Let's get it right: race and justice 2000 - Nacro

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Let’s get it right‘There was no evidence that black or Asianoffenders were more or less likely than whites toreceive a custodial sentence when other factorswere taken into account.’This research – that seems to contradict other findings –underlines the need for everyone – prosecutors, lawyers,sentencers, defendants and of course the public – to bebetter informed about race and sentencing. Monitoring ofsentencing decisions is a starting point to answering thesequestions and reassuring all concerned that the courtprocess is above reproach.Civil proceedingsIn two key areas, for the purpose of this report, there isincreasing overlap between the civil and the criminaljustice systems.The Human Rights Act 1998 – and particularly Article 14which prohibits discrimination – may lead to increasedlitigation from minority claimants and an increasednumber of litigants in person. The 1998 Crime andDisorder Act includes provisions which blur theboundaries between criminal and civil: for example, antisocialbehaviour orders, parenting orders, and local childcurfews, which may start as civil proceedings; butbreaches of the orders will lead those involved to thecriminal courts. It is clearly important that there is nodiscrimination at the civil stage.Those making decisions about anti-social behaviour, orappropriate parenting, will need to be aware of culturaldifferences and trained to avoid discrimination in usingtheir discretion. Monitoring the use of these new orderswill help to detect whether they are beginning to be useddisproportionately against any particular group.Immigration and asylumNew immigration and asylum procedures will come intoforce with the Immigration and Asylum Bill 1998.Immigration officers will continue to make initialdecisions about asylum; administrative detention forunlimited periods will continue (although bail hearingswill be heard by magistrates); many detainees will be heldin prisons although not charged with any offence (seechapter 7); and immigration officers will have extendedpowers of arrest and search.Immigration Appeal Tribunals will become courts ofrecord and will include only legally qualified members;previously there was an opportunity for lay involvementwhich helped to produce more diverse tribunal panels.In his evidence to the Special Standing Committee of theHouse of Commons on the Immigration and Asylum Bill,Anver Jeevanjee, a lay member of immigration and othertribunals, commented on this aspect of the Bill:‘I believe that the injection and activeparticipation of leading members of the blackcommunity at the Immigration Appeal Tribunalwent some way in providing confidence with thefairness of the review process over immigrationdecisions. Moreover these black members werealso able to bring in their greater knowledge of thecustoms, culture and local sensitivity to the entiredecision-making process … the decision to abolishlay membership will instantly wipe out allexperienced black participation from this reviewprocess. Future decisions will be taken by a verynarrow band of white middle-class male lawyers,focused on purely legalistic terms.‘It is my humble view that it would be an entirelyretrograde step for the next millennium,particularly in the light of the Lawrence inquiryand proposals to build bridges across the racialdivides in our society and efforts at allowing moreblack participation in the decision-making areas ofBritish life.’A high proportion of those affected are from African andAsian countries. There is a widespread perception inminority communities that the immigration systemdiscriminates against racial minorities. It is essential thatthe new procedures are implemented fairly, with ethnicmonitoring of their use, accountability and openness, andtraining for all those involved, from immigration staff atentry points, to magistrates and tribunal members andthose running detention centres.38
RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 6 SUSPECTS AND DEFENDANTSACTION POINTSPolice services mustImplement the Government’s ActionPlan in response to the StephenLawrence Inquiry Reportrecommendations.Take action on ‘Winning the Race’ and‘Winning the Race Revisited’.Work with partnerships to involve localminority communities in developingcrime reduction strategies.Use s95 information constructively tomeasure and improve local services.The legal professions to promote theirrace equality policies and practicesmore forcefully and play a greater rolein the work of Area Criminal JusticeLiaison Committees.Ethnic monitoring of sentencingdecisions must be introduced.Civil courts must be alert to thepotential discriminatory impact ofparenting or anti-social behaviourorders.Training and ethnic monitoring mustbe introduced to ensure the newimmigration and asylum proceduresdo not have a discriminatory impacton black and Asian asylum seekers.39
Page 1 and 2: Let’sget itrightRace and Justice
Page 3 and 4: ContentsForeword page 21 A decade o
Page 5 and 6: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000trade unions,
Page 7 and 8: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 1 A DE
Page 9 and 10: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER A DECA
Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER2NACRO’s workon race andcr
Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER3Commitmentfrom the topOne o
Page 15 and 16: CHAPTER4Research andethnicmonitorin
Page 17 and 18: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 4 RESE
Page 23 and 24: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 5 EMPL
Page 31 and 32: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 6 SUSP
Page 39: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 6 SUSP
Page 43 and 44: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 7 AFTE
Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER8Victimsof crimeAt the end o
Page 51 and 52: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 8 VICT
Page 57 and 58: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER9After
Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER10Summary ofaction pointsCRI
Page 63 and 64: RACE AND JUSTICE 2000CHAPTER 10 SUM
Page 65 and 66: BIBLIOGRAPHYBland et al (1999), ‘
Page 67 and 68: NACRO Race Issues Advisory Committe

Let's get it right: race and justice 2000 - Nacro

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?