Let's get it right: race and justice 2000 - Nacro

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The NACRO Race and Criminal Justice Unit was createdin 1993 to work with inter-agency groups at local level. Itis Home Office funded. Four local inter-agency groupswere established, to mirror the national committee andwhose members would have the authority to implementthe national policy recommendations in their areas andorganisations.The Inner London RIAC was chaired by Sylvia Denman,OBE, a lawyer and a former member of the CriminalJustice Consultative Council. In 1996 this committeeexpanded to cover Greater London. It continues to meet,now chaired by John Walters, Chief Probation Officer inMiddlesex. It is about to publish an action plan for workover the coming year, taking into account recent majordevelopments such as the Stephen Lawrence InquiryReport.The Leeds committee was also formed in 1993. Itpublished an interim report in 1995 and then expanded tobecome the West Yorkshire Race Advisory Group. It ischaired by the Chief Probation Officer for West Yorkshire,Anne Mace. The Surrey committee continued until 1998,chaired by David Allonby OBE, of the Central ProbationCouncil. The fourth local committee, in Leicester, met forthree years, chaired by the Rt Rev Tom Butler, (then)Bishop of Leicester. It also produced a report, and linksmade with the Race and Criminal Justice Unit aremaintained.In 1996, the Unit was given a new remit: to work moredirectly with the 23 Area Criminal Justice LiaisonCommittees (ACJLCs) to help them to take forward the50 recommendations in the 1993 Criminal JusticeConsultative Council report on race and criminal justice –described in more detail in the next chapter.The Unit is working with the Area Committees inMerseyside, Greater Manchester, SouthYorkshire/Humberside, West Midlands, South and SouthWest Wales, Avon and Somerset, Devon and Cornwall,Kent and East and West Sussex, Thames Valley, andHertfordshire and Bedfordshire. In addition, the NACROcommittees in London and West Yorkshire act in anadvisory capacity to their respective Area Committees.training, ethnic monitoring, and community links. Basedon this and on discussions in the area, an action plan –with a time limit for achieving it – is drawn up. Someactivities involve inter-agency work, and some aretargetted at particular agencies. In some areas smaller subgroupshave been formed to implement the action plansand report back to the full committee. Where possible, theUnit helps local agencies with particular aspects of thework and offers general advice and consultation on policyimplementation.This work at Area Committee level has helped the Unit tobuild up a good picture of what is being done in terms ofrace policy in major cities with large minoritycommunities and also, importantly, in rural areas withsmall and often isolated minority populations which areoften at particular risk of racial harassment.The Race and Criminal Justice Unit has delivered tailormadetraining to magistrates, magistrates’ courts’ staff andCrown Court staff; to the Crown Prosecution Service inLondon (which was then adopted nationally by the CPS),for probation hostel staff, prison boards of visitors, and ina local prison for prison officers. It produced an EqualTreatment Training pack for lay magistrates,commissioned by the Judicial Studies Board EqualTreatment Advisory Committee. The Unit also conductedan evaluation of an experiment on stop and search inTottenham, commissioned by the Haringey Communityand Police Consultative Committee.This range of work at national and local level forms abasis for much of the analysis in this report. Observationsabout progress and new areas to be tackled are stronglyrooted in this practical work with criminal justiceagencies around the country. Examples of good practicefrom local Area Committee work are also included.Because this work is intended to be tailor-made to fitlocal circumstances, it has taken a different shape in eachregion. As a general rule, the first step is to conduct anaudit of current work on race issues. This includesemployment practices, services to local communities,10
CHAPTER3Commitmentfrom the topOne of the most important developments of the decadewas the creation in 1993 of the Criminal JusticeConsultative Council (CJCC) and 23 Area CriminalJustice Liaison Committees. The establishment of a coordinatingstructure for the criminal justice system was amajor recommendation of the report by Lord JusticeWoolf into the Strangeways prison disturbance of 1991.One of the first topics that the new Council looked at wasrace and the criminal justice system. A sub-group on raceissues was established, chaired by Her Honour JudgeElizabeth Fisher. Based on a paper from Council memberSylvia Denman OBE, it produced a report with 50detailed recommendations covering the work of all theagencies in the criminal justice system; research andethnic monitoring; training; and the functioning of thecommittees themselves.This sent a clear signal from the top that equality in theadministration of justice really matters. It was reinforcedby Lord Justice Rose, chair of the CJCC, when he spokeat a NACRO conference in London in 1996, at a timewhen he was having some fairly public disagreementswith the Home Secretary (of that time) about othermatters:‘Contrary to the impression given by some reportsin the media, there are issues about which theHome Secretary and I agree. Prominent amongthem is race. Both of us are determined to do allwe can to remove from the criminal justice systemactual and perceived racial discrimination,wherever it may be found.’Area Committees - chaired by judges - have worked sincethen to put the 50 recommendations into effect. Manyrecommendations have been achieved and race equality isfirmly on the agenda at regional and chief officer level.Discussions are now under way about increasing thenumber of Area Committees to 42, to bring them into linewith police areas and the new CPS boundaries. This morelocalised perspective would allow the committees to playa stronger role in promoting community partnerships andencouraging consistency of standards of services.In the coming months, the CJCC will need to give a newlead and new impetus to Area Committees to continue todevelop their work on race issues. The Crime andDisorder Act 1998 provisions for local communitypartnerships, new racially aggravated offences, and new11
Page 1 and 2: Let’sget itrightRace and Justice
Page 3 and 4: ContentsForeword page 21 A decade o
Page 5 and 6: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000trade unions,
Page 7 and 8: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 1 A DE
Page 9 and 10: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER A DECA
Page 11: CHAPTER2NACRO’s workon race andcr
Page 15 and 16: CHAPTER4Research andethnicmonitorin
Page 17 and 18: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 4 RESE
Page 23 and 24: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 5 EMPL
Page 31 and 32: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 6 SUSP
Page 43 and 44: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 7 AFTE
Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER8Victimsof crimeAt the end o
Page 51 and 52: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 8 VICT
Page 57 and 58: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER9After
Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER10Summary ofaction pointsCRI
Page 63 and 64:
RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 10 SUM
Page 65 and 66:
BIBLIOGRAPHYBland et al (1999), ‘
Page 67 and 68:
NACRO Race Issues Advisory Committe
show all

Let's get it right: race and justice 2000 - Nacro

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?