10.07.2015 Views

The Precession of Simulacra.pdf - kareneliot.de

The Precession of Simulacra.pdf - kareneliot.de

The Precession of Simulacra.pdf - kareneliot.de

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jean Baudrillard - Simulations (English Translation)16.08.11 20:28guarantee an eternity <strong>of</strong> power. Is it not man's miracle to have invented, with plastic, a non-<strong>de</strong>gradablematerial, interrupting thus the cycle which, by corruption and <strong>de</strong>ath, turns all the earth's substancesceaselessly one into another? A substance out-<strong>of</strong>-the-cycle; even fire leaves an in<strong>de</strong>structible residue.<strong>The</strong>re is something incredible about it, this simulacrum where you can see in a con<strong>de</strong>nsed form theambition <strong>of</strong> a universal semiotic. This has nothing to do with the "progress" <strong>of</strong> technology or with arational goal for science. It is a project <strong>of</strong> political and cultural hegemony, the fantasy <strong>of</strong> a closed mentalsubstance - like those angels <strong>of</strong> baroque stucco whose extremities meet in a curved mirror.<strong>The</strong> Automation <strong>of</strong> the RobotA whole world separates these two artificial beings. One is a theatrical counterfeit, a mechanical andclock-like man; technique submits entirely to analogy and to the effect <strong>of</strong> semblance. <strong>The</strong> other isdominated by the technical principle; the machine overri<strong>de</strong>s all, and with the machine equivalence comestoo. <strong>The</strong> automaton plays the part <strong>of</strong> courtier and good company; it participates in the pre-RevolutionaryFrench theatrical and social games. <strong>The</strong> robot, on the other hand, as his name indicates, is a worker: thetheatre is over and done with, the reign <strong>of</strong> mechanical man commences. <strong>The</strong> automaton is the analogy <strong>of</strong>man and remains his interlocutor (they play chess together!). <strong>The</strong> machine is man's equivalent andannexes him to itself in the unity <strong>of</strong> its operational process. This is the difference between a simulacrum<strong>of</strong> the first or<strong>de</strong>r and one <strong>of</strong> the second.We shouldn't make any mistakes on this matter for reasons <strong>of</strong> "figurative" resemblance between robotand automaton. <strong>The</strong> latter is an interrogation upon nature, the mystery <strong>of</strong> the existence or non-existence<strong>of</strong> the soul, the dilemma <strong>of</strong> appearance and being. It is like God: what's un<strong>de</strong>rneath it all, what's insi<strong>de</strong>,what's in the back <strong>of</strong> it? Only the counterfeit men allow these problems to be posed. <strong>The</strong> entiremetaphysics <strong>of</strong> man as protagonist <strong>of</strong> the natural theatre <strong>of</strong> the creation is incarnated in the automaton,before disappearing with the Revolution. And the automaton has no other <strong>de</strong>stiny than to be ceaselesslycompared to living man - so as to be more natural than him, <strong>of</strong> which he is the i<strong>de</strong>al figure. A perfectdouble for man, right up to the suppleness <strong>of</strong> his movements, the functioning <strong>of</strong> his organs andintelligence - right up to touching upon the anguish there would be in becoming aware that there is nodifference, that the soul is over with and now it is an i<strong>de</strong>ally naturalized body which absorbs its energy.Sacrilege. This difference is then always maintained, as in the case <strong>of</strong> that perfect automaton that theimpersonator's jerky movements on stage imitate; so that at least, even if the roles were reversed, noconfusion would be possible. In this way the interrogation <strong>of</strong> the automaton remains an open one, whichmakes it out to be a kind <strong>of</strong> mechanical optimist, even if the counterfeit always connotes somethingdiabolical. 1No such thing with the robot. <strong>The</strong> robot no longer interrogates appearance; its only truth is in itsmechanical efficacy. It is no longer turned towards a resemblance with man, to whom furthermore it nolonger bears comparison. That infinitesimal metaphysical difference, which ma<strong>de</strong> all the charm andmystery <strong>of</strong> the automaton, no longer exists; the robot has absorbed it for its own benefit. Being andappearance are melted into a common substance <strong>of</strong> production and work. <strong>The</strong> first-or<strong>de</strong>r simulacrumnever abolished difference. It supposes an always <strong>de</strong>tectable alteration between semblance and reality (aparticularly subtle game with trompe-l'oeil painting, but art lives entirely <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> this gap). <strong>The</strong> secondor<strong>de</strong>rsimulacrum simplifies the problem by the absorption <strong>of</strong> the appearances, or by the liquidation <strong>of</strong>the real, whichever. It establishes in any case a reality, image, echo, appearance; such is certainly work,the machine, the system <strong>of</strong> industrial production in its entirety, in that it is radically opposed to theprinciple <strong>of</strong> theatrical illusion. No more resemblance or lack <strong>of</strong> resemblance, <strong>of</strong> God, or human being,but an imminent logic <strong>of</strong> the operational principle.http://www.ee.sun.ac.za/~hgibson/docs/html/<strong>Simulacra</strong>-and-Simulation.html#c2Seite 27 von 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!