10.07.2015 Views

Boeing-University Relations - A Review and Prospects for the Future

Boeing-University Relations - A Review and Prospects for the Future

Boeing-University Relations - A Review and Prospects for the Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

competition. Today, it is becoming evident that <strong>the</strong> success of engineering in o<strong>the</strong>rcountries such as Japan, China <strong>and</strong> India may be due not just to “cheap labor” but also to“better product <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> money”. This has occurred in one industry after ano<strong>the</strong>r,exemplified by <strong>the</strong> evolution of Japanese automobiles from <strong>the</strong>ir “reputation” <strong>for</strong> cheap,flimsy vehicles, to dominance of objective quality rankings. The same occurred in <strong>the</strong>semiconductor industry. Similar developments are becoming evident in <strong>the</strong> Europeanaerospace industry, which has proved to be faster at adopting technical innovations intoadvanced products than <strong>the</strong>ir American counterparts.The implications to engineering education are yet to be realized – but it is evident fromexperience that engineers graduating from o<strong>the</strong>r nations are quite well-prepared to succeed inAmerican graduate schools. Today it is also becoming evident that uncompromising emphasis onma<strong>the</strong>matical reasoning <strong>and</strong> analytical ability are keys to implementing innovations in advancedtechnology. Graduates from <strong>the</strong> leading European <strong>and</strong> Asian institutions come with superbma<strong>the</strong>matical skills. The superstitions which held that <strong>for</strong>eign schools teach rote learning <strong>and</strong>imitation, while we teach analytical thinking <strong>and</strong> innovation, are debunked by quantitative <strong>and</strong>qualitative evidence.Integrating Industry <strong>and</strong> <strong>University</strong> ViewpointsIn Table 1, we try to summarize <strong>the</strong> major issues that faced industry <strong>and</strong> universities over <strong>the</strong>years. Certainly, issues crossed <strong>the</strong>se pigeonholes, but <strong>the</strong>re are some general trends that gotmore attention in different periods. Over <strong>the</strong> years, <strong>the</strong>re has been increasing communication <strong>and</strong>better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of perspectives, though this is not to claim that <strong>the</strong>re has been, or will oreven need be, total alignment. Table 1 is an attempt to summarize <strong>the</strong> evolution of issuesin<strong>for</strong>mally – no claim is made that <strong>the</strong>se perceptions of issues are generally endorsed.Table 1: Evolution of IssuesPeriod Industry UniversitiesMid- Cold WarResearch vs. Instruction‘80sLate80sEarly90sTransition from mass-producedplat<strong>for</strong>ms to multiple projects <strong>and</strong>small production runs.Total Quality Management.Team project environments.Mid’90s Gulf War 1. Market responsiveness,Production efficiency. Work<strong>for</strong>cefluctuation. Internet revolution.Late‘90s.Dotcom boom. Worker shortage.Global competition starts.Increase design content in curriculum.Developing teaching metrics.Curricular re<strong>for</strong>m initiatives; “ScholarshipRedefined”. Experiential learning.Experiments with new types of curricula.Internet revolution. Integration of pedagogyresearch into university instruction.System lifecycle simulation. Systems designcurricula.Proceedings of <strong>the</strong> 2005 American Society <strong>for</strong> Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright ASEE 2005, American Society <strong>for</strong> Engineering Education.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!