10.07.2015 Views

An Archaeological Evaluation at The Six Bells public house, St ...

An Archaeological Evaluation at The Six Bells public house, St ...

An Archaeological Evaluation at The Six Bells public house, St ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Archaeology South-EastASE<strong>An</strong> <strong>Archaeological</strong> <strong>Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>,<strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> Albans, HertfordshireNGR: TL 13677 07398NGR: 513677 207398Project No: 5024Site Code: SXB 11ASE Report No: 2011190Dylan Hopkinson MAWith contributions by Gemma Ayton, Paul Blinkhorn, Trista Clifford,<strong>An</strong>na Doherty, Karine Le Hégar<strong>at</strong>, Sarah Porteus and Elke RaemenAugust 2011


<strong>An</strong> <strong>Archaeological</strong> <strong>Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>,<strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> Albans, HertfordshireNGR: TL 13677 07398NGR: 513677 207398Project No: 5024Site Code: SXB 11ASE Report No: 2011190Dylan Hopkinson MAWith contributions by Gemma Ayton, Paul Blinkhorn, Trista Clifford,<strong>An</strong>na Doherty, Karine Le Hégar<strong>at</strong>, Sarah Porteus and Elke RaemenAugust 2011Archaeology South-EastUnits 1 & 22 Chapel PlacePortsladeEast SussexBN41 1DRTel: 01273 426830Fax: 01273 420866Email: fau@ucl.ac.uk


AbstractArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190<strong>An</strong> archaeological evalu<strong>at</strong>ion was conducted in the car-park of <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong><strong>house</strong>, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> Albans, Hertfordshire, AL3 4SH (NGR 513677 207398).Archaeology South-East, a division of the Centre for Applied Archaeology, UCL, wascommissioned to carry out the work by Oxford Scientific Films. <strong>The</strong> work was carriedout between 11 th July and 15 th July 2011 and formed part of a pilot programme to betelevised by the History Channel and Channel 5.<strong>The</strong> site lies within the walls of Roman Verulamium and Roman structures interpretedas a b<strong>at</strong>h-<strong>house</strong> had been previously identified on the site during the extension of thepub buildings in 1974-5. Two trenches were excav<strong>at</strong>ed by Archaeology South-East inorder to further assess the extent of these structures, and to demonstr<strong>at</strong>earchaeological procedures and local history to the wider <strong>public</strong>.In Trench 2, two abutting Roman walls were recorded, one of which shared the samealignment as the NW-SE wall of the earlier excav<strong>at</strong>ions under the <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>.Roman floor surfaces were also identified associ<strong>at</strong>ed with these walls. A deposit ofpainted plaster was identified face down as it had fallen from a wall or ceiling. <strong>The</strong>seRoman levels had been sealed by a post medieval deposit th<strong>at</strong> was cut by a numberof refuse pits and postholes and the trench was sealed by a deep deposit of Victoriangarden soil and the car-park surface.Trench 1 identified a large circular cut fe<strong>at</strong>ure with fire scorched edges and a decayedchalk deposit <strong>at</strong> the base; this was interpreted as a post-medieval lime kiln thought tohave gone out of use during the 18 th to 19 th centuries.i© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190CONTENTS1.0 Introduction2.0 <strong>Archaeological</strong> Background3.0 <strong>Archaeological</strong> Methodology4.0 Results5.0 Finds6.0 Environmental Samples7.0 DiscussionBibliographyAcknowledgementsAppendix A: Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of findsAppendix B: Residue quantific<strong>at</strong>ionAppendix C: Flot quantific<strong>at</strong>ionAppendix D: Coin c<strong>at</strong>alogueFIGURESFigure 1: Site loc<strong>at</strong>ionFigure 2: Trench loc<strong>at</strong>ionFigure 3: Trench 1 plan, sections and photosFigure 4: Trench 2 plan, sections and photosFigure 5: Painted wall plaster from contexts [010] and [012]Figure 6: Painted wall plaster from context [005]Figure 7: Selected potteryFigure 8: Site plan showing loc<strong>at</strong>ion of fe<strong>at</strong>ures identified in 1970’s excav<strong>at</strong>ionsTABLESTable 1: Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of site archiveTable 2: List of contexts in Trench 1Table 3: List of contexts in Trench 2Table 4: Post-Roman pottery: occurrence by number and weight (in g) of sherds percontext by fabric typeTable 5: Summary of building m<strong>at</strong>erial recovered by periodTable 6: Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of Roman building m<strong>at</strong>erial formsTable 7: <strong>The</strong> Registered FindsTable 8: Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of the flintworkTable 9: <strong>An</strong>imal bone: NISP countsii© Archaeology South-East


1.0 INTRODUCTIONArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111901.1 Site Background1.1.1 Archaeology South-East (ASE) (a division of <strong>The</strong> Centre for Applied Archaeology <strong>at</strong> theInstitute of Archaeology, University College London) was commissioned by OxfordScientific Films (hereafter referred to as OSF) to undertake an archaeological evalu<strong>at</strong>ionin the grounds of <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> Albans,Hertfordshire, AL3 4SH (NGR 513677 207398, Fig. 1) as the archaeological element ofa pilot television programme exploring the history of the pub, Verulamium and <strong>St</strong> Albans.1.2 Geology and Topography1.2.1 According to the British Geological Survey (BGS 2011), the superficial geology of thesite consists of undifferenti<strong>at</strong>ed River Terrace deposits of sand and gravel which rise tothe south west from the current alluvial flood plain of the River Ver. <strong>The</strong> underlyingbedrock geology comprises undifferenti<strong>at</strong>ed Lewes Nodular and Seaford Chalkform<strong>at</strong>ions.1.2.2 <strong>The</strong> site is situ<strong>at</strong>ed towards the eastern limit of the modern town of <strong>St</strong> Albans and withinthe extent of the previous Iron Age territorial oppidum and subsequent Roman town ofVerulamium; however it lies just outside the Scheduled Areas associ<strong>at</strong>ed withVerulamium.1.2.3 <strong>The</strong> site covers an area of 590 m 2, representing the rear car park of the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong><strong>house</strong>. This is bounded to the south by <strong>St</strong> Michael's <strong>St</strong>reet, to the east by a flint wall andresidential property, to the north by a flint wall with a car park and grassland beyond, andto the west by a residential property.1.3 Aims and Objectives1.3.1 A Written Scheme of Investig<strong>at</strong>ion was prepared in advance of the evalu<strong>at</strong>ion, andapproved by Simon West, the <strong>St</strong> Albans District Archaeologist (ASE 2011). <strong>The</strong>document set out the following aims and objectives:1.3.2 General To excav<strong>at</strong>e and record all archaeological remains and deposits exposed in theexcav<strong>at</strong>ion with a view to understanding their character, extent, preserv<strong>at</strong>ion,significance and d<strong>at</strong>e.To provide m<strong>at</strong>erial and setting for OSF filming.To assess, analyse and publish any findings.1.3.3 SpecificTo determine whether there is further evidence of L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age activity on the site inassoci<strong>at</strong>ion with the previously discovered coin moulds, L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age / early Romanclay wall or inception of the B<strong>at</strong>h House?To determine whether there are further remains associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the early Roman b<strong>at</strong>h<strong>house</strong> and the pre Boudican development of the site?1© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190To determine whether there is evidence rel<strong>at</strong>ing to the l<strong>at</strong>er Roman occup<strong>at</strong>ion of thesite?To determine whether there is evidence rel<strong>at</strong>ing to the post-Roman occup<strong>at</strong>ion of thesite? To investig<strong>at</strong>e how the site developed during the medieval and early post-medievalperiod in associ<strong>at</strong>ion with the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong> and determine whether there isevidence of a precursor to this structure?1.4 Scope of the Report1.4.1 This report provides an account of the archaeological evalu<strong>at</strong>ion and places it within thecontext of earlier work in the vicinity, namely the excav<strong>at</strong>ions of the extension to the pubin 1974 and 1975. <strong>The</strong> fieldwork was undertaken between the 11 th July and the 15 th July2011 by Dylan Hopkinson and Nick Garland (Archaeologists); finds were processed onsite by <strong>An</strong>na Doherty (Senior Archaeologist).1.4.2 <strong>The</strong> project was managed by Jon Sygrave (fieldwork) and Jim <strong>St</strong>evenson (postexcav<strong>at</strong>ionanalysis).2© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111902.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND2.1 Introduction2.1.1 <strong>An</strong> HER search and a review of published m<strong>at</strong>erial was requested and the HertfordshireCounty Council HER Officer Dr Isobel Thompson helped define an appropri<strong>at</strong>e search areaof 100 metre radius around the site and provided a summary of the site's l<strong>at</strong>er Iron Age andRoman background. <strong>The</strong> site is situ<strong>at</strong>ed within the confines of the L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age oppidumand in a significant part of the Roman town of Verulamium, within Insula XIX. It isapproxim<strong>at</strong>ely 13 metres from the street th<strong>at</strong> divided Insula XIX from Insula XVIII and whichleads from the north-east g<strong>at</strong>e of the town towards the Basilica. <strong>The</strong> site therefore has a highpotential for remains from the l<strong>at</strong>er Iron Age to Roman transition (SADC 2005, 13).2.2 Prehistoric2.2.1 Evidence for human activities in the Ver valley prior to the l<strong>at</strong>er Iron Age is scarce althoughfour monuments have been identified in the wider landscape. A small number of find-spotsof L<strong>at</strong>e Bronze Age and Early Iron Age pottery are loc<strong>at</strong>ed on the southern side of the valley,whilst. L<strong>at</strong>e Bronze Age flint debitage has also been identified in pits on the northern flank ofthe valley.2.3 L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age2.3.1 It is thought th<strong>at</strong> the L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age settlement developed on the higher ground on both sidesof the Ver valley; and was defined behind long boundary ditches th<strong>at</strong> demarc<strong>at</strong>ed domesticareas from the valley itself. This site was known as Verlamion, or Verlamio, and was thetribal capital of the C<strong>at</strong>uvellauni tribe in Iron Age Britain.2.4 Roman2.4.1 <strong>The</strong> transition from the L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age to Roman periods is not thought to have been typifiedby sudden change as a result of Roman conquest, but r<strong>at</strong>her by a longer period oftransform<strong>at</strong>ion of the previous L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age oppidum. <strong>The</strong> L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age Chieftain survivedthe beginning of the Roman occup<strong>at</strong>ion as a Client King, dying after c. AD50, when he wasinterred with grave goods, including a suit of chain mail armour, in a burial above and to thenorth of the oppidum.2.4.2 At this time, the early Roman settlement gained the st<strong>at</strong>us of municipium and was namedVerulamium, allowing its leading magistr<strong>at</strong>es to become Roman citizens. <strong>The</strong> first street gridsystem was laid out between c. AD50-60, following the Client King's de<strong>at</strong>h and prior to theBoudican revolt. This formalised layout is thought to follow roughly the L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age roadalignment.2.4.3 <strong>The</strong> town was destroyed in the Boudican rebellion of AD60/1, and although this appears tohave had a severe impact for a number of years, the settlement developed into a fullyfunctioning Roman town during the Flavian period, with a forum and basilica completed inAD79-81.2.5 Saxon and Medieval3© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111902.5.1 <strong>The</strong> early post-Roman (5 th -8 th centuries) occup<strong>at</strong>ion of the town was centred on <strong>St</strong> Michael'svillage. <strong>St</strong> Michael's Church, which lies to the south-west of the site, was thought to havebeen constructed in the 10 th century and was one of the three churches on the main roadsentering <strong>St</strong> Albans which helped prepare pilgrims for their visit to <strong>St</strong> Alban's shrine in theAbbey. <strong>The</strong> church’s graveyard is thought to have extended beyond its present bounds towithin c. 50m of the present site.2.6 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong>2.6.1 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong> is thought to d<strong>at</strong>e back to the 15 th century and, with its position onone of the main roads into <strong>St</strong> Albans, may have offered accommod<strong>at</strong>ion to pilgrims and their<strong>at</strong>tendants and horses in buildings or yards, within the plot now covered by the car park.This area may also have <strong>house</strong>d other outbuildings associ<strong>at</strong>ed with brewing or maltingsimilar to the one recorded to the north-east of the site (MHT7073). L<strong>at</strong>er cess pits andrubbish pits may also have been associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the l<strong>at</strong>er post-medieval pub.2.7 Previous Excav<strong>at</strong>ions (Fig 8)2.7.1 Excav<strong>at</strong>ions were carried out during the construction of the extension of the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> pub in1974/5. Although the results were not fully published, a short summary appeared in Britannia(Wilson et al 1975, 258) and the excav<strong>at</strong>ions were reported on in a grey liter<strong>at</strong>ure document(Saunders unpublished).2.7.2 <strong>The</strong> earliest m<strong>at</strong>erial uncovered during the 1974/5 excav<strong>at</strong>ions was a sc<strong>at</strong>ter of nondiagnosticflint implements, probably of Mesolithic d<strong>at</strong>e, identified within a buried soiloverlying the n<strong>at</strong>ural geology; however this soil contained m<strong>at</strong>erial of various d<strong>at</strong>es and theflints were considered to be residual.2.7.3 Evidence of pre-conquest activity was uncovered on the site, the most significant elementbeing 38 fragments of Iron Age coin moulds and grog tempered ‘Belgic’ type pottery within adeposit sealed by early Roman contexts.2.7.4 One wall of a timber framed building with clay walls was identified during the excav<strong>at</strong>ions.This had been destroyed by fire, presumably during the Boudican revolt. This wall seems tohave been strengthened with amphora sherds and rendered with a blue painted plaster.Although little of the wall plan was identified, it did seem to share the same alignment as asecond masonry building immedi<strong>at</strong>ely to the north-east.2.7.5 This building was represented by three masonry walls. On the south-western side of thebuilding, an exterior wall was identified with dressed faces and chalk found<strong>at</strong>ions; its innerface exhibited a series of short buttresses or pilasters. From this face, an interior floorsurface survived with a dado moulding <strong>at</strong> the junction of the wall and the floor. <strong>The</strong> tworemaining walls formed an ‘L’ junction some three metres to the east, extending furthereastwards and northwards. This configur<strong>at</strong>ion formed an ‘ambul<strong>at</strong>ory’ where the floorsurface was identified and the internal part of the ‘L’ enclosed a sunken floor some 1.10mbelow the primary floor of the ambul<strong>at</strong>ory. <strong>The</strong> building was interpreted as a b<strong>at</strong>h-<strong>house</strong>although it may have been connected to other buildings and there were suggestions th<strong>at</strong> itmay have been preceded by an earlier structure.2.7.6 This building had also been fire damaged, and again it is thought th<strong>at</strong> this happened duringthe Boudican revolt. This suggests th<strong>at</strong> the ‘b<strong>at</strong>h <strong>house</strong>’ may have been one of the earliestRoman additions to the L<strong>at</strong>e Iron Age oppidum.4© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111902.7.7. Although damaged, the building was re-used in some form after a new mortar floor was laidand timber lined drains were replaced. However, between c. AD 70-80, the b<strong>at</strong>h buildingfurther decayed and there is evidence th<strong>at</strong> it was eventually deliber<strong>at</strong>ely dismantled, and thearea used for rubbish disposal during the l<strong>at</strong>e 1 st and early 2 nd century.2.7.8 <strong>The</strong> earliest post-Roman activity on the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> extension site was the digging of a pitth<strong>at</strong> contained 13th-14th century pottery; however, there was no good evidence foractivities in this area until the post-medieval period when a 17th-18th century timberbuilding occupied the street frontage.5© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111903.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY3.1 Excav<strong>at</strong>ion Methodology3.1.1 <strong>The</strong> work was carried out in accordance with the Written Scheme of Investig<strong>at</strong>ionprepared prior to the commencement of the evalu<strong>at</strong>ion (ASE 2011), and followedrelevant professional guidelines (IfA 2008).3.1.2 <strong>The</strong> <strong>St</strong> Albans District Archaeologist (Simon West) and the archaeological represent<strong>at</strong>iveof OSF (Paul Blinkhorn) were present on site during the excav<strong>at</strong>ion; they were informedof progress and were available to meet on site regularly to review progress.3.1.3 <strong>The</strong> original methodology set out in the WSI comprised the excav<strong>at</strong>ion of two trencheswithin the rear car park of <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong>. Trench 1, <strong>at</strong> the entrance to the car-park, was tomeasure 3m by 2m and Trench 2 was to measure 3m by 6m. This excav<strong>at</strong>ion str<strong>at</strong>egywas initially followed but, after the machine excav<strong>at</strong>ion of Trench 1, a single cut fe<strong>at</strong>urewas identified lying just within the northern extent of the trench. Following discussionswith the District Archaeologist and the archaeological represent<strong>at</strong>ive of OSF, a decisionwas made to extend Trench 1 by around a metre to the north-west (Fig. 2).3.1.4 <strong>The</strong> trenches were stripped using a c. 3 ton 360º tracked machine. <strong>The</strong> machine wasused to remove undifferenti<strong>at</strong>ed topsoil or made ground in spits of no more than 100mmuntil archaeological deposits were encountered or the top of the underlying n<strong>at</strong>uralsediments was reached. <strong>The</strong> mechanical excav<strong>at</strong>or was fitted with a smooth gradingbucket and care was taken not to damage archaeological deposits by over machining.3.1.5 After the stripping and planning of the excav<strong>at</strong>ion areas was completed, an excav<strong>at</strong>ionstr<strong>at</strong>egy was agreed with the <strong>St</strong> Albans District Archaeologist in associ<strong>at</strong>ion with OSF.Given the limited time available, excav<strong>at</strong>ion focused on post-Roman fe<strong>at</strong>ures and layers.As well as aiding understanding of l<strong>at</strong>er development on the site, the excav<strong>at</strong>ion of postmedievalcut fe<strong>at</strong>ures allowed Roman str<strong>at</strong>igraphy to be exposed and recorded withoutbeing impacted upon.3.1.6 <strong>The</strong> excav<strong>at</strong>ion was carried out using the single context method, as described in theMoLAS (1994) site manual. All excav<strong>at</strong>ed spoil was scanned with a metal detector.3.1.7 <strong>The</strong> sampling str<strong>at</strong>egy for palaeoenvironmental remains involved bulk samples ofbetween 40 and 60 litres, collected for the recovery of carbonised remains, animalbones, molluscs and small artefacts.3.1.8 When excav<strong>at</strong>ion and recording was complete, the exposed archaeological surfaceswere protected using Terram geotextile. <strong>The</strong> trenches were backfilled and reinst<strong>at</strong>ed byASE's ground works contractor, using 0.20m of soft fine sand and were topped up withtype one aggreg<strong>at</strong>e.3.2 Public Engagement3.2.1 During the fieldwork, ASE had access to volunteers recommended by the DistrictArchaeologist, who were involved in metal detecting spoil from the excav<strong>at</strong>ions and ininitial on site identific<strong>at</strong>ion of artefacts.3.2.2 As the excav<strong>at</strong>ion took place in an area frequented by members of the <strong>public</strong> thetrenches were suitably fenced off, and ASE staff were on hand to explain the progress ofthe excav<strong>at</strong>ion.6© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111903.3 Recording Methodology3.3.1 A temporary benchmark was transferred into the site from the street outside the pub andthe trench loc<strong>at</strong>ions planned onto the Ordnance Survey N<strong>at</strong>ional Grid by triangul<strong>at</strong>ingfrom known points on surveyed buildings. All remains were levelled with respect toOrdnance Survey d<strong>at</strong>um.3.3.2 All archaeological fe<strong>at</strong>ures were recorded according to standard ASE practice, followingthe MoLAS (1994) site manual. <strong>The</strong> site was planned on plastic drafting film, using thesingle context method <strong>at</strong> a scale of 1:20 on 5m by 5m grids; sections were drawn <strong>at</strong>1:10. Fe<strong>at</strong>ures and deposits were described on standard pro-forma recording sheetsused by ASE. A photographic record of all fe<strong>at</strong>ures was made in digital form<strong>at</strong> and withblack and white and colour slide film.3.4 Site Archive3.4.1 <strong>The</strong> site archive is currently held <strong>at</strong> the offices of ASE and has been offered to the <strong>St</strong>Albans Museum for cur<strong>at</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong> contents of the archive are tabul<strong>at</strong>ed below (Table 1).Trench Record Sheets 2Number of Context Register Sheets 2Number of Context Sheets 47Photographic Record Sheets 6Photographs 114Drawing List Sheets 2Drawing Sheets 32Levels Record Sheets 3Bulk Sample Register Sheets 2Bulk Sample Record Sheets 5No. of files/paper record 1Table 1: Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of site archive7© Archaeology South-East


