Jackie with Megan, aged two monthsFamily’s life ruined bynightmare birth“I watched it happen.That’s what they did tomy wife and daughter”week scan, she was still saying it was a 6lb baby.”Mike: “The midwife told us we <strong>co</strong>uld have another scan justbefore the due date, but that it was bad for the baby to get scanafter scan and repeated that it was just fluid. We were first timeparents. She was very <strong>co</strong>nfident so we thought it was all good. Wedidn’t look at the paper work until later – with six weeks to gobefore she was due, the child was then about 6lb. It doesn’t take arocket scientist to tell that the child was going to gain weight overthe final weeks and would not be 6lb at birth.”On March 26 2005, Jackie went into labour at 3 o’clock in themorning. The midwife arrived just before 8am and the <strong>co</strong>uple wentto Pukekohe Maternity Unit, where a water birth was planned.Jackie was assessed and told to “get pushing”. The midwife decidedto “speed things up” by breaking Jackie’s waters. The result was atiny trickle – there was hardly any fluid. Jackie was right - it wasall baby. The midwife ignored the warning sign and told Jackieto push. She said Jackie was fully dilated. “She got a <strong>co</strong>lleague tocheck how my baby was positioned.” At 1pm, an ambulance tookJackie to Middlemore. In the ambulance the midwife told the<strong>co</strong>uple: “physically the baby will not fit – it looks like it’s going tobe a caesarian.” At Middlemore Hospital, the examining doctortold Jackie she was not fully dilated.Mike: “At the hospital the doctor spoke about an epidural.Jackie was in a lot of pain. The doctor looked at her briefly, thenwas called away. This happened ½ a dozen times. He would startto examine her and be interrupted by his pager. At one stage hewas holding his pager while he was examining her. I believe henever had a decent time to properly examine Jackie. He <strong>co</strong>uldn’t<strong>co</strong>ncentrate and overlooked the severity of the situation. Thehospital later sent us an ‘advocate’ email to apologise for this actionand the lack of <strong>co</strong>mmunication by the doctor, but he subsequentlydenied the incident with the pager had ever happened, to theHealth and Disability enquiry. I was there. I witnessed all of it. ”At 6pm, Jackie was told about what to expect for a caesarian andwas prepped. An hour later the plan was abandoned without tellingthe Feltons what was going on. Jackie was told to <strong>co</strong>ntinue pushing.“The midwife told me that if I didn’t push, I might get a caesarian,and I would regret it.”Mike was by this stage be<strong>co</strong>ming extremely agitated. “I thought,how urgent is our case? Now we are on the backburner. A seniormidwife examined Jackie and mentioned an “asian pelvis” and thatJackie was extremely dry. We later found there had been a study ofmixed race births out for two years, because of the difficulties withthe size of asian pelvises. They should have known about that at thehospital. The senior midwife did.”“The doctor came back at 9pm and said “let’s have a baby.”He unpacked the vontuce equipment, with suction cap, to pullthe child out. The head appeared, but soon the doctor was very“We were expecting our first child and were delightedwhen the scan showed it was a little girl. But at the laterstages of pregnancy, we were both uneasy. Jackie washuge. People asked if we were having twins. We wentback to the midwife several times and asked her aboutthe size of the baby. She kept assuring us it was a 6lbbaby, with a lot of fluid.”Mike and Jackie Felton of Pukekohe <strong>co</strong>ntinued to be<strong>co</strong>ncerned. Jackie, who is Chinese, <strong>co</strong>uld feel the babywas big. “I was packed. The baby filled me. I asked if Iwas eating too much, I was so <strong>co</strong>ncerned. We asked themidwife more than 10 times about its size, but at the 3214Megan in Intensive Care at Middlemore
