NRA Journal - Summer 2004 - National Rifle Association

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LETTERSFrom Richard van LingenF ClassI today received my copy of the latest Journal. I wassad to read of the death of Charles Trotter. He lookedextremely frail at the Imperial Prizegiving. I wasthankful that I had an opportunity then to chat to himfor a while. I wonder how many members realisethat, within the last nine months we have lostprobably the two best all-round (fullbore/smallbore)shooters the world has ever known. My friendshipwith both Andrew and Charles goes back more thanforty years. I will miss them, but they will both beremembered for their achievements on the range andtheir lovely personalities.Sadly, on a different topic, it seems that someimportant shooters are quickly forgotten. I read withinterest, amusement and some anger, the letter fromGraham King on F Class, together with the reply fromPaul Monaghan. The name “Farquarson” was notmentioned by either!Graham wrote: “I am therefore horrified by theattempt of some Old School target shooters to hijackF Class by proposing a 7.62 RG Class. There is nosuch class in the World Championships.” He closesoff with the extremely arrogant statement: “If it’s‘scoped target rifle you’re after, stay away!”Hello there, Graham, it’s time for a short historylesson! The “F” in F Class is today generally acceptedas standing for “Free”. However, initially it stood for“Farquarson”. I quote from an article I wrote last yearfor “Range”, a South African glossy shootingmagazine:“F Class: This originated in Canada and the “F”originally stood for “Farquarson”. George Farquarsonhad the idea that elderly, or infirm, shooters could bekept in the game if permitted a rested target rifle andoptical sights. The concept also appealed to theaccuracy nuts, who look upon it as a form of pronebenchrest. Now, any calibre is permitted, up to 8mm.Farquarson’s desire was to keep the F Classcompetitors shooting alongside TR, on the sametargets, but this was not testing enough for the reallyserious shooters and a group in Australia developeda target with a half-minute bull’s-eye (compared withthe two-minute TR bull). This was also adopted by aclub in the UK and some American shooters. Themajority, however still wish to keep TR and F Classshooting together, so a compromise was adopted forthe 2002 World Championships, held on theConnaught Ranges in Ottawa. The innermost (V bull)1-moa (minute of angle) ring, used in TR only forcounting out tied scores, was used as the F Class bull.It was given the value of 6. To avoid confusion, scoringregister-keeping was done the TR way, with V bullsshown as a “V”. The stats computer then convertedall the V’s shot by F Class competitors to sixes.”So, in reality, Graham, if there was any “hijacking”, itwas the other way around!As a member of both the ICFRA Palma and WorldChampionships and TR Committees, I shall fight tomy dying day to keep the TR and F Class link alive.Fullbore, overall, is declining worldwide, mainlybecause all governments favour gun control and makeit as difficult as possible for us to conduct our sport.It is our duty to avoid splintering the sport. “Stayaway” comments really make me bristle! In myopinion there should be two sub-classes within FClass. One would be the anything goes versionfavoured by Graham, but with strict rules to ensure afair contest. The skill element would be a combinationof calibre choice, load development, shootingtechnique and wind-reading ability. Their programmewould embrace both their own matches on the halfminutebull, and shooting alongside TR in majorchampionships such as the Bisley Imperial Meeting.For the latter, the DCRA scoring proved sufficient tomake the matches a true test of skill. The alternativeof using the TR bull will lead to interminable tieshootson 10 V possibles, as the skill level advances.The second sub-class would be restricted to the TRcalibre and bullet-weight rule. This would allow TRshooters to move to F Class with their existing riflesand equipment. The only additions would be atelescopic sight and a suitable rest or bipod. TheCanadian experiment with a TRO Class (slingsupportedTR rifle with a ‘scope sight) failed becausemost of the shooters with failing eyesight were theelderly, who also had a holding problem. I live in acountry where handloads have been the norm forquite a number of years. Our ammunition rules havenow been adopted for the Palma and all other WorldChampionships. The proposed 7.62 RG Class relatesto the contract between the UK NRA and the BritishMOD. This still has a number of years to run. Afterthat, I am confident that the NRA will follow the restof the fullbore world, with shooters’ choice ofhandloads or factory 7.62 or .308 ammo, using anybullet up to a maximum nominal 155 grains.Incidentally, as a TR and ISSF small-bore and 300metres shooter of 55 years standing, I don’t think thatI could ever convert to F Class. Throughout my careerit has been drummed into me that taking a deadrestis cheating. I say this tongue-in-cheek, otherwise PaulMonaghan might refuse to buy me a beer on the NorthLondon verandah in July!60
