(continued from p. 33)system <strong>of</strong> education. This is true for all children,with or without disabilities: Few are involvedin making decisions about their education andlives. Involving children with disabilities in suchdecisions can be particularly challenging, notleast because <strong>of</strong> ingrained thinking and behaviourthat perceives them as passive victims. Asthe 2011 Report <strong>of</strong> the Secretary-General on theStatus <strong>of</strong> the Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> theChild noted, “It remains difficult for children withdisabilities to have their voices heard. Initiativessuch as school councils and children’s parliaments,consultative processes to elicit children’sviews, as well as judicial proceedings, commonlyfail to ensure the inclusion <strong>of</strong> children with disabilities,or acknowledge their capacities forparticipation.” 88The most underused resource in schools andcommunities all over the world is the childrenthemselves. The Child-to-Child Trust in the UnitedKingdom has worked for many years to promotechildren’s involvement in health education, andin some countries this approach has been usedto good effect as part <strong>of</strong> inclusive education andcommunity-based rehabilitation programmes. 89In participatory research, for example, childrenfrequently highlight the importance <strong>of</strong> a cleanenvironment and hygienic toilets, and for childrenwith disabilities, the issues <strong>of</strong> privacy andaccessibility are paramount. 90 It stands to reasonthat children with disabilities can and must guideand evaluate efforts to advance accessibility andinclusion. After all, who better to understand themeans and impact <strong>of</strong> exclusion?Lines <strong>of</strong> responsibilityAs in other fields <strong>of</strong> endeavour, it will help torealize aspirations for inclusive education if governmentsand their partners are clear about whois to do what and how, and to whom they areexpected to report. Otherwise, the promise <strong>of</strong>inclusion risks becoming a matter <strong>of</strong> lip service.One study <strong>of</strong> countries engaged in what wasonce known as the Education For All Fast TrackInitiative (FTI) and is now called the GlobalPartnership for Education found that ‘‘a number<strong>of</strong> FTI-endorsed countries, particularly thosewhich are approaching universal primary education,do now have national education sectorplans which address the inclusion <strong>of</strong> disabledchildren. […] However, in a number <strong>of</strong> countries,policies and provision for disabled childrenremain cursory or have not been implemented.”91 The report notes that in five FTI-endorsedcountries there was no mention at all <strong>of</strong> childrenwith disabilities.Sometimes, the problem is one <strong>of</strong> divided orunclear mandates: In Bangladesh there is someconfusion about which ministries are responsiblefor children with disabilities <strong>of</strong> school age. Themandate for implementing Education For All lieswith the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and the Ministry <strong>of</strong>Primary and Mass Education, but the education<strong>of</strong> children with disabilities is managed by theMinistry <strong>of</strong> Social Welfare and is seen as amatter <strong>of</strong> charity, not a human rights issue. 92Since 2002, children with disabilities and thosewith special educational needs have been includedin primary education through the PrimaryEducation Development Programme 93 underthe Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education. But managing integratededucational provision for children withvisual impairments and running primary schoolsfor children with hearing, visual or intellectualimpairments remains the responsibility theMinistry <strong>of</strong> Social Welfare. 94Ministries <strong>of</strong> Education should be encouraged totake responsibility for all children <strong>of</strong> school age.Coordination with partners and stakeholders canplay a strong supporting role in this process. InBangladesh, the National Forum <strong>of</strong> OrganizationsWorking with the Disabled promotes networkingbetween the government and NGOs, andhas been instrumental in encouraging greatereducational inclusion as well as a gradual shift<strong>of</strong> ministerial responsibility from social welfareto education. As a consequence, the Campaignfor Popular Education, a national network, hascommitted to ensuring that all children with36THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S CHILDREN 2013: Children with Disabilities
Reading Braille at a school in Uganda. © UNICEF/UGDA2012-00112/Sibilonidisabilities have access to basic and quality education,and the non-governmental BangladeshRural Advancement Committee, which is committedto achieving Education For All and povertyreduction, now includes learners with disabilitiesin its schools.Exclusion denies children with disabilities thelifelong benefits <strong>of</strong> education: a better job, socialand economic security, and opportunities forfull participation in society. In contrast, investmentin the education <strong>of</strong> children with disabilitiescan contribute to their future effectiveness asmembers <strong>of</strong> the labour force. Indeed, a person’spotential income can increase by as much as 10per cent with each additional year <strong>of</strong> schooling. 95But inclusive education can also reduce currentand future dependence, freeing other householdmembers from some <strong>of</strong> their caring responsibilities,and allowing them to resume productiveactivity – or simply to rest. 96Basic reading and writing skills also improvehealth: A child born to a mother who can read is50 per cent more likely to survive past the age <strong>of</strong>5. 97 Lower maternal education has been linkedto higher rates <strong>of</strong> stunting among children inthe urban slums <strong>of</strong> Kenya, 98 Roma settlementsin Serbia, 99 and in Cambodia. 100 Better-educatedBangladeshi parents decreased their child’s risk<strong>of</strong> stunting by up to 5.4 per cent (4.6 per cent inthe case <strong>of</strong> mothers, and between 2.9 and 5.4 percent for fathers), and better-educated Indonesianparents accounted for up to a 5 per cent decrease(between 4.4 and 5 per cent for mothers, and 3 percent for fathers) in their child’s odds <strong>of</strong> stunting. 101Education is both a useful instrument and a right,the purpose <strong>of</strong> which, as stated in the Conventionon the Rights <strong>of</strong> the Child, is to promote “thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> the child’s personality, talentsand mental and physical abilities to theirfullest potential.” 102A STRONG FOUNDATION37