substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time <strong>for</strong> comparable transactions with nonemployees.From time <strong>to</strong> time, certain of <strong>our</strong> direc<strong>to</strong>rs, executive officers and other employees who <strong>are</strong>accredited inves<strong>to</strong>rs may invest their personal funds directly in funds managed by <strong>Piper</strong> <strong>Jaffray</strong>,through <strong>our</strong> subsidiaries, on the same terms and with the same conditions as the other inves<strong>to</strong>rs inthese funds, who may not be <strong>our</strong> direc<strong>to</strong>rs, executive officers or employees. Messrs. Schnettler and<strong>Piper</strong> invested $100,000 and $80,000, respectively, in one such fund in 2005.To the extent permitted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, <strong>our</strong> direc<strong>to</strong>rs and executive officersand their affiliates from time <strong>to</strong> time may be or may have been indebted <strong>to</strong> <strong>our</strong> broker-dealersubsidiary in connection with margin account loans. Such indebtedness is in the ordinary c<strong>our</strong>se ofb<strong>us</strong>iness, is on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailingat the time <strong>for</strong> comparable transactions with other persons and does not involve more than a normalrisk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT AND PAYMENT OF FEES TO OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORAudit Committee ReportThe primary function of <strong>our</strong> Audit Committee is oversight of <strong>our</strong> financial reporting process,publicly filed financial reports, internal accounting and financial controls, and the independent audit ofthe consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements of <strong>Piper</strong> <strong>Jaffray</strong> Companies<strong>for</strong> the year ended December 31, 2005, were audited by Ernst & <strong>You</strong>ng LLP, independent audi<strong>to</strong>r <strong>for</strong>the company.As part of its activities, the Committee has:1. Reviewed and disc<strong>us</strong>sed with management and the independent audi<strong>to</strong>r the company’saudited financial statements;2. Disc<strong>us</strong>sed with the independent audi<strong>to</strong>r the matters required <strong>to</strong> be communicated underStatement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees);3. Received the written disclosures and letter from the independent audi<strong>to</strong>r required byIndependence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Disc<strong>us</strong>sions with AuditCommittees); and4. Disc<strong>us</strong>sed with the independent audi<strong>to</strong>r its independence.Management is responsible <strong>for</strong> the company’s system of internal controls and the financialreporting process. Ernst & <strong>You</strong>ng LLP is responsible <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>ming an independent audit of theconsolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board and issuing a report thereon. Our Committee’s responsibility is <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r andoversee these processes.Based on the <strong>for</strong>egoing review and disc<strong>us</strong>sions and a review of the report of Ernst & <strong>You</strong>ng LLPwith respect <strong>to</strong> the consolidated financial statements, and relying thereon, we have recommended <strong>to</strong>the Board of Direc<strong>to</strong>rs of <strong>Piper</strong> <strong>Jaffray</strong> Companies the incl<strong>us</strong>ion of the audited consolidated financialstatements in <strong>Piper</strong> <strong>Jaffray</strong>’s Annual Report on Form 10-K <strong>for</strong> the year ended December 31, 2005, <strong>for</strong>filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Audit Committee of the Board of Direc<strong>to</strong>rs of <strong>Piper</strong> <strong>Jaffray</strong> CompaniesRichard A. Zona, ChairpersonB. Kristine JohnsonFrank L. Sims34
