>ro</strong>duction without anychange on the patterns. In beam deflectedmarking, the patterns are p<strong>ro</strong>duced bysoftware. Thus, it is highly flexible tochange patterns.• cost of investment: in general, the cost ofbeam deflected marking is higherbecause the scanning system is moreexpensive.18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!