4.0 RESULTSArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111904.1 Trench 1 (Fig. 3; Table 2)4.1.1 N<strong>at</strong>ural geologyIn Trench 1, a n<strong>at</strong>ural deposit, [041], comprising a firm orangeish-brown clay withoccasional gravels, was identified <strong>at</strong> a height of 82.07m AOD.4.1.2 Layers directly overlying n<strong>at</strong>ural geology<strong>The</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ural geology was overlain by a deposit, [040], of firm orangeish-brown clay,containing common pieces of burnt clay or daub up to 5mm in diameter and occasionalcharcoal flecks. This deposit was 1.02m wide, and its length was gre<strong>at</strong>er than the widthof the trench; it was not excav<strong>at</strong>ed but its surface was observed <strong>at</strong> around 0.13m abovethe level of n<strong>at</strong>ural geology (Fig 3, section 3). This was interpreted as re-depositedn<strong>at</strong>ural clay and it is possible th<strong>at</strong> it is a remnant of the overlying clay layer, [043], th<strong>at</strong>was removed by machine excav<strong>at</strong>ion of the trench (4.4.3).Deposit [043] was firm orangeish brown clay with common gravel inclusions andfrequent charcoal flecks; this was observed in the southern half of the trench over adistance of 2.80m; it was 0.30m thick. It is likely to be re-deposited n<strong>at</strong>ural clay, similarto layer [040] but without any observed burnt clay / daub inclusions.4.1.3 Possible lime kilnThis clay layer was cut by a large circular fe<strong>at</strong>ure, [006], of 2.60m in diameter andaround 2.00m in depth. <strong>The</strong> fe<strong>at</strong>ure was initially only partially exposed and the trenchwas lengthened so th<strong>at</strong> its extent could be determined. Its upper fill was hand excav<strong>at</strong>edto a depth of around 0.55m and, given the time available, an auger sounding was carriedout to determine its depth. <strong>The</strong> exposed sides of the fe<strong>at</strong>ure were vertical and showedclear signs of he<strong>at</strong> scorching of the surrounding deposits through which it was cut(shown on Figure 1 as [031]). <strong>The</strong> he<strong>at</strong> scorching was initially restricted to a zone of highdiscolour<strong>at</strong>ion up to 0.26m wide around the cut; in the eastern side of the cut, this zoneof orange scorching was thinner - around 0.12m wide - and the zone behind it was he<strong>at</strong>scorched to a blackish brown colour. <strong>The</strong>re were also indic<strong>at</strong>ions of he<strong>at</strong> transform<strong>at</strong>ionof the re-deposited clay, [043], up to 1.00m from the cut edge.<strong>The</strong> earliest deposit brought up by the auger was a reddish-orange gritty clay, [038],similar in appearance to the zone of he<strong>at</strong> scorching observed in the sides of cut [006].This was observed to be <strong>at</strong> least 0.24m thick and interpreted as he<strong>at</strong> modified n<strong>at</strong>uralclay: the top of this context therefore being the base of cut [006]. Fragments of thism<strong>at</strong>erial recovered from an environmental sample displayed numerous thin grey bands,perhaps suggesting repe<strong>at</strong>ed firing to a high temper<strong>at</strong>ure.<strong>The</strong> probable primary fill of fe<strong>at</strong>ure [006] was [039], a 0.35m thick layer of soft and friablepale grey gravely silt, containing common charcoal flecks and chalk pieces of up to40mm in diameter, which was also only tested by auger. This deposit was thought to bederived from the burning of chalk within a kiln to cre<strong>at</strong>e lime.<strong>The</strong> upper fill of fe<strong>at</strong>ure [006], [005] was a pale orangeish-brown sandy silt with frequentflint nodules of less than 0.20m in diameter and common chalk pieces of less than0.10m in diameter, as well as common charcoal flecks and occasional large voids This8© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190deposit was excav<strong>at</strong>ed by hand and by auger to a total depth of 0.95m.Fill [005] had a rubbly appearance, possibly suggesting th<strong>at</strong> it represents deliber<strong>at</strong>ebackfilling when the possible kiln went out of use. <strong>The</strong> animal bone assemblage fromthis context showed evidence of butchery; however, the bone was evenly distributedthrough the deposit and may have been incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed in backfill m<strong>at</strong>erial r<strong>at</strong>her thanrepresenting a primary dump of butchery waste. In any event it appears th<strong>at</strong> part of thehe<strong>at</strong> scorched edge of the kiln or pit had collapsed by this time, or was displaced duringthe infilling of the fe<strong>at</strong>ure, as a small area of he<strong>at</strong> scorched clay was observed lyinghorizontally and was sealed by [005].This deposit has been d<strong>at</strong>ed to the post-medieval period by a piece of clay tobacco pipe,d<strong>at</strong>ed to 1720-1800, and a post-Roman d<strong>at</strong>e is supported by small pieces of limestoneidentified as ‘clunch’, a building stone quarried from the upper chalk <strong>at</strong> Totternhoe andused in <strong>St</strong> Albans and elsewhere from the 13 th century onwards. However, this depositalso contained a quantity of redeposited Roman m<strong>at</strong>erial including pottery which wasexclusively of 1 st century d<strong>at</strong>e, painted wall plaster and a fragment of Roman flue tilesimilar to those identified within early Roman he<strong>at</strong>ed structures such as b<strong>at</strong>h complexes.Seven fragments of burnt daub were also recorded, which may also suggest th<strong>at</strong> anearly Roman structure was loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the vicinity.4.1.4 Layers and fe<strong>at</strong>ures post-d<strong>at</strong>ing the possible lime kiln<strong>The</strong> rubble fill was finally sealed by, [004], a levelling layer of dark brown sandy silt withcommon chalk flecks and frequent gravels. This layer of made ground was 0.30m thick,and contained a sherd of probable 17 th century Red Earthenware, as well as Roman,medieval and post-medieval CBM.Layer [004] was cut by a number of l<strong>at</strong>er post-medieval fe<strong>at</strong>ures. Firstly, a linear cut,[003], with a sloping base, measuring 1.20m wide and 0.45m deep was recorded in thenorth-east facing section. <strong>The</strong> cut had steep fl<strong>at</strong> sides and a fl<strong>at</strong> base in profile and wasfilled with a dark blackish-brown sandy silt [002].Secondly, a sub circular pit, [034], measuring 0.77m in diameter and 0.78m in depth wasobserved in the north of the trench, also cutting layer [004]; this was filled with ablackish-brown sandy silt, [033].Thirdly, a drainage soakaway cut [045] was loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the south-east of the trench. Thisextended into the trench by 0.14m and was filled with brick rubble [044]. This fe<strong>at</strong>urewas not excav<strong>at</strong>ed.<strong>The</strong> last of the fe<strong>at</strong>ures cutting layer [004] was the squared end of a pit, [047]. Itmeasured 1.00m wide and 0.61m deep and was observed extending into the trench by0.18m in the middle of the southwest facing trench section. This was filled with, [046], ablackish brown sandy silt. <strong>The</strong> fe<strong>at</strong>ure was exposed during the machine excav<strong>at</strong>ion ofthe trench and was not excav<strong>at</strong>ed.<strong>The</strong> fe<strong>at</strong>ures and deposits in Trench 1 were sealed by [001], the tarmac of the car park.9© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190ContextNumberTypeDescriptionMax. DepositThickness (m)D<strong>at</strong>um m AOD001 Deposit Tarmac 0.10m 82.86002 Deposit Fill of cut [003] 0.45m 82.63003 Cut Linear cut 0.45m 82.63004 Deposit Made Ground 0.30m 82.86005 Deposit Sealing fill of kiln cut [006] 0.95m 82.51006 Cut Kiln cut 2.00m 82.51031 Deposit He<strong>at</strong> scorched n<strong>at</strong>ural - 82.37033 Deposit Fill of sub circular pit cut 0.78m 82.58034 Cut Sub circular pit cut 0.78m 82.58038 Deposit He<strong>at</strong> scorched n<strong>at</strong>ural in base of 0.40m 80.87[006]039 Deposit Chalky basal fill of [006] 0.35m 81.18040 Deposit Re-deposited n<strong>at</strong>ural - 82.51041 Deposit N<strong>at</strong>ural clay - 82.07042 Deposit Collapsed side of kiln cut 0.24m 82.51043 Deposit Re-deposited n<strong>at</strong>ural 0.30m 82.51044 Deposit Brick rubble soakaway fill 0.48m + 82.38045 Cut Soakaway cut 0.48m + 82.38046 Deposit Squared pit fill 0.61m 82.47047 Cut Squared pit cut 0.61m 82.47Table 2: List of contexts in Trench 14.2 Trench 2 (Fig. 4, Table 3)4.2.1 IntroductionExcav<strong>at</strong>ion within Trench 2 did not extend to the n<strong>at</strong>ural geology but stopped <strong>at</strong> thesurface of the Roman archaeology.4.2.2 Roman walls<strong>St</strong>r<strong>at</strong>igraphically the earliest fe<strong>at</strong>ure identified was a north-west – south-east orient<strong>at</strong>edwall, [018]. This was constructed of 40mm thick Roman bricks ranging in size from0.16m by 0.13m to 0.20m by 0.14m. <strong>The</strong> wall was only seen in plan and no brick samplewas extracted for analysis. <strong>The</strong> wall was 0.50m wide and was observed running acrossthe trench over a distance of 2.95m.Butting against the south-western face of this wall was a second perpendicular wall,[037], which was of similar construction and measured 0.50m in width; it extended to thesouthwest for a distance of 2.97m and continued beyond the limit of excav<strong>at</strong>ion. In onearea, where this wall had been partially cut by a l<strong>at</strong>er fe<strong>at</strong>ure, a possible course of flintnodules was just visible.4.2.3 Roman layersOn either side of wall [037], were deposits of dark orangeish brown sandy clay withcharcoal flecks, plaster inclusions and moder<strong>at</strong>e gravels; to the northwest these wereassigned the number [035] and to the southeast, [036]. <strong>The</strong>se deposits were not© Archaeology South-East10