From Enrico CelottiMembership MattersWe received and went through the interesting articlethat Nick Jeffs put in the recent NRA Journal aboutmembership issues and the NRA wishes for the future.Although we understand that they are Nick’s viewsonly, we share much of them mostly concerning thefuture and strategic perspectives of the NRA, its scopeand actions.The new photocards are more than welcome becausethe technology opens wider perspectives in terms ofautomatic access control, security, prepaid servicesstored into it, history and attendance etc.We fully agree on the strategic principle behind acomprehensive database of shooters of all fullboreinterests and disciplines. We think the databaseshould contain a field for e-mail addresses in order tobe able to easily distribute any NRA news via e-mailmuch cheaper, faster and up-to-date than a printedJournal. There is currently available and cheapsoftware which allows for bulk personalised e-mailbroadcasts (assuming that a majority of the membershave access nowadays to e-mail which should be easyto fathom through a quick statistic into our currentmembers database).A light newsletter more frequently issued will betterserve the members in informing about events, debatesand issues, leaving the role of the “happened” to theJournal. Advertising for sponsors via e-news willbecome a more frequent and cheaper vehicle,encouraging them to use the media, with the NRApossibly benefitting (recouping costs) from it.The NRA representing all fullbore shooting mattersand interests is a great and ambitious idea andproposal. We guess it will meet some internal andexternal resistance, and the implementation of it willrequire a great deal of material effort within the NRAif representation is to be effective, comprehensive andable to make a dent both in decisional circuits and inpublic relations for the benefit of the sport.Away from Bisley, in an ideal world I should verymuch welcome the idea of more formalised crossrangeusage with all NRA members being able to useany negotiated range on the days an affiliated club ishaving a shoot. Not all of these are matters formembership, but an NRA credit card that is acceptedeverywhere may help to bring more shooters in asfull members.Reducing costs too is a matter we feel in need ofconsideration. Let us assume that shooters withambition tend to stay in the rimfire disciplinesespecially as it is more actively sponsored as anOlympic discipline. To take people - especially theyoung ones - into fullbore, they have to find itfinancially viable. Kit and gear do not cost much morethan small-bore, and a big part of it can be recycled.There is nothing much we can do on ammo pricesbut something could be done with ranges fees. TheRange Office Target is a very good way forward butmarkers remain an issue which we feel is gettingworse.What about exploring electronic targets for some ofthe lines - say ten - on Century like those just installedon the 300 metres range? It will save the marker costs,availability and skills (I am afraid the last one we goton the ROT was not very good) and such lines canbecome permanent ROTs available on demand andat any time - understandably at a suitable charge butwith no or minimal cancellation fees which can alsomitigate weather concerns. (Editor’s note: see next pagefor further information regarding this suggestion.)An NRA Clubhouse would be a great idea for all thosemembers and small clubs who do not have a place tohide when the weather hits hard and it would act as afocal and meeting point for many.Regarding the 200 Metres Associate Membership,whilst we greatly appreciate Nick moving to metricand leaving the unfathomable yards behind, we feelit is a bit contradictory with the previous statements.If the NRA want to become representative of allfullbore ways and disciplines and get out of the formaltarget rifle concept, one full membership categoryshould cover everyone’s taste without distinction.From Jim HallamThe Spring Journal included reference to several itemsof particular concern to me. I do hope that mycomments might be of interest. They are not to betaken as being critical, but are submitted in order tobe constructive.Membership MattersI am concerned that it seems that the MembershipDepartment is intending to produce a database. Iunderstand the intention but believe that what wereally need is for the major target shootingorganisations to come together into one organisationwith the various disciplines running their ownactivities under this umbrella. Thus the NRA woulddeal with FB TR (and some other aspects), the NSRAwith SB TR, the MLAGB and HBSA with theirspecialist areas etc. Under a British Target ShootingFederation(?) banner providing commonadministrative functions such as membership wewould have a more cost-effective structure withoutthe various organisations losing their autonomy – oneof the sacred cows of the shooting sports whichensures that we are politically weak.I believe that all who shoot at artificial targets withlicenceable firearms should be required to beregistered with that body which would provide thesingle Secretariat and bona fides for the licenceprocess. This is not a new idea – it works in othercountries, so why not here? After all it is only really61
Page 1:
National Rifle AssociationJournalSu
Page 5 and 6:
Appointment of Team CaptainPaul Whe
Page 7 and 8:
inefficient use of the targets. As
Page 10 and 11:
NOTES FROM THE MANAGINGDIRECTOR OF
Page 12 and 13: FORTHCOMING TOURSGreat Britain Rifl
Page 14 and 15: SHOOTING DISCIPLINE MATTERSF Classb
Page 16 and 17: Classic Armsby Rae WillsThis is the
Page 18 and 19: REGIONAL MATTERSEastern Regionby Gu
Page 20 and 21: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 22: Under Home Office regulations the N
Page 25 and 26: QUANTIFYING PERFORMANCEby Finbarr O
Page 27 and 28: We can see that, compared to the ot
Page 29 and 30: The SDR and Sum Index plots above b
Page 31 and 32: ANDREW PENFOLD - CHIEF NATIONAL COA
Page 33 and 34: Tuesday was another landmark - when
Page 35 and 36: A further prime aim of ICFRA is tha
Page 37 and 38: We do not know how much notice was
Page 39 and 40: suggested an electro copy of the El
Page 41 and 42: soil, which in the sun offers an al
Page 43 and 44: Dick Winney and Dave Taylor coach a
Page 45 and 46: GREAT BRITAIN UNDER 25 RIFLE TEAM T
Page 47 and 48: Having collected the rifles off the
Page 49 and 50: GREAT BRITAIN UNDER 19 RIFLE TEAM T
Page 51 and 52: New 155 grain PALMA Ammunition as l
Page 53 and 54: oquefort, tomme de savoie and a che
Page 55 and 56: SPRING GENERAL MEETING - 27 MARCH 2
Page 57 and 58: opportunity to thank on your behalf
Page 59 and 60: OBITUARIESMichael ThrelfallHeathcot
Page 61: Leslie John DyerLeslie John Dyer (o
Page 65 and 66: NRA TRADE MEMBERSRobert George & Co
show all

NRA Journal - Summer 2004 - National Rifle Association

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?