Audi<strong>to</strong>r FeesErnst & <strong>You</strong>ng LLP served as <strong>our</strong> independent audi<strong>to</strong>r <strong>for</strong> 2005 and 2004. The following tablepresents fees <strong>for</strong> professional audit services <strong>for</strong> the audit of <strong>our</strong> <strong>annual</strong> consolidated financialstatements <strong>for</strong> 2005 and 2004 as well as fees <strong>for</strong> the review of <strong>our</strong> interim consolidated financialstatements <strong>for</strong> each quarter in 2005 and 2004 and <strong>for</strong> all other services per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> 2005 and 2004by Ernst & <strong>You</strong>ng LLP.2005 2004Audit Fees **************************************************** $782,200 $ 753,215Audit-Related Fees (1) ******************************************** 118,800 51,100Tax Fees (2) **************************************************** 0 386,000All Other Fees ************************************************* 0 0Total ********************************************************* $901,000 $1,190,315(1)(2)Audit-related services <strong>are</strong> assurance and related services that <strong>are</strong> reasonably related <strong>to</strong> the per<strong>for</strong>manceof the audit or review of <strong>our</strong> financial statements. Specifically, the services provided <strong>for</strong> 2005 and 2004primarily included services relating <strong>to</strong> IRA Keogh agreed-upon procedures and employee benefit planaudits. Audit-related services <strong>for</strong> 2005 also included the issuance of an independent audi<strong>to</strong>r’s report oncontrols placed in operation and tests of operating effectiveness.Tax fees consist of tax compliance fees and tax consultation fees. Tax compliance fees <strong>to</strong>taled $288,000in 2004 and consisted of services relating <strong>to</strong> federal, state and local estimated tax calculations, federaland state partnership tax returns, and <strong>for</strong>eign tax services per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> <strong>Piper</strong> <strong>Jaffray</strong> Ltd. Taxconsultation services in 2004 <strong>to</strong>taled $98,000 and consisted of state value analysis, acquisition duediligence and transfer pricing consultation. For 2005, we hired KPMG LLP <strong>to</strong> provide <strong>us</strong> tax services,including tax compliance services and tax consultation services. As a result, we did not incur fees <strong>for</strong>tax services from Ernst & <strong>You</strong>ng LLP <strong>for</strong> 2005.Audi<strong>to</strong>r Services Pre-Approval PolicyThe Audit Committee has adopted an audi<strong>to</strong>r services pre-approval policy applicable <strong>to</strong> servicesper<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> <strong>us</strong> by <strong>our</strong> independent audi<strong>to</strong>r. In accordance with this policy, the Audit Committee’spractice is <strong>to</strong> approve <strong>annual</strong>ly all audit, audit-related and permissible non-audit services <strong>to</strong> beprovided by the independent audi<strong>to</strong>r during the year. If a service <strong>to</strong> be provided is not pre-approved aspart of the <strong>annual</strong> process or if it may exceed pre-approved fees levels, the service m<strong>us</strong>t receive aspecific and separate pre-approval by the Audit Committee, which has delegated authority <strong>to</strong> grantsuch pre-approvals during the year <strong>to</strong> the chairperson of the Audit Committee. Any pre-approvalsgranted pursuant <strong>to</strong> this delegated authority <strong>are</strong> reported <strong>to</strong> the Audit Committee at its next regularmeeting.Our Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the non-audit services described in thetable above was compatible with maintaining the independence of <strong>our</strong> independent audi<strong>to</strong>r. The AuditCommittee reviews each non-audit service <strong>to</strong> be provided and assesses the impact of the service on theaudi<strong>to</strong>r’s independence. On February 21, <strong>2006</strong>, the Audit Committee pre-approved certain services <strong>to</strong>be provided by <strong>our</strong> independent audi<strong>to</strong>r relating <strong>to</strong> engagements occurring on or after February 21,<strong>2006</strong>.ITEM 3 — RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORThe Audit Committee of <strong>our</strong> Board of Direc<strong>to</strong>rs has selected Ernst & <strong>You</strong>ng LLP <strong>to</strong> serve as <strong>our</strong>independent audi<strong>to</strong>r <strong>for</strong> the year ending December 31, <strong>2006</strong>. While it is not required <strong>to</strong> do so, <strong>our</strong>Board of Direc<strong>to</strong>rs is submitting the selection of Ernst & <strong>You</strong>ng LLP <strong>for</strong> ratification in order <strong>to</strong>ascertain the views of <strong>our</strong> sh<strong>are</strong>holders with respect <strong>to</strong> the choice of audit firm. If the selection is not35