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190excav<strong>at</strong>ed and could be interpreted either as floor surfaces or accumul<strong>at</strong>ions ofdemolition m<strong>at</strong>erial within the rooms defined by the walls.A similar deposit of orangeish brown gravely clay with charcoal and plaster inclusions,[048], was observed in the north-eastern end of the trench, to the north of wall [018].This deposit was not fully visible in plan and was only observed where l<strong>at</strong>er fe<strong>at</strong>ures[013]; [015] and [017] had cut through overlying layer [010]; it was seen to be <strong>at</strong> least0.38m deep.<strong>An</strong>other area of mortar floor surface, [049], was similarly only partially exposed in plan,in the southern corner of the trench, where l<strong>at</strong>er fe<strong>at</strong>ures [026] and [028] cut throughoverlying layer, [011]. Because the floor was only partially exposed and was notexcav<strong>at</strong>ed, no physical rel<strong>at</strong>ionship with the floor/demolition deposit, [036], was proven;however, the surface of the floor was <strong>at</strong> a higher level than [036] and therefore probablyoverlay it.In the northern half of the trench, a layer of painted plaster, [010], was observed, with thepainted surface facing down as though it had fallen from a wall or ceiling in a singleevent; the plaster itself was considered more likely to derive from wall (see below). Asmall amount of this plaster was lifted to confirm th<strong>at</strong> it had a painted surface, and wasshown to have stripes and borders in yellow, red, green, white and pink; however it wasnot possible to identify the motif from the fragments lifted. This layer was seen to sealthe orangeish brown gravely clay [048], although no rel<strong>at</strong>ionship was observed with wall[037], or with [035] and [036], the potential floor/demolition deposits either side of it.4.2.4 Post-medieval layers and fe<strong>at</strong>ures<strong>The</strong> plaster layer was in turn sealed by, [011], a deposit of orangeish brown sandy claywith frequent gravel inclusions and small mortar fragments. This deposit survived as alayer th<strong>at</strong> covered the entire southern half of the trench and, in isol<strong>at</strong>ed p<strong>at</strong>ches over theplaster, in the northern half of the trench. <strong>An</strong> area of this was excav<strong>at</strong>ed along thenorthern side and the western corner of the trench; here the deposit was seen to be0.14m thick. Roman pottery, CBM and tesserae were recovered from wh<strong>at</strong> was thoughton site to have been a demolition layer associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the abandonment of the Romanbuildings; however, post-medieval CBM was also recovered with a d<strong>at</strong>e range from 16 thto 19 th centuries.A number of fe<strong>at</strong>ures cut through layer [011], including three postholes, all of whichwhich were square in plan with slightly rounded corners, sharing similar dimensions ofaround 0.20-0.30m in length and width and 0.20m in depth, suggesting th<strong>at</strong> they formedpart of a structure. Posthole cut [017] extended slightly beyond the north-western trenchsection, it was filled by [016], a dark brown silty clay. Around 1.60m to the south-east, laypost-hole [020], which was filled by, [019], a light orangeish brown silty clay. <strong>The</strong> finalposthole, [022], lay <strong>at</strong> 90 0 to the first two <strong>at</strong> a distance of 2.23m to the southwest of[019]; this was filled with a dark greyish brown silty clay, [021]. Most of the finds from thisgroup of post-holes were residual Roman ones. A single fragment of 19 th -20 th centuryglass, from fill [020], may provide a terminus post quem for the filling of these fe<strong>at</strong>uresbut, considering th<strong>at</strong> they are overlain by a Victorian layer, this might be intrusive,particularly as two other finds - a probable 17 th century sherd of <strong>An</strong>glo-Dutch Tin-glazedEarthenware, from fill [019], and a fragment of 17 th -19 th century CBM, from context [021]– are somewh<strong>at</strong> earlier in d<strong>at</strong>e.A short, shallow linear cut [029] was identified cutting layer [011] along the line of theRoman wall, [018]. This fe<strong>at</strong>ure was over 0.94m in length (extending beyond the limit of11© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190excav<strong>at</strong>ion), 0.37m wide and 0.05m deep. It is thought to be a scar caused by theremoval of bricks either during a wall robbing or site levelling episode. <strong>The</strong> fill, [030] wasa greyish brown grit and silt.Finally in the north-eastern corner of the trench, part of a sub-circular pit with an irregularprofile was observed cutting layer [011]. This pit, [013], measured 0.80m by 0.75m andwas 0.38m deep; it was filled by [012], a single fill of dark greyish brown silty clay.Above these fe<strong>at</strong>ures, the whole trench was covered by a thin layer of dark brown sandysilt subsoil, [009], which was 0.05m thick and contained post-medieval CBM.4.2.5 Victorian garden soil and l<strong>at</strong>er fe<strong>at</strong>uresDeposit [009] was in turn sealed by a 0.50m thick deposit of blackish brown sandy siltwith common grits and gravels, [008], th<strong>at</strong> was interpreted as a Victorian garden soil; itcontained 19 th -20 th century pottery as well as residual medieval peg tile and Romanpottery and CBM.Three pits cut through the garden soil layer. In the northern corner of the trench, part of alarge sub-circular pit, [015], with irregular profile was partially excav<strong>at</strong>ed in order to viewthe layers below the Roman plaster surface. It measured 1.10m by 0.90m and wasexcav<strong>at</strong>ed to a depth of 1.17m. Its fill, [014], was a dark brown sandy silt, containingpost-medieval wine bottles and brick rubble.Two further intercutting pits were excav<strong>at</strong>ed in the southern corner of the trench. <strong>The</strong>earlier of these, [028], measured 1.43m by 1.00m and was only observed to have adepth of 0.07m; however part of the upper extent of this pit was removed during themachine stripping of the trench. <strong>The</strong> fill of this fe<strong>at</strong>ure, [027], was a dark brown sandysilt.<strong>The</strong> l<strong>at</strong>er pit, [026], measured 2.10m by 0.45m and extended into the trench sections tothe south and east; it had straight, near vertical sides and a depth of 0.68m. <strong>The</strong> fill ofthis pit, [025], was a mid brown sandy silt with occasional gravels and contained 17 th –19 th century CBM.<strong>The</strong> bases of pits [028] and [026] were exactly <strong>at</strong> the level of the Roman mortar floor[049] and wall [037]. Although an <strong>at</strong>tempt had been made to break through the wall,cre<strong>at</strong>ing a scar through the upper course of bricks, this suggests th<strong>at</strong> the digging of19 th /20 th century pits was impeded by the underlying Roman masonry.Trench 2 was sealed by the car park tarmac surface, [007], which was 0.20m in depth.12© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190ContextNumberTypeDescriptionMax. DepositThickness (m)D<strong>at</strong>um m AOD007 Deposit Tarmac 0.20m 83.11008 Deposit Garden soil 0.50m 82.78009 Deposit Subsoil 0.05m 82.27010 Deposit Collapsed painted plaster 0.06m 82.13011 Deposit Clay rich abandonment 0.14m 82.25012 Deposit Fill of pit [013] 0.38m 82.10013 Cut Pit cut 0.38m 82.10014 Deposit Fill of pit [015] +1.17m 82.80015 Cut Pit cut +1.17m 82.80016 Deposit Fill of posthole [017] 0.20m 82.15017 Cut Posthole cut 0.20m 82.15018 Masonry Roman wall aligned NW - SE - 82.17019 Deposit Fill of posthole [020] 0.18m 82.07020 Cut Posthole cut 0.18m 82.07021 Deposit Fill of posthole [022] 0.18m 82.19022 Cut Posthole cut 0.18m 82.19025 Deposit Fill of pit [026] 0.68m 82.78026 Cut Pit cut 0.68m 82.78027 Deposit Fill of pit [028]-0.68m?028 Cut Pit cut-0.68m?029 Cut Scar in top of wall 018 0.05m 82.17030 Deposit Fill of ‘scar’ 029 0.05m 82.17035 Deposit Floor / demolition layer NW of wall [037] - 82.18036 Deposit Floor / demolition layer SE of wall [037] - 82.10037 Masonry Roman wall aligned NE – SW abutting [018] - 82.23048 Deposit Possible floor / demolition layer NE of wall [018] - -049 Deposit Mortar floor surface - 82.18Table 3: List of contexts in Trench 213© Archaeology South-East