nervous, he was sweating. I noticed that there was nothingregistering on the monitoring screen. The child was jammed.People pressed down on Jackie’s stomach. They had her push atall bizarre angles. Others pulled at the child. Hospital re<strong>co</strong>rds sayit took five minutes to get the child fully out. It was a total messup.Our midwife was dry retching in the <strong>co</strong>rner. ICU peoplewere hovering just outside the door and worked for 20 minutes toresuscitate Megan.’Megan’s birth weight was 10lb. She was whisked to ICU, withMike by her side. “At ICU the care was <strong>co</strong>mpletely different. Onedoctor broke off his holidays to <strong>co</strong>me in and keep Megan alive. Ifonly the care had been that good for the delivery.”The day after Megan’s birth, the delivering doctor and a seniordoctor came to Jackie’s room to try to smooth over the trauma.They told her that it had been a “textbook delivery” and to “getover it.” Jackie was in a room where other mothers had theirbabies and Mike asked if she <strong>co</strong>uld be moved to a room on herown. She was taken to a room that was infested with fleas, withceiling tiles missing; a room they found out later was in line forfumigation. Meanwhile, Megan remained in intensive care for amonth, with tubes to keep her alive. When she came home, thenightmare was not over. A tube stayed in Megan’s nose to feedher intravenously. She was a very sick little girl. The Feltons’ longbattle had just begun.Mike and Jackie had been assured at several meetingswith hospital management that they would be given everyassistance to obtain help for Megan through ACC. But it wasjust the opposite. It took a year for the Health and Disability<strong>co</strong>mmissioner to release his findings. He found that “the midwifedid a satisfactory job and there was no breach.” The doctor wasfound to be in breach of Right 4(1) of the Code, “in failing toexercise reasonable care and skill in this aspect of his obstetricmanagement.” He was found to have failed to read the CTGmonitor <strong>co</strong>rrectly, that he should have done other tests forthe wellbeing of the child but didn’t and that he should have<strong>co</strong>nsulted with a superior about the length and difficulty of thelabour. He was asked to apologise to the Feltons. Instead, he leftthe <strong>co</strong>untry during the investigation. An apology followed later,through his lawyer in Australia.One doctor advised ACC that “the child’s wellbeing was upand down all the way. At the hospital Jackie was given drugs thatwere not appropriate for the situation, with the non reassuringCTG. ..there was significant delay in the delivery of babyMegan, especially during the late first stage and se<strong>co</strong>nd stageof labour.” They heard also that ante natal scans on November3 and February 8 both showed above average in foetal growth.Astonishingly, the <strong>co</strong>mmissioner’s verdict was that Megan’s braininjuries were due to “unforeseen circumstances, not an accident.”ACC followed that finding by denying the Feltons help forMegan, stating that Megan was brain damaged because hershoulders got stuck during delivery. “I know it’s not right,” saysMike. “There were too many indicators before the delivery thatMegan was too big to be born without a caesarian.”An independent world leader in the field of brain damage inutero, paediatric scientist Professor Peter Gluckman, reviewedthe case for the Feltons. He <strong>co</strong>ncluded that Megan’s injuries werecaused by ”medical mishap.” He questioned why the ethnicityof the mother and the size of the baby were not picked up. Hesaid there was “early <strong>co</strong>mpromise of the foetal brain…that CTGevedence suggested foetal tachycardia and loss of heart ratevariability from the initial re<strong>co</strong>rding”. “Properly given treatmentwould not be expected to result in birth injuries as serious asthose suffered by Megan.” (see footnote 1)HDC <strong>co</strong>untered thisJoinThe Questpage 16Advertising sales 09 239 1699, sales@elocal.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>nz</strong>To Help Support Those In Need<strong>Elocal</strong> Will Donate $25 To A CharityOf Your Choice With Every BookPurchased $49.95LIMITED EDITION“We at elocal <strong>co</strong>nsider this June ‘FranklinHeroes’ edition a vital publication to our uniqueFranklin area. elocal are proud to be part of astrong, healthy <strong>co</strong>mmunity who really do rollup the sleeves and ‘muck-in’. As part of our<strong>co</strong>ntinuing support for our <strong>co</strong>mmunity, elocalwill donate $25 (50%) of the purchase price ofeach spectacular case-bound Franklin Yearbookpurchased during the month of June to a charityof your choice from the list below. Wesupport our local heroes, join elocal to helpsupport those in need”Mykeljon WinckelEditor elocal.Franklin HospiceSalvation ArmyOrder of St JohnTough LoveMegan Felton’s familyPlunketWestpac Rescur Heli<strong>co</strong>ptersOther Choice?elocal InBuy A BookAnd HelpPOSTAGEAdd $7per bookTo Order and Donate CALLeLocal 09.239.1699 ext 3www.elocal.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>nz</strong>15