10.07.2015 Views

A ripple in development - Norad

A ripple in development - Norad

A ripple in development - Norad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IntroductionThis report summarises the document review for the Jo<strong>in</strong>t Follow-upEvaluation of the Tsunami Evaluation Coalition – Second Study onL<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Relief Rehabilitation and Development (TEC LRRD 2). It isnot an evaluative document but merely an overview of the availabledocumentary sources.This report consists of two parts:1. The first part exam<strong>in</strong>es what documentary evidence exists on theevaluation themes. This was <strong>in</strong>tended to <strong>in</strong>form the choice of approachdeveloped per theme for the evaluation, without draw<strong>in</strong>gpremature conclusions based on evidence from the documentarystudy. We therefore opted to present the documentary study as responseson the specific questions presented <strong>in</strong> the evaluation Termsof Reference. While these are example questions only and are not<strong>in</strong>tended to represent the full breadth of the evaluation, they havebeen taken as a ‘neutral’ framework for exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the documents.2. The second part presents an annotated bibliography gathered by theteam dur<strong>in</strong>g the research phase. The start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for this was thema<strong>in</strong> bibliography developed for the orig<strong>in</strong>al TEC studies. This wassupplemented by <strong>in</strong>ternet searches and searches of journal databases.The researchers used a snowball<strong>in</strong>g technique to identify furtherreferences from the bibliographies of the <strong>in</strong>itial references located,based on access to bodies of knowledge by national consultants andother members of the team.This ma<strong>in</strong> difference between later versions of this document reviewand the first version is the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the sources. We have added documentsidentified <strong>in</strong> the field research and through further documentsearches. A great deal more work has been put <strong>in</strong>to annotat<strong>in</strong>g the refer-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!