5.0 THE FINDSArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111905.1 Summary5.1.1 A moder<strong>at</strong>e collection of finds was recovered during the excav<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong><strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>, <strong>St</strong> Albans, Hertfordshire. <strong>The</strong> finds are quantified in Appendix A.5.2 <strong>The</strong> Roman Pottery by <strong>An</strong>na Doherty5.2.1 IntroductionA small assemblage of Roman pottery, totalling 67 sherds, weighing 1230g, was handcollectedfrom the site, all of which had been redeposited in post-Roman fe<strong>at</strong>ures andlayers. <strong>The</strong>re appears to be a bias towards 1 st and 2 nd century pottery and whilst somefragments may be of 3 rd century d<strong>at</strong>e, none were certainly this l<strong>at</strong>e. However, given thesmall size of the assemblage and its lack of str<strong>at</strong>igraphic associ<strong>at</strong>ions, as well as thepresence of 4 th century coins on the site, this p<strong>at</strong>tern is not necessarily represent<strong>at</strong>ive ofthe d<strong>at</strong>ing of the underlying Roman archaeology.5.2.2 MethodologyIn the absence of a universal fabric and form type-series for Verulamium, the pottery hasbeen recorded using fabric and form codes in use in London (Marsh & Tyers 1979;Davies et al 1994). <strong>The</strong> pottery was examined using a x20 binocular microscope andquantified by sherd count and weight on pro-forma sheets, which form part of thearchive; the d<strong>at</strong>a was entered into an Excel spreadsheet.5.2.3 Early Roman pottery<strong>The</strong>re is a small quantity of demonstrably early Roman pottery in the assemblage,including an example of a Ritterling 8 samian cup and a small sherd of Lyon ware, bothof which can certainly be ascribed to the pre-Flavian period. Samian of south Gaulishorigin, d<strong>at</strong>able to the first century AD, is slightly better represented than l<strong>at</strong>er centralGaulish fabrics. One south Gaulish pl<strong>at</strong>ter fe<strong>at</strong>ures a partial stamp, probably reading[…..]IVI. Also certainly of 1 st century d<strong>at</strong>e is a sherd of ‘ring-and-dot’ beaker fabric, whilsttwo sherds of central Gaulish colour-co<strong>at</strong>ed ware d<strong>at</strong>e to the 1 st or early 2 nd century.<strong>The</strong>re are five grog-tempered sherds in the assemblage, including a simple necked jarform; almost all of these are sandy grog-tempered wares. At the Roman settlement <strong>at</strong>King Harry Lane, such wares were considered to be post-conquest in d<strong>at</strong>e and it wasnoted th<strong>at</strong> they appeared in both pre- and post Boudican deposits elsewhere inVerulamium (<strong>St</strong>ead & Rigby 1989, 65). <strong>The</strong>re is also an example of a simple beaded toeverted rim jar in fine black-surfaced ware, which is perhaps analogous to ‘Romanising’wares in Essex (Going 1987, 9).Although there were no str<strong>at</strong>ified groups in the assemblage, it is of note th<strong>at</strong> most of thesherds from the fill of the post-medieval lime kiln, [005], are grog-tempered wares orsouth Gaulish samian, and the sherd of Lyon ware was also found in the environmentalsample of [038], a basal fill of the lime kiln. This perhaps suggests th<strong>at</strong> the back-fill ofthis fe<strong>at</strong>ure derives from a rel<strong>at</strong>ively early Roman deposit.5.2.4 Other Roman pottery14© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190<strong>The</strong> majority of the assemblage is made up by undiagnostic grey and oxidisedbodysherds, of local origin which are not very closely d<strong>at</strong>able. <strong>An</strong>y forms associ<strong>at</strong>ed withthese wares tend to be generic jars and lids which could be of a wide chronologicalrange. <strong>The</strong>re are also a number of examples of the widely traded Verulamium regionwhite ware. <strong>The</strong> industry producing this l<strong>at</strong>ter ware was <strong>at</strong> its height in the 1 st to mid 2 ndcenturies, although <strong>at</strong> least one example of a reeded rim bowl appears to be a mid tol<strong>at</strong>e 2 nd century variant and another, fe<strong>at</strong>uring ‘parchment ware’ red-painted decor<strong>at</strong>ion,may be somewh<strong>at</strong> l<strong>at</strong>er in d<strong>at</strong>e.In general, mid Roman fabrics and forms seem to be the best represented. In terms offine wares, there is a single example of an 18/31R dish in Les Martres de Veyre samian(produced between AD100-120) and another bodysherd in Lezoux samian probably froma Ludowici Tf form (d<strong>at</strong>ed to AD150-200). <strong>The</strong>re is also a rough-cast, cornice-rim beakerin Colchester colour-co<strong>at</strong>ed ware d<strong>at</strong>ed to AD120-200.Coarse ware forms from this general period include an example of a fl<strong>at</strong> rim blackburnishedstyle bowl (d<strong>at</strong>ed to c. AD120-160) and three examples of the similar roundedrim variant (c. AD120-250/300). <strong>The</strong> l<strong>at</strong>est diagnostic sherd is an Oxfordshire white-waremortarium but this is of a rel<strong>at</strong>ively early form for this industry, probably d<strong>at</strong>ing to the l<strong>at</strong>e2 nd to mid 3 rd century.5.2.5 <strong>The</strong> amphoraOf particular note is a sherd from the neck/shoulder of an unusual amphora type. In theabsence of more diagnostic form elements, the vessel cannot be identified with certainty.However, its fabric type, which contains moder<strong>at</strong>e amounts of limestone as well as redand black iron rich inclusions and mica, is suggestive of a source in North Africa. <strong>The</strong>fabric is somewh<strong>at</strong> dissimilar to a reference example from a l<strong>at</strong>e Roman ‘Africana’ form.Instead the fabric and the general shoulder profile appear similar to Tripolitanian olive oilamphorae, which were produced throughout most of Roman period, but which are rare inBritain (Peacock & Williams form 36). This vessel exhibits a slight whiteish outer skin, <strong>at</strong>rait, probably rel<strong>at</strong>ed to the use of saline w<strong>at</strong>er, which is noted as characteristic of thisamphora type (Peacock and Williams 1986, 167). <strong>An</strong>other altern<strong>at</strong>ive is the Fishbourne148.3 form, which is of a similar fabric and possibly of rel<strong>at</strong>ed form. It has been d<strong>at</strong>ed bya limited number of str<strong>at</strong>igraphic associ<strong>at</strong>ions in Britain to AD50-150. This amphora typeis unsourced, and its contents are unknown, although <strong>at</strong> least one example has beenfound in Carthage, possibly also suggesting a North African source (Tomber & Dore1998, 92).5.3 <strong>The</strong> Post-Roman Pottery by Paul Blinkhorn5.3.1 <strong>The</strong> post-Roman pottery assemblage comprised 35 sherds with a total weight of 479g. Itwas almost entirely of post-medieval d<strong>at</strong>e, with the bulk of the m<strong>at</strong>erial being of 19 th or20 th century d<strong>at</strong>e. <strong>The</strong> following fabrics were noted:SW:TGE:?Early Medieval Shelly Ware. Wheel-turned, greyish-brown fabric withmoder<strong>at</strong>e shelly limestone up to 2mm. Outer surfaces are horizontally wiped. 2sherds, 80g.<strong>An</strong>glo-Dutch Tin-glazed Earthenware 17 th -early 18 th century (Orton 1988). Finewhite earthenware, occasionally pinkish or yellowish core. Thick white tin glaze,with painted cobalt blue or polychrome decor<strong>at</strong>ion. Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with a range oftable and display wares such as mugs, pl<strong>at</strong>es, dishes, bowls and vases. 115© Archaeology South-East


sherd, 5g.Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190GRE: Red Earthenware, 16 th -19 th century. Fine sandy earthenware, usually with abrown or green glaze, occurring in a range of utilitarian forms. Such 'countrypottery' was first made in the 16th century, and in some areas continued in useuntil the 19th century. 4 sherds, 131g.BW:EST:MOD:Border Ware, AD1550 - 1700. Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with a wide range of utilitarian andtablewares in a fine, white fabric with a bright green, yellow or brown glaze.Manufactured <strong>at</strong> a number of centres on the Surrey/Hampshire border and themain pottery type in London in the post-medieval period (Pearce 1988). 1 sherd,6g.English <strong>St</strong>oneware. (1680+). Hard, grey fabric, often with a brown, iron-richexterior wash. Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with a range of utilitarian vessels, particularly mugs.3 sherds, 28g.Miscellaneous 19 th and 20 th century wares. Mass-produced white earthenwares,stonewares etc. 24 sherds, 229g.5.3.2 <strong>The</strong> pottery occurrence by number and weight of sherds per context by fabric type isshown in Table 4. Each d<strong>at</strong>e should be regarded as a terminus post quem. Most of thefabrics are well-known finds in the region, although the sherds of Shelly Ware aresomewh<strong>at</strong> unusual. Post-Roman calcareous wares are not common finds in <strong>St</strong>. Albans,with most being either chalk-tempered or l<strong>at</strong>e Saxon <strong>St</strong>. Neots-type Ware (Turner-Rugg1995, 46). <strong>The</strong> sherds from this site are neither of these, and nor are they the 12 th – 13 thcentury shelly wares which form the bulk of assemblages of such d<strong>at</strong>e to the north of thisarea, in Northamptonshire, Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire (e.g. Blinkhorn 2005).Excav<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> the Abbey Orchard in the 1960s are said to have produced ‘a higherproportion of shell-tempered wares’ (Turner-Rugg 1995, 46), and a coin hoard of l<strong>at</strong>e9th-century d<strong>at</strong>e also occurred <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> site (Wilson and Hurst 1969, 233).5.3.3 <strong>The</strong> shelly fabric from this site has some similarities with L<strong>at</strong>e Saxon Shelly Ware (LSS),which is common in London during the 10 th -mid 11 th century (Vince 1985, 30-2), but suchvessels usually have sharply everted rims (e.g. ibid. Fig. 3), unlike the example fromcontext [008] (Fig 7, no 1) which has a high, almost upright rim, and the horizontal wipingon the shoulder of this sherd also appears untypical of the LSS tradition. Similarcomments apply when comparison is made with l<strong>at</strong>e Saxon Oxford Shelly Ware (Mellor1994, Fig. 39). It has been noted th<strong>at</strong> one of the calcareous wares from <strong>St</strong>. Albans issimilar to, but not the same as, LSS (Blackmore and Pearce 2010, 28), so it seems likelyth<strong>at</strong> the sherds from this site are th<strong>at</strong> local ware. <strong>The</strong>y appear most likely to be of 11 th or12 th century d<strong>at</strong>e, but more work will be required on such pottery in <strong>St</strong> Albans before thisd<strong>at</strong>ing can be advanced with certainty.5.3.4 <strong>The</strong> rest of the assemblage is post-medieval, with the bulk of it d<strong>at</strong>ing to the 18 th -19thcenturies. <strong>The</strong> sherd of TGE from context [019] is likely to be of 17 th century d<strong>at</strong>e, as arethe sherds of GRE. <strong>The</strong> sherd of Border Ware (Fig 7, no 2) is probably of l<strong>at</strong>e-16 th -17 thcentury d<strong>at</strong>e. It is from a vessel with an upright rim, almost certainly a porringer (Pearce1988, Fig. 26). <strong>The</strong> sherds of EST are all from mugs, as is common with such pottery.<strong>The</strong> remainder of the assemblage is made up by tablewares, such as pl<strong>at</strong>es, dishes,bowls and teapots, in mass-produced transfer-printed white earthenware of 19 th to 20 thcentury d<strong>at</strong>e.16© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190SW GRE BW TGE EST MODTrenchContextNoWeightNoWeightNoWeightNoWeightNoWeightNoWeightD<strong>at</strong>e2 U/S 1 6 U/S1 001 1 83 2 30 19thC1 004 1 1 17thC?2 008 2 80 1 31 1 6 2 22 20 155 20thC2 014 1 16 1 2 19thC2 019 1 5 17thC2 025 1 42 19thCTotal 2 80 4 131 1 6 1 5 3 28 24 229Table 4: Post-Roman pottery: occurrence by number and weight (in g) of sherds percontext by fabric type5.3.5 Illustr<strong>at</strong>ion C<strong>at</strong>alogueFig. 7.1: Context 8, fabric SW. Orange fabric with a grey core and browner outer surface;very fine wheel-rilling covers the shoulder. Body below the shoulder and rim collar andevenly and lightly sooted.Fig. 7.2: Context 8, fabric BW. White fabric with a glossy mottled green glaze on theinner surface.5.4 <strong>The</strong> Building M<strong>at</strong>erial by Sarah Porteus5.4.1 IntroductionA total of 331 fragments of building m<strong>at</strong>erial, with a combined weight of 30294g wererecovered from 15 numbered contexts. <strong>The</strong> assemblage consists of Roman, medievaland post-medieval m<strong>at</strong>erial (Table 5) and includes, brick, tegula, tessera, imbrex, mortarand opus signinum.Period Count Weight (g) Percentage of assemblageRoman 287 24942 85Medieval 9 1146 3Post-medieval 36 3334 10Und<strong>at</strong>ed 7 872 2Table 5: Summary of building m<strong>at</strong>erial recovered by period.5.4.2 MethodologyFabric and form have been quantified by weight, and count on pro-forma recordingsheets for archive and on an Excel spreadsheet. Fabrics have been identified with theaid of a x10 binocular microscope and compared with the Museum of London (MoL)fabric series where possible. For all other fabrics, a provisional site-specific fabric serieshas been drawn up. <strong>The</strong> assemblage has been retained with some items recommendedfor discard dependent upon the requirements of the receiving museum.5.4.3 <strong>The</strong> Roman Assemblage17© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Roman building m<strong>at</strong>erial was recovered from the following contexts: U/S, [001], [004],[005], [008], [009], [010], [011], [012], [014], [016], [019], [027], and [030].5.4.4 <strong>The</strong> Fabrics<strong>The</strong> fabric types on site were domin<strong>at</strong>ed by those from the MoL2815 group, fabrics madeof the local London red-firing clay, a group which includes sub groups MoL2452, 2459and 3006 Fabrics in the MoL2815 group generally have a red-brown to orange colourand a compact m<strong>at</strong>rix with few inclusions, with the exception of variable quantities of fineto very coarse quartz. D<strong>at</strong>ing of the individual fabric types varies; the vast majority of them<strong>at</strong>erial is fabric MoL3006 which is d<strong>at</strong>ed to AD50-160. A small quantity of fabricMoL2454 (and similar fabric MoL2453) is also represented; this is a pale yellowish brownor pink fabric with white clay inclusions and an often mottled clay m<strong>at</strong>rix. FabricMoL2454 is believed to origin<strong>at</strong>e from Eccles in Kent and has an earlier d<strong>at</strong>e range ofAD50-75/80. A fabric similar to MoL3023 was also present; this is a sandy fabric withabundant quartz and frequently with common black iron oxide grains and silty red ironoxide inclusions and is believed to d<strong>at</strong>e to AD 50-120.5.4.5 Mortar and renderMortar and render has been broadly divided into three c<strong>at</strong>egories:M1: yellow/cream coarse sandy lime mortarM2: Pale greyish white coarse sandy lime mortar,M3: finer pinkish creamy yellow medium sandy render: opus signinum consisting of CBMrich pinkish lime mortar was also identified.5.4.6 <strong>The</strong> FormsA range of forms were identified (Table 6) including roof tile (imbrex and tegula), tesserafrom flooring, wall plaster and possible fragments of flue tile from a hypocaust.Form Count Weight (g)Brick 37 7712Flue tile? 5 298Imbrex 36 2200Mortar 3 1130Opus signinum 24 1868Burned daub (with plaster scrim) 7 (1) 100 (18)Tegula 58 8446Tessera 11 216Tile 95 1648Grand Total 277 23636Table 6: Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of Roman building m<strong>at</strong>erial forms.5.4.7 Brick, tegula and imbrex<strong>The</strong> brick was mostly fragmentary; only one complete breadth of 215mm was presentand the majority of bricks were made of fabrics MoL3006 or 2549. A few fragments werein paler MoL2454 or 2453 fabrics. Only one fragment appeared to be he<strong>at</strong> affected,perhaps as a result of being used in a pilae stack. Tegula and imbrex fragments were18© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190mostly in fabrics MoL3006 and MoL2459, giving a general red appearance to the roof tilewith a few fragments of the paler MoL2454 fabric.5.4.8 Marks and ImprintsA small curved sign<strong>at</strong>ure mark was observed on a single brick fragment from context[010]. Context [014] contained a fragment of tegula with two arc sign<strong>at</strong>ure marks and asecond fragment with paw prints in the surface, possibly of a small dog. A further tegulafragment from context [009] had a possible sign<strong>at</strong>ure mark of two diverging fingerstrokes.5.4.9 TesseraA total of 11 tesserae were recovered from contexts [011], [012], [014], [025], [027],[030]. All tesserae are in the red firing clay fabrics MoL3006 and 2459. None of thefragments were recovered in situ, although it is almost certain th<strong>at</strong> part of the buildingwould have had a tessell<strong>at</strong>ed floor. <strong>The</strong> slightly irregular n<strong>at</strong>ure of the fragmentssuggests they are cut from reused brick or tegula or perhaps from kiln wasters of thesame.5.4.10 Flue tile<strong>The</strong> identific<strong>at</strong>ion of flue tile was uncertain. Only five fragments were identified andmostly identified by the presence of scored keying to one surface, and a thickness ofaround 15mm. A fragment from context [012] had diagonal incised linear keying andthree fragments from context [005] also had l<strong>at</strong>tice scoring. <strong>The</strong> final fragment was he<strong>at</strong>affected and had a possible vent cut but no keying was observed, possibly due to thesmall size of the fragment and spacing of keying. Early 1 st century box flue tiles oftenhave scored l<strong>at</strong>tice keying (Pringle 2006) supporting the idea, advanced after previousexcav<strong>at</strong>ions on the site, of an early Roman he<strong>at</strong>ed structure, possibly a b<strong>at</strong>h <strong>house</strong>, onthe site.5.4.11 Burnt DaubSeven fragments of burnt daub were recovered from context [005]. Burnt daub occurseither through accident by exposure to he<strong>at</strong> within the structure or through destruction ofthe building through fire. Some traces of fl<strong>at</strong> w<strong>at</strong>tle imprints were identified and a singlefragment had a trace of plaster scrim, indic<strong>at</strong>ing th<strong>at</strong> a w<strong>at</strong>tle and daub wall had beenpainted. Fragments of ‘decor<strong>at</strong>ed daub’ were recovered during the excav<strong>at</strong>ions of 1974and 1975 (Saunders unpublished) although the exact form of decor<strong>at</strong>ion is unknown assome p<strong>at</strong>terned combing and scoring can be observed on such fragments. P<strong>at</strong>terning isprobably to facilit<strong>at</strong>e the adherence of render or plaster to the surface, as has beenidentified within the present assemblage. Construction using w<strong>at</strong>tle and daub isassoci<strong>at</strong>ed with early Roman towns such as Verulamium and Colchester (Crummy1984).5.4.11 <strong>The</strong> post-Roman assemblageMedieval CBM was identified in two contexts: [004] and [009]; post-medieval CBM wasrecovered from contexts [001], [004], [008], [009], [011], [014], [021], [025].<strong>The</strong> post-Roman assemblage consists of peg tile, brick and a single floor brick. <strong>The</strong> assemblagehas been fully recorded for the archive but is not discussed further within this report.19© Archaeology South-East


