22M. A. AzabFig. (4) Drainage net of the area <strong>betwee</strong>n Wadi Samadi and Wadi Sherm LuliFig. (5) Drainage networks of the area <strong>betwee</strong>n Wadi Um Ab<strong>ba</strong>s and Wadi Qulan
FLOOD HAZARD BETWEE MARSA ALAM - RAS BAAS 23Fig. (6) Drainage networks of the area <strong>betwee</strong>n Wadi Radi and R<strong>as</strong> Ban<strong>as</strong>.Drainage B<strong>as</strong>in MorphometryQuantitative analysis of hydrographic <strong>ba</strong>sin can be achieved through me<strong>as</strong>uring thegeomorphological parameters including stream order (U), bifurcation ratio (Rb), streamfrequency (F) and drainage density (D).Stream Orders (U) of the studied <strong>ba</strong>sins range <strong>betwee</strong>n 7 (Wadi EI Gemal and Wadi Ghadir)and 4 (Wadi Samadi, Wadi Nakari Wadi Khalilate El Bahri, Wadi Khalilate EI Qibli, WadiUm Dahise, Wadi Urn Ghazal, Wadi Stayai, Wadi Kirah EI Hertawi and Wadi Um Rimarim).(Table 1).Bifurcation Ratio (Rb) defined <strong>as</strong> the ratio <strong>betwee</strong>n the number of stream order (Nu) to thenumber of the next order (Nu+1)(Horton 1945). B<strong>as</strong>ins with low Rb values tend to produce <strong>as</strong>harp peak flow while the high Rb reflects low extended peak flow. The estimated Rb valuesof the studied <strong>ba</strong>sins (Table 1) ranges <strong>betwee</strong>n 2.82 and 4.85. Low values were recorded forWadi Satayia, Wadi Khalilate El Bahri, Wadi KhaIilate El QibIi, Wadi Sharm Luli, WadiGhadir and Wadi Um Ab<strong>ba</strong>s, and high values were recorded for Wadi Samadi, Wadi Nakari,Wadi Ranga, Wadi Radi, Wadi Um Rimarim, Wadi Kirah EI Hertawi, Wadi Lahmi and WadiQulan. The variation in Rb values reflects the difference in stages of geomorphic developmentand topographic variations. B<strong>as</strong>ins of high bifurcation ratio are elongate in shape and permitthe p<strong>as</strong>sage of runoff over an extended period of time to feed the groundwater. B<strong>as</strong>ins of lowbifurcation ratio are circular in shape and allow the runoff to p<strong>as</strong>s in a short time (Saad et al.1980).Drainage Density (D) reflects the effectiveness of the surface water flow,<strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong>, theinfiltration capacity. It is a function of slope, rock resistance, rock' permeability, andvegetation cover. In the study area, the drainage density (1.4-5.02) is a direct expression ofrelief <strong>as</strong> the vegetation is not represented and the rocks are more or less impermeable andresistant. Drainage density is low in Wadi Samadi, Wadi Um Ab<strong>ba</strong>s, Wadi Abu Ghusun,Wadi Ranga, Wadi Kh<strong>as</strong>hir, Wadi Lahmi and Wadi Sataiya, and high in Wadi Khalilate El