5.4.12 <strong>St</strong>one building m<strong>at</strong>erialArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Two blocks of chalky limestone were recovered as a stone sample from context [005]weighing 1306g. This was identified on site as ‘clunch’ by Simon West and is a buildingstone quarried from the upper chalk <strong>at</strong> Totternhoe and used in <strong>St</strong> Albans and elsewherefrom the 13th Century.5.4.13 DiscussionA building excav<strong>at</strong>ed during the extension of the <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> in the 1970’s was of 1 stcentury d<strong>at</strong>e and all of the Roman CBM fabrics identified would be consistent with abuilding of this period and are comparable with those of early Roman structures knownfrom around the London such as those from Southwark (Crowley 2005) and suggestsmovement of ceramic building m<strong>at</strong>erials over reasonable distances within Roman Britain.<strong>The</strong> presence of plastered burned daub also possibly indic<strong>at</strong>es construction associ<strong>at</strong>edwith early structures on the site.5.5 <strong>The</strong> Painted Wall Plaster by Sarah Porteus5.5.1 IntroductionA total of 39 fragments of wall plaster with a combined weight of 4566g were recoveredfrom contexts [005], [010], [012], and [030]. Of these contexts, only [010] is believed tohave been an in situ deposit of collapsed plaster.5.5.2 Painted decor<strong>at</strong>ionFragments from context [010] (Fig 5) appear to show a border with a yellow stripe ofuncertain width next to a red border line, also of uncertain width bounding a possiblepanel of pale mint green. <strong>The</strong> possible panel has traces of black paint overlying and mayindic<strong>at</strong>e a decor<strong>at</strong>ive fe<strong>at</strong>ure but insufficient remains to reconstruct the image. Basedupon comparison with fragments of plaster recovered from context [005], it is likely th<strong>at</strong>the width of the dark red and yellow bands is approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 10mm. Also recovered fromcontext [010], were two sherds of white painted plaster, one with a dark red stripe withthin yellow edge in one corner of the fragment, with pink p<strong>at</strong>ches which may be he<strong>at</strong>damage or intentional colourContext [012] contained three fragments of painted plaster. One small fragment oforangeish red painted decor<strong>at</strong>ion and two conjoining fragments with decor<strong>at</strong>ive banding(Fig 5) Decor<strong>at</strong>ion consisted of a pale yellow strip of uncertain width, next to a 7mm wideblack band followed by a pale blue band of 7mm width and a grass green band withdiagonal black line of 4mm width. <strong>The</strong> fragments are likely to represent a border in adifferent colour scheme to those recovered from wall [010].Context [005] contained fragments of two broad colour schemes. Portions of borderdesign were present with yellow, white, dark red, white and pale mint green banding (Fig6). <strong>The</strong> deposit from which the fragments origin<strong>at</strong>e is mixed and these fragments mayrepresent a number of walls. One section shows a border of yellow (10mm wide) thenwhite (13mm wide), then yellow (10mm wide), bordering a panel or wide band of darkred, splashed with white (of unknown width) giving a marble effect. A second fragment ofthe splashed dark red paint remained with a painted white stripe (5mm width) and afurther possibly joining fragment with a dark red border (12mm), leading onto an area ofpale mint green, which may be a stripe or panel. A further fragment with the same mint20© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190green, joined with a dark red band (10mm) leading onto a yellow stripe. A further 3fragments with dark red decor<strong>at</strong>ion were also recovered: one with a painted area of palegreen, possibly traces of a panel design.5.5.3 Fabric<strong>The</strong> second colour scheme identified within context [005] was a pale mint green andwhite series of designs (Fig 6). Some fragments appeared as pale green backgroundwith white/cream lines which appear to form some sort of unidentified p<strong>at</strong>tern and otherfragments are white or cream with pale green painted marks over the top, again a likelyp<strong>at</strong>tern.A fragment of a possible decor<strong>at</strong>ive pilaster or dado was also recorded. <strong>The</strong> render onthe back of the piece is fl<strong>at</strong>, with a linear pointed column plastered face with white plasterand wash. A pinkish colour was noted to one side of the fragment and the other hadtraces of pale green paint; darker p<strong>at</strong>ches leading on from the pale green paint mayrepresent areas where the paint has been removed and may suggest a vine or foliagep<strong>at</strong>tern, but the fragment is too degraded to be certain. Decor<strong>at</strong>ive pilasters have beenfound from earlier excav<strong>at</strong>ions (Saunders unpublished) and were thought to form part ofthe ambul<strong>at</strong>ory around the b<strong>at</strong>h.<strong>The</strong> fabrics of mortar and render are described above (5.4.5). <strong>The</strong> plaster all overlay arender in coarse fabric M1 with a think plaster scrim of around 1mm thickness overlyingthe surface. <strong>The</strong> render (arrico) appeared to have been applied as one thick layer in themajority of cases; although incomplete, the thickness ranged from 15 to 40mm. Onlythree fragments appeared to have been painted over with more than one layer of render,all which were from context [005]. Two white painted plaster fragments had a primarylayer of M3 overlain by M1. One fragment of pale mint green painted plaster was basedon a finer background of M3 render. <strong>The</strong> slight pink discolour<strong>at</strong>ion of M3 was associ<strong>at</strong>edwith gre<strong>at</strong>er quantity of crushed ceramic m<strong>at</strong>erial within the render mix.No detailed analysis of the composition of the paint was undertaken although fragmentsof probable calcium copper silic<strong>at</strong>e (Egyptian blue) were clearly visible <strong>at</strong> x10magnific<strong>at</strong>ion, in the pale mint green paint and traces were also visible in some of thewhite paint. Fragments of white mica in the surface may also have given a slight sparkleto the surface of the plaster.5.5.4 Discussion<strong>The</strong> wall plaster varies from the plaster assemblage previously recovered from the site inth<strong>at</strong> the majority of the fragments have pale mint green and white decor<strong>at</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong>majority of fragments from the earlier excav<strong>at</strong>ion were in red and many bordersappeared to have black banding; although the former is fairly common in the currentassemblage, the l<strong>at</strong>ter is only represented by a single fragment. Plaster recovered fromcontext [010], seems to be wall plaster r<strong>at</strong>her than ceiling plaster and appears torepresent a red and yellow border with broader pale mint green panel, perhaps withsome black outlines for decor<strong>at</strong>ion.5.6 <strong>The</strong> Glass by Elke Raemen5.6.1 IntroductionA small assemblage consisting of 10 fragments of glass (wt 1836g) was recovered from21© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190three individually numbered contexts. <strong>The</strong> assemblage has been recorded in full on proforma sheets for archive and d<strong>at</strong>a has been entered onto a digital spreadsheet.5.6.2 Overview of the assemblage<strong>The</strong> earliest fragment consists of a wine bottle body sherd d<strong>at</strong>ing to the 18 th to mid 19 thcentury and was residual in layer [008]. L<strong>at</strong>e examples include a green glass wine orbeer bottle fragment of l<strong>at</strong>e 19 th - to 20 th -century d<strong>at</strong>e (context [020]) and a cylindricalclear glass bottle d<strong>at</strong>ing to the first half of the 20 th century is likely to have held mineralw<strong>at</strong>er (context [014]).5.7 <strong>The</strong> Clay Tobacco Pipe by Elke Raemen5.7.1 IntroductionA total of 11 stem fragments and three bowls were recovered during the archaeologicalwork. <strong>The</strong> l<strong>at</strong>ter contain decor<strong>at</strong>ion and maker’s marks and have therefore beenassigned a unique registered finds number (RF ). Bowls have been principallyclassified according to the London ‘Chronology of Bowl Types’ by Atkinson and Oswald(1969, 177-180; prefix AO). A detailed tabul<strong>at</strong>ed register of the entire assemblage hasbeen deposited as part of the archive.5.7.2 Overview of the AssemblageNone of the 11 stem fragments were marked or decor<strong>at</strong>ed. Most d<strong>at</strong>e to c. 1750-1910.<strong>The</strong> exception is a fragment from [005], d<strong>at</strong>ing to c. 1720-1800.5.7.3 All three bowls were recovered from context [008]. Bowl RF , of type AO27/28 andd<strong>at</strong>ing to c. 1780-1840, contained maker’s marks “WH” moulded in relief on either side ofthe spur. No makers with these initials have, as yet, been recorded as working in thisperiod in <strong>St</strong>. Albans. <strong>The</strong> bowl, most of which is missing, also retains part of the leafdecor<strong>at</strong>edseam. <strong>The</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> the pipe is burnished is of interest, as this indic<strong>at</strong>es aquality unusual in English pipes for this period. All other fe<strong>at</strong>ures however, clearlysuggest an English make and the pipe is likely to be local.5.7.4 Both remaining bowls d<strong>at</strong>e to c. 1780-1820 (AO27). Bowl RF is fluted with oakleaves on the surviving seam as well as further leaf decor<strong>at</strong>ion on the stem. A rosette ismoulded in relief on both sides of the spur. Bowl RF , is complete with corn ears onthe seams and displays a circle with central dot moulded in relief on either side of thespur. Neither of these makers’ symbols can be assigned to a specific producer and therosette especially was a symbol in use by a wide variety of makers.5.8 <strong>The</strong> Registered Finds by Trista Clifford5.8.1 Registered finds are washed, air dried or cleaned by a conserv<strong>at</strong>or as appropri<strong>at</strong>e to them<strong>at</strong>erial requirements. Objects have been packed appropri<strong>at</strong>ely in line with IFAguidelines (2001). All objects are assigned a unique registered find number (RF)and recorded on the basis of m<strong>at</strong>erial, object type and d<strong>at</strong>e. <strong>The</strong> Registered Finds aresummarised in Table 7, below. <strong>The</strong> clay tobacco pipe is considered in the relevantsection of Bulk Finds.5.8.2 Table 7: <strong>The</strong> Registered FindsRF number Context Object M<strong>at</strong>erial Period Wt (g)1 008 STUD COPP ROM


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190RF number Context Object M<strong>at</strong>erial Period Wt (g)5.8.3 Dress accessories3 008 CPIPE CERA PMED 44 008 CPIPE CERA PMED 65 u/s COIN COPP ROM


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190consists of a central convex oval flanked by two smaller ovals decor<strong>at</strong>ed with pairs ofincised lines. It is hollow, and the back filled with ?solder and the remains of an iron?spike. <strong>The</strong> objects most likely function is as a decor<strong>at</strong>ive mount or handle. It is ofuncertain d<strong>at</strong>e.5.8.9 CoinsFive unstr<strong>at</strong>ified 4 th century Nummi were recovered using a metal detector. A c<strong>at</strong>aloguehas been included as Appendix D.5.9 <strong>The</strong> Flintwork by Karine Le Hégar<strong>at</strong>5.9.1 A small collection, comprising just six struck flints, weighing 36g and six burnt unworkedflints, weighing 14g were recovered (Table 8). <strong>The</strong> struck flints were manufactured fromlight brown to dark grey fine grained flint with a fine abraded buff cortex. <strong>The</strong> majority ofthe pieces displayed moder<strong>at</strong>e post depositional edge damage, suggesting th<strong>at</strong> them<strong>at</strong>erial had undergone a small degree of post-depositional disturbance. <strong>The</strong> artefactsrepresent pieces of flint debitage. <strong>The</strong>y included a sh<strong>at</strong>tered piece, two flake fragmentsand three complete flakes. <strong>The</strong> artefacts recovered from pit fill [025] in Trench 2 andfrom the upper fill, [005], of lime kiln [006] in Trench 1 exhibited no technical traits toassist with d<strong>at</strong>ing. <strong>The</strong> distal end of a flake recovered from the garden soil [008] (Trench2) and the medial part of a flake found while processing sample from pit fill context[012] (Trench 2) exhibited flake scar removals on the dorsal face, typical of theMesolithic and Neolithic periods. Previous archaeological work <strong>at</strong> the site yielded a smallassemblage of sc<strong>at</strong>tered flints including blades of a possible Mesolithic d<strong>at</strong>e (Saundersunpublished).Context Flake Broken flakeSh<strong>at</strong>teredpieceBurnt unworked flint -No./Wt. (g)[005] 1[008] 1 4/4[012] 1 1[014] 2/10[025] 1 1TOTALS 3 2 1 6/14Table 8: Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of the flintwork5.10 <strong>The</strong> Bulk Metalwork by Trista Clifford5.10.1 A total of 31 iron nails were recovered from five separ<strong>at</strong>e contexts, including anunstr<strong>at</strong>ified group recovered by metal detector.5.10.2 <strong>The</strong> vast majority are general purpose nails with circular heads and tapering squaresectioned stems (Manning Type I) with lengths between 20-80mm. It is likely th<strong>at</strong> manyof these nails are of Roman d<strong>at</strong>e.5.10.3 Context [014] contained general purpose nails with circular sectioned stems which are19th-20th century in d<strong>at</strong>e. Context [025] contained a single clenched heavy duty nailwhich is probably structural in origin and also of 19th century d<strong>at</strong>e.5.10.4 Several unstr<strong>at</strong>ified amorphous corroded lumps of iron were also recovered.24© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111905.10.5 A single piece of lead waste came from sample , context [12]. Two unstr<strong>at</strong>ified leadwaste off cuts were also recovered.5.11 <strong>The</strong> Mammal, Bird and Fish Bone by Gemma Ayton5.11.1 Introduction<strong>The</strong> animal bone assemblage contains 212 fragments of bone of which 111 can beidentified to taxa. <strong>The</strong> assemblage has been retrieved through hand-collection and fromenvironmental samples and is in a good to moder<strong>at</strong>e condition with some largefragments remaining but no complete bones. <strong>The</strong> majority of the unidentifiablespecimens derive from the sample m<strong>at</strong>erial which contained smaller, we<strong>at</strong>heredfragments. C<strong>at</strong>tle, sheep/go<strong>at</strong>, pig, horse, c<strong>at</strong>, bird and fish bones have been identifiedand Table 1 presents the NISP (Number of Identified Specimens) counts for each taxa.TAXANISPC<strong>at</strong>tle 20Sheep/Go<strong>at</strong> 4Pig 6Horse 1C<strong>at</strong> 2Bird 11Fish 3Large Mammal 57Medium Mammal 7TOTAL 111Table 9: NISP counts5.11.2 Overview of assemblage<strong>The</strong> majority of the bird bones were identified as domestic fowl (Gallus gallus) though alarge, juvenile humerus was also recovered th<strong>at</strong> may be greylag/domestic goose (<strong>An</strong>seranser). A proximal metacarpal has been positively identified as sheep using the criteriaoutlined by Boessneck et al (1964). Horse is represented by a single metacarpalrecovered from context [004], the proximal end of which shows signs of exostosis andlipping around the articular surface.Context [005] contains 48 large mammal long bone fragments which may derive from thesplitting of the bones to retrieve the marrow. Cut marks were also noted on the distalarticul<strong>at</strong>ions of one sheep and two c<strong>at</strong>tle humeri from the same context, suggesting th<strong>at</strong>these bones derive from butchery waste. It is uncertain whether this assemblage iscontemporary with the back-fill of the post-medieval lime kiln, or like the majority ofd<strong>at</strong>able finds from this context, derives from early Roman deposits. <strong>The</strong> animal bone ishowever, in good condition.<strong>The</strong> assemblage is too small to make any significant comments regarding animalhusbandry though evidence indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> context [005] may have been utilised as adumping ground for butchery waste.25© Archaeology South-East


5.12 <strong>The</strong> Shell by Trista CliffordArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111905.12.1 <strong>The</strong> lower valve of a common oyster, Ostrea edulis, was recovered from context [27].<strong>An</strong> upper valve fragment also came from context [5].26© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111906.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES by Karine Le Hégar<strong>at</strong>6.1 Introduction6.1.1 A total of eight bulk soil samples were taken to establish evidence for environmentalindic<strong>at</strong>ors such as wood charcoal, charred macrobotanical remains, fauna and molluscaas well as to assist finds recovery. Samples were taken from a range of fe<strong>at</strong>ures in bothtrenches. Context [014], from which sample was extracted, yielded some Victorianpottery and both contexts [005] and [033], from which samples and wererespectively taken, revealed artefacts d<strong>at</strong>ing from different periods. Only five of thesamples () considered to have been collected from more suitablecontexts were processed. One sample derived from a post-medieval lime kiln excav<strong>at</strong>edin Trench 1. <strong>The</strong> sample was extracted from the basal fill and the he<strong>at</strong> modified n<strong>at</strong>uralclay lining the base of the kiln. <strong>The</strong> remaining four samples came from post-medievalfe<strong>at</strong>ures investig<strong>at</strong>ed in Trench 2; they included a pit and three postholes.6.2 Method6.2.1 <strong>The</strong> samples were processed in a flot<strong>at</strong>ion tank; the flots and residues were captured on250µm and 500µm meshes and were air dried prior to sorting. <strong>The</strong> residues were sievedthrough 4mm and 2mm geological sieves and each fraction sorted for environmental andartefactual remains. <strong>The</strong> flots were scanned under a stereozoom microscope <strong>at</strong> x7-45magnific<strong>at</strong>ions. Preliminary identific<strong>at</strong>ions were made for the macrobotancial remains bycomparing them with specimens documented in reference manuals (Cappers et al. 2006,Jacomet 2006, NIAB 2004). Nomencl<strong>at</strong>ure used follows <strong>St</strong>ace (1997).6.3 Results6.3.1 <strong>The</strong> results are presented on a sample by sample basis and a full tabul<strong>at</strong>ed overview ofthe sample contents is recorded in Appendices B and C.6.3.2 Sample (Trench 1)Sample , taken from the primary fill, [039] and he<strong>at</strong> scorched modified n<strong>at</strong>ural clay[038], which lined kiln [006], produced a very small assemblage of wood charcoalfragments which were principally small in size (4mm in size, although the majority of thepieces were smaller (


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190comprising pottery, CBM, fired clay, metal, a possible lead object, burnt and unburnt flint,glass and industrial debris (slag and vesicular m<strong>at</strong>erial).6.3.4 Sample (Trench 2)A small assemblage of charcoal consisting mainly of small-sized fragments


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190surfaces. <strong>The</strong> charred chaff elements - and a significant proportion of the charredwild/weed seeds - were also fragmented, suggesting th<strong>at</strong> the assemblages of charredmacroplants have been subject to repe<strong>at</strong>ed phases of deposition or redeposition.6.4.3 <strong>The</strong>se four fe<strong>at</strong>ures produced rel<strong>at</strong>ively similar assemblages of charred macrobotanicals,including a small quantity of whe<strong>at</strong> grains and barley as well as infrequent chaffcomponents, leguminous seeds and wild/weed seeds. <strong>The</strong> poor preserv<strong>at</strong>ion of thecharred caryopses of whe<strong>at</strong> prevented any identific<strong>at</strong>ions beyond the genus level,although they probably included spelt, as the species was identified from the chaffelements. Spelt whe<strong>at</strong> (Triticum spelta) tends to characterised the main hulled whe<strong>at</strong>species recovered from Roman sites (Greig 1991). However, given th<strong>at</strong> the remainsorigin<strong>at</strong>ed from post-medieval fe<strong>at</strong>ures, free-threshing whe<strong>at</strong> might also be representedin these assemblages. <strong>The</strong> presence of charred processing residues (chaff componentsand wild/weed seeds) is highly indic<strong>at</strong>ive of domestic activities rel<strong>at</strong>ing to cropprocessing. In order to protect the grains, hulled whe<strong>at</strong> was sometimes stored in spikeletform, the grains being routinely separ<strong>at</strong>ed from the glumes before being ground (Hillman1981). However, no significant assemblages have been observed and this activity couldhave taken place elsewhere.6.4.4 <strong>The</strong> assemblage of macrobotanical remains provides limited evidence for the use of arange of crops and for processing activities; however, the small quantity of charredmacroplants probably represents sc<strong>at</strong>tered detritus derived from accidental burningevents. <strong>The</strong> debris would have been incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed unintentionally in the post-medievalfe<strong>at</strong>ures as part of the backfills.6.4.5 Wood charcoal fragments were found in all five samples. However, the assemblageswere very limited. <strong>The</strong> fragments were principally small and the preserv<strong>at</strong>ion was poor.No identific<strong>at</strong>ions have been undertaken as the d<strong>at</strong>a would be limited and provide limitedindic<strong>at</strong>ion of the woody taxa targeted for fuel or of the veget<strong>at</strong>ion environment. Vitrifiedfragments of charcoal were noticed within the assemblages. Vitrific<strong>at</strong>ion of woodcharcoal can result from charring <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ures. <strong>The</strong>se are often associ<strong>at</strong>ed withfires used for industrial purposes. For example, making lime requires temper<strong>at</strong>uresreaching up to 900°C (Hale, J. et al. 2003, Tierney M. et al. 2009) and although no largeassemblage of charcoal was found in the basal layer of the kiln, some of the vitrifiedcharcoal could still be associ<strong>at</strong>ed with this activity. However, large quantities of charcoaland lime residues, which might be expected <strong>at</strong> the base of such a fe<strong>at</strong>ure, were notencountered, perhaps suggesting th<strong>at</strong> the kiln was cleaned out following its final use.Context [38/39] produced hard fragments of n<strong>at</strong>ural deposits displaying thin grey layers,suggesting repetitive baking <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ures.29© Archaeology South-East


7.0 DISCUSSIONArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111907.1 Introduction7.1.1 <strong>The</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ure of the excav<strong>at</strong>ion as a televised outreach project to elucid<strong>at</strong>e thearchaeology of <strong>St</strong> Albans and the methods and experience of archaeology meant th<strong>at</strong>the fe<strong>at</strong>ures encountered were under no unavoidable thre<strong>at</strong>. <strong>The</strong> restricted budget fordealing with artefact assemblages and str<strong>at</strong>igraphy also meant th<strong>at</strong> a low impactexcav<strong>at</strong>ion str<strong>at</strong>egy was adopted. As a result there was very little excav<strong>at</strong>ion of str<strong>at</strong>ifieddeposits and fe<strong>at</strong>ures, and where this was undertaken it was in the l<strong>at</strong>est phases of thesite history and the overburden.7.1 Rel<strong>at</strong>ionship of Roman <strong>St</strong>ructures to the Previously Identified Buildings (Fig 8)7.1.1 Significant str<strong>at</strong>ified archaeological fe<strong>at</strong>ures were identified rel<strong>at</strong>ing to the Romandevelopment of <strong>St</strong> Albans. Most significantly, these rel<strong>at</strong>e to the building previouslyidentified in the 1970’s as a possible b<strong>at</strong>h-<strong>house</strong>. <strong>The</strong> site archive of the previous <strong>Six</strong><strong>Bells</strong> excav<strong>at</strong>ions was not available and so it was not possible to make any assessmentof the levels <strong>at</strong> which the Roman structures were encountered and any correl<strong>at</strong>ions areonly made from plan d<strong>at</strong>a. Furthermore the synthesised reports of the earlierexcav<strong>at</strong>ions available often tre<strong>at</strong>ed the str<strong>at</strong>igraphy in generalised terms and the drawnplans available were georeferenced from obscure scalings to the architect’s drawings ofthe pub and from these to the ordnance survey plans. For this reason, direct correl<strong>at</strong>ionsare not possible.7.1.2 It is clear however, th<strong>at</strong> the north-west south-east orient<strong>at</strong>ed wall, [018], is on the samealignment as Walls ‘C/D’ of the proposed b<strong>at</strong>h-<strong>house</strong> in Saunders’ (unpublished) report.In terms of construction, wall [018] m<strong>at</strong>ches ‘Wall D’, which ‘was built of ne<strong>at</strong>ly coursedbricks’ whereas the outer part (Wall C) had been ‘formed of mortared flints’ (ibid). Thiswas interpreted as the inner wall of a sunken pool, forming the frigidarium of a b<strong>at</strong>h<strong>house</strong>.<strong>The</strong> wall was suggested to divide the pool from an ambul<strong>at</strong>ory, runningalongside.7.1.3 Whilst it is not absolutely certain th<strong>at</strong> both are from the same building, it seems likely th<strong>at</strong>they form part of a complex of a significant size, extending along this axis for <strong>at</strong> least 24metres. However, the presence of wall [037], which clearly forms an internal partition,suggests th<strong>at</strong>, if the space between walls A and C/D was an ambul<strong>at</strong>ory, it did notextend beyond [037].7.1.4 Only a very small amount of possible box flue or pilae tile was recovered, so the currentexcav<strong>at</strong>ions did not provide clear supporting evidence for Saunders’ b<strong>at</strong>h-<strong>house</strong>interpret<strong>at</strong>ion. Having said this, the presence of painted wall plaster, probably fromseveral different painted walls certainly suggests a building of some st<strong>at</strong>us and, if therecorded masonry is all from the same structure, its very large size may suggest animportant <strong>public</strong> building.7.1.5 <strong>The</strong>re was no sign of the external pilastered wall (‘Wall A’ in Saunders’ report) withinTrench 2, but this was to be expected as the alignment would put it beyond the westernend of the trench.7.1.6 Trench 1 showed no signs of Roman structures and this therefore seems to confirm theinterpret<strong>at</strong>ion of ‘Wall A’ in the 1970’s excav<strong>at</strong>ions as an external wall, and furthersuggests th<strong>at</strong> there were no structures within 5.5 meters of the Roman building complex30© Archaeology South-East


on its western side.Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111907.1.7 Within Trench 1 there was no surviving trace of the earliest clay wall and timber structureidentified in the earlier excav<strong>at</strong>ions (‘Wall A’ – Fig. 8). This wall was orient<strong>at</strong>ed northeastto southwest and to the southeast of the trench. However, several fragments of daub,thought to derive from early structures, were recovered from the upper fill of the postmedievallime kiln in this trench.7.2 In Situ Collapsed Plaster7.2.1 It is unclear exactly where the painted plaster layer, [010], origin<strong>at</strong>ed; it appears th<strong>at</strong> thelimit of this deposit is closely associ<strong>at</strong>ed with wall [018] but it is possible th<strong>at</strong> it origin<strong>at</strong>esfrom an unidentified wall to the east of Trench 2 or from a ceiling; however the wallplaster itself was considered more likely to be from a wall than a ceiling (see 5.5.4).7.3 <strong>The</strong> L<strong>at</strong>er Roman to Medieval Period7.3.1 Although it is likely th<strong>at</strong> the walls in Trench 2 were constructed in the early Romanperiod, no d<strong>at</strong>ing m<strong>at</strong>erial was recovered from probable Roman floors or layers buttingthese structures. <strong>The</strong> lack of l<strong>at</strong>er Roman pottery may suggest th<strong>at</strong> the building went outof use in the 2 nd century, although the presence of 4 th century coins from the overburdenidentified by metal detecting may allude to l<strong>at</strong>er Roman phases.7.3.2 <strong>The</strong> Roman deposits were directly overlain by a deposit, [011], containing post-medievalpeg tile. Although two sherds of medieval pottery were recovered as residual finds, therewas no evidence of substantial activity rel<strong>at</strong>ing to this period.7.4 Post-Medieval Activity7.4.1 <strong>The</strong> three post-medieval postholes in Trench 2 are likely to be from the same structure,although its overall form and extent was not determined, so its function remainsuncertain. Although one (possibly intrusive) fragment of 19 th -20 th century glass wasrecovered, the rest of the limited finds assemblage may suggest this structure is as earlyas 17 th century in d<strong>at</strong>e.7.4.2 At some point in the Victorian period, the area of Trench 2 may have changed in functionfrom containing <strong>at</strong> least one structure to being used as an outside space, represented bythe thick deposit of garden soil. <strong>The</strong> l<strong>at</strong>est fe<strong>at</strong>ures cutting the garden soil are likely to berefuse pits or other garden fe<strong>at</strong>ures.7.4.3 Fe<strong>at</strong>ure [006], identified in Trench 1, is suggestive of a lime kiln th<strong>at</strong> fell out of use in the18 th or 19 th centuries. Its characteristics are of a heavily, and apparently repe<strong>at</strong>edly,burnt pit some 2.60 metres in diameter, with near vertical sides and with a thick richchalky deposit <strong>at</strong> its base. Even though the pit was not excav<strong>at</strong>ed to its base, the augersounding penetr<strong>at</strong>ed through the chalky deposit and into a burnt clay deposit and thisboundary was interpreted as the base of the cut; no lining m<strong>at</strong>erial was encountered.7.4.4 However this interpret<strong>at</strong>ion is not without problems. It would be usual to see a lining ofvitrified bricks in a lime kiln of this d<strong>at</strong>e and none was observed in the sides or in thebase. Similarly, surprisingly little charcoal was recovered from the environmental sampleof the primary fill of this fe<strong>at</strong>ure, although this might be explained by thorough cleaning ofthe fe<strong>at</strong>ure after its final use. <strong>The</strong> presence of vitrified charcoal in environmental samplesis however, suggestive of industrial processes, involving burning <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ures,31© Archaeology South-East


taking place in the vicinity.Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 20111907.4.5 <strong>The</strong>re were no other structures associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the kiln, so it is difficult to place it intoany wider context of land-use. <strong>The</strong> significant quantity of butchery waste, rel<strong>at</strong>ing to theextraction of marrow, recovered from [005], the upper fill of this fe<strong>at</strong>ure, is however, ofsome note. Although it is considered unlikely th<strong>at</strong> this fe<strong>at</strong>ure was used as a primaryrubbish dump for butchery waste and it is quite feasible th<strong>at</strong> the animal bone wasredeposited from Roman layers, it nevertheless provides some possible evidence forvarious different activities happening in quite close proximity in the post-medieval period.7.4.6 It is unclear whether the post-medieval structure or any of the cut fe<strong>at</strong>ures have anyassoci<strong>at</strong>ion with <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong>. <strong>The</strong> presence of an industrial fe<strong>at</strong>ure in Trench 1suggests th<strong>at</strong> this lay beyond any external space directly used by the pub. By theVictorian period, Trench 2 seems to have been an open exterior space although it ispossible th<strong>at</strong> rubbish pits cut through the Victorian garden soil were dug toaccommod<strong>at</strong>e waste from the pub.32© Archaeology South-East


BIBLIOGRAPHYArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190ASE 2011, Written Scheme of Investig<strong>at</strong>ion: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong>, 16-18 <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> Albans,Hertfordshire AL3 4SH, Unpublished documentAtkinson D R and Oswald A 1969 London clay tobacco pipes, J British Archaeol Assoc 32, 171–227.BGS 2011, British Geological Survey, Geology of Britain Viewer, Accessed online 24.08.11 <strong>at</strong>http://maps.bgs.ac.uk/geologyviewer_google/googleviewer.htmlBlackmore, L, and Pearce, J, 2010, A d<strong>at</strong>ed type-series of London medieval pottery : Part 5.Shelly-sandy ware and the greyware industries MOLA Monograph 49Blinkhorn, P, 2005 <strong>The</strong> Saxon and Medieval Pottery in A Maul and A Chapman 2005, AMedieval Mo<strong>at</strong>ed Enclosure in Tempsford Park. Bedfordshire Archaeol Monog 5, 53 – 70Boessneck, J, Muller, H-H and Teichert, M, 1964, Osteologische Unterscheidungmerkmalezwischen Schaf (Ovies aries Linne) und Ziege (Capra hircus Linne) Kuhn-Archiv 78, 5-129.Cappers, R.T.J., Bekker R.M. & Jans J.E.A. 2006. Digital Seed Atlas of the Netherlands.Groningen <strong>Archaeological</strong> Series 4. Barkhuis, Netherlands.Crowley, N. 2005 Building m<strong>at</strong>erials. In B. Yule (ed.) A Prestigious Roman Building Complex onthe Southwark W<strong>at</strong>erfront. MoLAS monograph 23: 90-103.Crummy, N, 1983 Colchester <strong>Archaeological</strong> Report 2: <strong>The</strong> Roman Small Finds fromExcav<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> Colchester 1971-79, Colchester <strong>Archaeological</strong> TrustCrummy, P., 1984 Excav<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> Lion Walk, Balkerne Lane and Middleborough, Colchester,Essex, Colchester Archaeol. Rep. 3 (Colchester <strong>Archaeological</strong> Trust)Davies, B.J., Richardson, B. and Tomber, R.S. 1994. A D<strong>at</strong>ed Corpus of Early Roman Potteryfrom the City of London. <strong>The</strong> Archaeology of Roman London Vol 5. CBA ResearchReport 98Frere, S 1984 Verulamium Excav<strong>at</strong>ions Volume III Oxford University Committee for ArchaeologyMonograph 3 OxfordGreig, J. R. A. 1991. <strong>The</strong> British Isles. In van Zeist, W., Wasylikowa, K., and Behre, K.-E.,editors, Progress in Old World Palaeoethnobotany: A Retrospective View on theOccassion of 20 Years of the Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Work Group for Palaeoethnobotany, pages299-334. A. A. Balkema.Going, C.J. 1987. <strong>The</strong> Mansio and Other Sites in the South-Eastern Sector of Caesaromagus:<strong>The</strong> Roman Pottery. CBA Res. Rep. 62: LondonHale, J., Heinemeier, J., Lancasre, L. Lindroos, A. and Ringbom, A. 2003. D<strong>at</strong>ing ancientmortar, American Scientist 91 (No 2) 130-137.Hillman, G. 1981. Reconstructing crop husbandry practices from charred remains of crops. In R.Mercer (eds) Farming practice in British prehistory. Edinburgh University Press,33© Archaeology South-East


Edinburgh.Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190IFA, 2000 <strong>St</strong>andard and Guidance for the collection, document<strong>at</strong>ion, conserv<strong>at</strong>ion and researchof archaeological m<strong>at</strong>erials,www.archaeologists.net/modules/icontent/inPages/docs/codes/finds%20standard%202001.pdf accessed on 25/09/07IFA, 2008, <strong>The</strong> Institute of Field Archaeologists, <strong>St</strong>andards and guidance for an archaeologicalfield evalu<strong>at</strong>ion published online <strong>at</strong> www.archaeologists.net Accessed 24.08.11Jacomet, S. 2006. Identific<strong>at</strong>ion of cereal remains from archaeological sites. 2 nd ed.Archaeobotany labor<strong>at</strong>ory, IPAS, Basel University, Unpublished manuscript.Marsh, G. and Tyers, P. 1979. <strong>The</strong> Roman pottery from Southwark, Southwark Excav<strong>at</strong>ions1972–74. LAMAS and Surrey Arch reprintMellor, M, 1994 Oxford Pottery: A Synthesis of middle and l<strong>at</strong>e Saxon, medieval and early postmedievalpottery in the Oxford Region Oxoniensia 59, 17-217MoLAS, 1994, MoLAS <strong>Archaeological</strong> Site Manual; Third Edition (1994)NIAB. 2004. Seed Identific<strong>at</strong>ion Handbook: Agricultural, Horticulture and Weeds. 2 nd ed. NIABCambridge.Orton, C, 1988 Post-Roman Pottery in P Hinton (ed.) Excav<strong>at</strong>ions in Southwark 1973-76 andLambeth 1973-79. MoLAS and DGLA Joint Public<strong>at</strong>ion 3, 295-364Peacock, DPS, and Williams, DF, 1986, Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductoryguide, Longman: London and New YorkPearce, J, 1988, Border Wares HMSOPringle, S. 2006 Early Box Flue Tiles from London London Archaeologist (Summer 2006)Saunders, C. Unpublished Excav<strong>at</strong>ions in Verulamium Insula XIX(<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong>, S. <strong>St</strong> Michael’s)1974-5.<strong>St</strong> Albans District Council (SADC) 2005, <strong>An</strong> <strong>Archaeological</strong> <strong>St</strong>r<strong>at</strong>egy For Historic Centre Of <strong>St</strong>Albans, unpub grey liter<strong>at</strong>ure report<strong>St</strong>ace, C. 1997. New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.<strong>St</strong>ead, IM, and Rigby, V, 1989, Verulamium: the King Harry Lane site, English Heritage<strong>Archaeological</strong> Report no 12: LondonTierney, M., Johnston P. and Harte A. 2009. <strong>Archaeological</strong> Excav<strong>at</strong>ion Report, E0626,Bricketstown , Co. Wexford., Kiln and Field systems., Echtra Journal, Issue 4.Tomber, R. and Dore, J. 1998. <strong>The</strong> N<strong>at</strong>ional Roman Fabric Reference Collection: a Handbook.Museum of London Archaeology Service: LondonTurner-Rugg, A, 1995 Medieval Pottery from <strong>St</strong>. Albans Medieval Ceramics 19, 45-66Vince, AG, 1985, <strong>The</strong> Saxon and Medieval Pottery of London: A review Medieval Archaeology34© Archaeology South-East


29, 25-93Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Wilson, DM, and Hurst, DG, 1969, Medieval Britain in 1968, Medieval Archaeology 13, 230-87Wilson, DR, Wright, RP, Hassall, MWC and Tomlin, RSO, 1975, Roman Britain in 1974,Britannia 6, 221-28335© Archaeology South-East


AcknowledgementsArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190ASE would like to thank Oxford Scientific Films for commissioning the work and Simon West, <strong>St</strong>Albans District Archaeologist for his continued guidance throughout the project. Thanks are alsoextended to all the staff <strong>at</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> pub.36© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Appendix A: Quantific<strong>at</strong>ion of findsContextPotterywt (g)CBMwt (g)Bonewt (g)Shellwt (g)Flintwt (g)FCFwt (g)<strong>St</strong>onewt (g)Ironwt (g)Wall plasterwt (g)F Claywt (g)CTPwt (g)Glasswt (g)Leadwt (g)plasticwt (g)1 5 190 5 900 1


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Appendix B: Residue quantific<strong>at</strong>ion (* = 1-10, ** = 11-50, *** = 51-250, **** = >250) and weights in gramsSample NumberContextContext / deposit typeSample Volume litressub-Sample Volume litresCharcoal >4mmWeight (g)Charcoal


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Appendix C: Flot quantific<strong>at</strong>ion (*=1-10, ** = 11-50, *** = 51-250, **** = >250) and preserv<strong>at</strong>ion (+ = poor, ++ = moder<strong>at</strong>e, +++ = good)Sample NumberContextweight g1 12 40Flot volume mlUncharred %sediment %110 55 10seeds uncharredCharcoal >4mmCharcoal


40Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190© Archaeology South-EastSample NumberContextweight gFlot volume mlUncharred %sediment %seeds uncharredCharcoal >4mmCharcoal


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Appendix D: Coin c<strong>at</strong>alogueNo RF no Denomin<strong>at</strong>ion Reverse legend Reverse type Emperor Obverse legend Obverse type Reece period Diam mm DAM Cxt1 7 Nummus[VICTORIAE DDAVGGQ NN] Two victoriesHouse of Constantine,343-48 Illeg?Diademnedbust r. 17 13.4 6 u/s2 6 Nummus[FE]L T[EMPREPARATI]OSoldier spearing?barbarianHouse of Constantine,343-61 Illeg?Diademnedbust r. 18 14.2 6 u/s3 8 Nummus[FE]L T[EMPREPARATI]OSoldier spearing?barbarianHouse of Constantine,343-61 Illeg?Diademnedbust r. 18 13.3 6 u/s4 5 Nummus Illeg Illeg Illeg, 294-402 Illeg Illeg 12.6 u/s5 9Radi<strong>at</strong>e ornummus Illeg Illeg Illeg, 260-402 Illeg Illeg 19.3 u/s41© Archaeology South-East


SMR Summary FormArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Site Code SXB 11Identific<strong>at</strong>ion Name <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong>and Address 16-18 <strong>St</strong>. Michaels <strong>St</strong>reet<strong>St</strong> Albans, Hertfordshire AL3 4SHCounty, District &/or <strong>St</strong> AlbansBoroughOS Grid Refs. NGR 513677 207398GeologyUndifferenti<strong>at</strong>ed River Terrace Deposits over Lewes Nodular andSeaford Chalk Form<strong>at</strong>ionsArch. South-East 4872Project NumberType of Fieldwork Eval. Excav. W<strong>at</strong>chingbrief.<strong>St</strong>anding<strong>St</strong>ructureSurveyOtherType of Site Green Shallow Deep OtherField Urban UrbanD<strong>at</strong>es of Fieldwork Eval. Excav. W.B. Other11-08-11to15-08-11Sponsor/Client Oxford Scientific FilmsProject Manager Jon SygraveProject Supervisor Dylan HopkinsonPeriod Summary Palaeo. Meso. Neo. BA IA RB AS MED PM Other Modern<strong>The</strong> site lies within the walls of Roman Verulamium and Roman structures interpreted as a b<strong>at</strong>h<strong>house</strong>had been previously identified on the site during the extension of the pub buildings in 1974-5. Two trenches were excav<strong>at</strong>ed by Archaeology South-East in order to further assess the extentof these structures, and to demonstr<strong>at</strong>e archaeological procedures and local history to the wider<strong>public</strong>.According to the British Geological Survey (Sheet 239 - Hertford) the site lies on an area ofundifferenti<strong>at</strong>ed River Terrace Deposits which rise to the south west from the current alluvial floodplain of the River Ver. <strong>The</strong> underlying solid geology comprises Lewes Nodular and Seaford ChalkForm<strong>at</strong>ions. Trench one encountered clay Brickearth deposits <strong>at</strong> a depth of 81.97m. <strong>The</strong> limit ofexcav<strong>at</strong>ion in trench two was <strong>at</strong> 81.62m AOD where a small post medieval pit exposed a layer ofRoman gravel rich clay containing plaster fragments, n<strong>at</strong>ural deposits were not encountered in thistrench.Trench two to the rear of the car-park identified two abutting Roman walls, one of which shared thesame alignment as the NW-SE wall of the earlier excav<strong>at</strong>ions under the <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>. Roman floorsurfaces were also identified associ<strong>at</strong>ed with these walls. A deposit of painted plaster wasidentified face down as it had fallen from a wall or ceiling. <strong>The</strong>se Roman levels had been sealed bya post medieval deposit th<strong>at</strong> was cut by a number of refuse pits and postholes and the trench wassealed by a deep deposit of Victorian garden soil and the car-park surface.Trench one identified a large circular cut fe<strong>at</strong>ure with fire scorched edges and a decayed chalkdeposit <strong>at</strong> the base, this was interpreted as a post-medieval lime kiln thought to have gone out ofuse during the 18 th to 19 th centuries.42© Archaeology South-East


OASIS ID: archaeol6-108232Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Project detailsProject nameShort description ofthe project<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Pub, <strong>St</strong> Albans<strong>The</strong> site lies within the walls of Roman Verulamium and Romanstructures interpreted as a b<strong>at</strong>h-<strong>house</strong> had been previously identifiedon the site during the extension of the pub buildings in 1974-5. Twotrenches were excav<strong>at</strong>ed by Archaeology South-East in order tofurther assess the extent of these structures, and to demonstr<strong>at</strong>earchaeological procedures and local history to the wider <strong>public</strong>.Trench one encountered clay Brickearth deposits <strong>at</strong> a depth of81.97m. <strong>The</strong> limit of excav<strong>at</strong>ion in trench two was <strong>at</strong> 81.62m AODwhere a small post medieval pit exposed a layer of Roman gravelrich clay containing plaster fragments, n<strong>at</strong>ural deposits were notencountered in this trench. Trench two to the rear of the car-parkidentified two abutting Roman walls, one of which shared the samealignment as the NW-SE wall of the earlier excav<strong>at</strong>ions under the<strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>. Roman floor surfaces were also identified associ<strong>at</strong>edwith these walls. A deposit of painted plaster was identified facedown as it had fallen from a wall or ceiling. <strong>The</strong>se Roman levels hadbeen sealed by a post medieval deposit th<strong>at</strong> was cut by a number ofrefuse pits and postholes and the trench was sealed by a deepdeposit of Victorian garden soil and the car-park surface. Trench oneidentified a large circular cut fe<strong>at</strong>ure with fire scorched edges and adecayed chalk deposit <strong>at</strong> the base, this was interpreted as a postmedievallime kiln thought to have gone out of use during the 18th to19th centuries.Project d<strong>at</strong>es <strong>St</strong>art: 11-08-2011 End: 15-08-2011Previous/futurework<strong>An</strong>y associ<strong>at</strong>edproject referencecodesType of projectSite st<strong>at</strong>usSite st<strong>at</strong>us (other)Current Land useMonument typeMonument typeSignificant FindsSignificant FindsSignificant FindsSignificant FindsSignificant FindsYes / NoSXB 11 - SitecodeField evalu<strong>at</strong>ionNoneJust outside the Verulamium Sheduled Monument AreaOther 15 - OtherBUILDING RomanLIME KILN Post MedievalPOTTERY RomanCBM RomanPAINTED PLASTER RomanCOINS RomanSEAL BOX Roman43© Archaeology South-East


Significant FindsMethods &techniquesDevelopment typeDevelopment typePromptPromptPosition in theplanning processCLAY PIPE Post Medieval'Augering','Targeted Trenches'Car park (fl<strong>at</strong>)Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Excav<strong>at</strong>ion in a car-park not due to development pressuresVoluntary/self-interestFor a television programmeNot known / Not recordedProject loc<strong>at</strong>ionCountrySite loc<strong>at</strong>ionPostcode<strong>St</strong>udy areaEnglandHERTFORDSHIRE ST ALBANS ST ALBANS <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> PubAL3 4SH590.00 Square metresSite coordin<strong>at</strong>es TL 13677 07398 51.7532609150 -0.352948015112 51 45 11 N 00021 10 W PointL<strong>at</strong>/Long D<strong>at</strong>umPosition derived from chartsHeight OD / Depth Min: 81.62m Max: 81.97mProject cre<strong>at</strong>orsName ofOrganis<strong>at</strong>ionArchaeology South-EastProject brieforigin<strong>at</strong>orArchaeology South-EastProject designorigin<strong>at</strong>orArchaeology South-EastProjectdirector/managerJon SygraveProject supervisorDylan HopkinsonType ofsponsor/fundingbodypriv<strong>at</strong>e clientName ofsponsor/fundingbodyOxford Scientific FilmsProject archivesPhysical ArchiveLocal Museum44© Archaeology South-East


ecipientPhysical ContentsPhysical ArchivenotesDigital ArchiverecipientDigital ContentsDigital MediaavailablePaper ArchiverecipientPaper ContentsPaper MediaavailableArchaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190'<strong>An</strong>imal Bones','Ceramics','Glass','Metal','other'Painted Plaster Metal Small FInds including coins and seal box baseLocal Museum'<strong>St</strong>r<strong>at</strong>igraphic','Survey''Images raster / digital photography','Survey','Text'Local Museum'<strong>St</strong>r<strong>at</strong>igraphic','Survey''Context sheet','Drawing','M<strong>at</strong>rices','Plan','Report','Section'Projectbibliography 1Public<strong>at</strong>ion typeTitleGrey liter<strong>at</strong>ure (unpublished document/manuscript)<strong>An</strong> <strong>Archaeological</strong> <strong>Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>,Michaels <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> Albans, HertfordshireAuthor(s)/Editor(s) Hopkinson, D.Other bibliographicdetailsReport Number: 2010193D<strong>at</strong>e 2011Issuer or publisherPlace of issue or<strong>public</strong><strong>at</strong>ionDescriptionArchaeology South-EastPortslade, Brighton40 page A4 bound report with colour illustr<strong>at</strong>ions and photosEntered by Dylan Hopkinson (dylan.hopkinson@ucl.ac.uk)Entered on 22 August 201145© Archaeology South-East


Archaeology South-East<strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House, <strong>St</strong> Michael’s <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> AlbansASE Report No: 2011190Project archivesPhysical ArchiverecipientPhysical ContentsPhysical ArchivenotesDigital ArchiverecipientDigital ContentsDigital MediaavailablePaper ArchiverecipientPaper ContentsPaper MediaavailableLocal Museum'<strong>An</strong>imal Bones','Ceramics','Glass','Metal','other'Painted Plaster Metal Small FInds including coins and seal box baseLocal Museum'<strong>St</strong>r<strong>at</strong>igraphic','Survey''Images raster / digital photography','Survey','Text'Local Museum'<strong>St</strong>r<strong>at</strong>igraphic','Survey''Context sheet','Drawing','M<strong>at</strong>rices','Plan','Report','Section'Projectbibliography 1Public<strong>at</strong>ion typeTitleGrey liter<strong>at</strong>ure (unpublished document/manuscript)<strong>An</strong> <strong>Archaeological</strong> <strong>Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>,Michaels <strong>St</strong>reet, <strong>St</strong> Albans, HertfordshireAuthor(s)/Editor(s) Hopkinson, D.Other bibliographicdetailsReport Number: 2010193D<strong>at</strong>e 2011Issuer or publisherPlace of issue or<strong>public</strong><strong>at</strong>ionDescriptionArchaeology South-EastPortslade, Brighton40 page A4 bound report with colour illustr<strong>at</strong>ions and photosEntered by Dylan Hopkinson (dylan.hopkinson@ucl.ac.uk)Entered on 22 August 201144© Archaeology South-East


211000N210000209000208000<strong>The</strong> Site2070002060000 1kmReproduced from the Ordnance Survey's 1:25000 map of 1997with permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's <strong>St</strong><strong>at</strong>ionary Office.Crown Copyright. Licence No. AL 503 10 A513000514000515000 aaa000516000© Archaeology South-EastProject Ref: 5024 Aug 2011Report Ref: 2011190 Drawn by: DJH<strong>St</strong> Albans, <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public HouseSite loc<strong>at</strong>ionFig. 1


1N207410Trench 214PH20740018b23207390Trench 1<strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House<strong>St</strong> Michael's <strong>St</strong>reet29310 5m<strong>St</strong> Germain's Cottage513660Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO.Ordnance Survey Licence no. AL 503 10 A513670513680513690513700513710513720 Archaeology South-EastProject Ref: 5024 Aug 2011Report Ref: 2011190 Drawn by: DJH<strong>St</strong> Albans, <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public HouseSite PlanFig. 2


N82.78mODSW04200100482.62mODNE043031046006005034006005047005047Section 182.73mODAugerloc<strong>at</strong>ion031042031 040006041045Section 2NE004 004033005034005047046004047 043 04504482.40mODSW006005Section 3039006038Maximum depth reached by auger82.99mOD0 1m82.56mOD001004SE004043041002003040042005NW006Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO.Ordnance Survey Licence no. AL 503 10 A0060 0.5mTrench 1, looking south-eastTrench 1, looking north-west Archaeology South-EastProject Ref: 5024 Aug 2011Report Ref: 2011190 Drawn by: DJH<strong>St</strong> Albans, <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public HouseTrench 1Fig. 3


N82.92mODSection 4Section 582.99mODNE007SWSE007NW029Section 6011017010015Unexcav<strong>at</strong>ed014Section 7011013Section 8008025008026025026009 009026026Section 6Section 782.98mOD82.89mODSection 11020012SW007NENW007SE035037036Section 10010011018011Section 9008009014014008009022 026016036009028027025Section 4017015015026049Section 582.88mODSection 8 Section 982.88mOD007 007NW SE SWNE008 008009 009CBMMortarFlint0 1m01201201301382.19mODSection 10 Section 11Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO.Ordnance Survey Licence no. AL 503 10 A82.07mODSWNE022 SW020NE0 0.5mTrench 2, looking south-west, 010 in foreground and 011 inbackgroundTrench 2, looking north-east Archaeology South-EastProject Ref: 5024 Aug 2011Report Ref: 2011190 Drawn by: DJH<strong>St</strong> Albans, <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public HouseTrench 2Fig. 4


Painted plaster fragments from context [010]Painted plaster fragments from context [012]© Archaeology South-EastProject Ref: 5024 August 2011Report Ref: 2010193 Drawn by:DJH<strong>St</strong> Albans, <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public HousePainted PlasterFig. 5


Painted plaster fragments from context [005]Painted plaster fragments from context [005]© Archaeology South-EastProject Ref: 5024 August 2011Report Ref: 2010193 Drawn by:DJH<strong>St</strong> Albans, <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public HousePainted PlasterFig. 6


Pot 1Pot 20 5cm© Archaeology South-EastProject Ref: 5024 Aug 2011Report Ref: 2010193 Drawn by:FEG<strong>St</strong> Alban’s, <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> <strong>public</strong> <strong>house</strong>Selected potteryFig. 7


1N207410Trench 2207400Extension of wall[018] from trench 2PH14Flint 'Wall C' from1970's excav<strong>at</strong>ionsTile built 'Wall D' from1970's excav<strong>at</strong>ions18b207390Flint 'Wall A' from1970's excav<strong>at</strong>ionsTrench 1<strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public House<strong>St</strong> Michael's <strong>St</strong>reet2923ClayCBMMortarFlintClay wall from1970's excav<strong>at</strong>ions310 5m<strong>St</strong> Germain's Cottage513660Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO.Ordnance Survey Licence no. AL 503 10 A513670513680513690513700513710513720 Archaeology South-EastProject Ref: 5024 Aug 2011Report Ref: 2011190 Drawn by: DJH<strong>St</strong> Albans, <strong>Six</strong> <strong>Bells</strong> Public HouseSite plan showing fe<strong>at</strong>ures identified in 1970's excav<strong>at</strong>ionsFig. 8


Head OfficeUnits 1 & 22 Chapel PlacePortsladeEast Sussex BN41 1DRTel: +44(0)1273 426830 Fax:+44(0)1273 420866email: fau@ucl.ac.ukWeb: www.archaeologyse.co.ukLondon OfficeCentre for Applied ArchaeologyInstitute of ArchaeologyUniversity College London31-34 Gordon Square, London, WC1 0PYTel: +44(0)20 7679 4778Fax:+44(0)20 7383 2572Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/caa<strong>The</strong> contracts division of the Centre for Applied Archaeology, University College Londonc Archaeology South-East

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!