tion. In addition <strong>to</strong> the guilt that mothers face overabortions, fathers face similar guilt. Many times thefather does not support the abortion, but since itis the woman’s choice, he has no say. <strong>The</strong> abovementionedarguments are strong in the anti-abortionmovement.I believe inpro-choice,meaningthat it is everyindividualwoman’sright <strong>to</strong>choose andcontrol herown body.Allowingthe government<strong>to</strong>make decisions about a woman’s right <strong>to</strong> an abortionopens the door <strong>to</strong> further governmental controls. Bygiving the government the right <strong>to</strong> control a woman’sbody, society opens the door <strong>to</strong> taking away personalfreedoms, guaranteed by our Constitution. Whoknows what other controls the government maylegislate in the future? Could it force sterilization,manda<strong>to</strong>ry motherhood or even other birth controlmethods such as the pill?Just becauseabortionsaremade illegaldoesn’tmean thatthey willcease <strong>to</strong>exist; itjust meansthat theywill have<strong>to</strong> be doneillegally. Ifthis happens, back-alley abortions would increase,severely endangering the lives of women. When thishappens, sometimes not just one life is taken, buttwo. If we criminalize abortion, many women willsimply look for other ways <strong>to</strong> get rid of the children,at the risk of endangering themselves. A brief mistakecan take away a woman’s childhood and trapher for life. Pressure <strong>to</strong> have sex at an early age cancreate mistakes, mistakes that have life-long punishment.<strong>The</strong>se mistakes can shatter the life dreams of ayoung individual. When these mistakes happen, thewoman’s right <strong>to</strong> terminate that pregnancy should beavailable as a choice.Abortion is one of the most debated <strong>to</strong>pics inour government <strong>to</strong>day. Pro-life advocates cite the moralwrongdoings of abortion, taking a viable life and the emotionaltraumas that accompany an abortion. Pro-choiceadvocates,on theother hand,strongly believethat itis a woman’sright <strong>to</strong> havecontrol overher ownbody andthat governmentshouldhave no say.I believe inpro-choice,in givingwomen everywhere the right <strong>to</strong> make choices when itcomes <strong>to</strong> their personal body.
To Pants or not <strong>to</strong>Pants?by Federica JonasI I am being forced <strong>to</strong> buy pants. Before this schoolyear started, I had worn pants approximately three times<strong>to</strong> school, and now, I have been coerced in<strong>to</strong> wearingthem at least once a week. Why must I wear pants? Andmore importantly, who is forcing me <strong>to</strong> wear them? Well,in reality I don’t HAVE <strong>to</strong> wear pants. But really, how manydresses and different skirt and shirt combinations canI wear before the cold winter air finallypenetrates my will? Not very many. Afew weekends ago, I did the thing I saidI would never, ever do: buy pants thatare in dress code. I now own two pairs ofpants, corduroys <strong>to</strong> be exact. And I despisethem. I am not proud for having renegedon my sophomore proclamation <strong>to</strong> neverwear pants as long as I studied at <strong>Liggett</strong>.You may be wondering why I would eversay such a thing, and the answer is quitesimple: pants do not meet my standards<strong>to</strong> battle the Nordic hell that falls overMichigan Oc<strong>to</strong>ber through May. <strong>The</strong>y haveseams and a zipper, which let the cold inand make life oh so uncomfortable fora tropical person such as myself. WhereI come from, not even our industrialfreezers reach the temperatures that arereached here. Last year, my leggings andyoga pants kept me from becoming just another iciclethat hung from the eaves of <strong>Liggett</strong>. This year, they haveno such opportunity. <strong>The</strong>y are destined <strong>to</strong> live out theirlives only on the weekends and under my field hockeyskirt after school. This is unfair. Leggings haven’t doneanything <strong>to</strong> anyone; they are simply an essential part ofthe average foreigner’s winter wardrobe. <strong>The</strong>y keep thefreakish winds at bay and make me a feel warmer thanany sort of pant ever would.I do understand where the administration iscoming from. <strong>The</strong>y are trying <strong>to</strong> keep us looking snazzyand nice and apparently leggings do not fit the criteriabecause they are ‘body hugging’ and ‘tight’. <strong>The</strong>y showoff women’s bodies and are much <strong>to</strong>o revealing. In a way,aren’t pants the exact same thing, just made of differentmaterial and with rivets and ‘patch pockets’? I believethey are. Do people think that just because they’re pantsthey’re not form-fitting? <strong>The</strong>y are. Pants show off the humanfigure as much as any garment, leggings and yogapants included. So <strong>to</strong> those of you who do not understandmy dislike of pants know that it is not so much adislike, but it is a sign of the misery <strong>to</strong> come. <strong>The</strong> greatsnows shall come down from Canada or the North Poleor wherever it is they come from, and they will turn mein<strong>to</strong> a hollow shell of my former self. Okay, not really, butthey will make me cranky because of random gusts ofwind that will wind their way in<strong>to</strong> the nooks and cranniesof my pants. I shall have <strong>to</strong> forge on without my leggings,my ‘security blanket’ if you will. I must learn <strong>to</strong> finally becomeAmerican and leave behind the leggings and cus<strong>to</strong>msof the old country in favor of the new cus<strong>to</strong>ms andpants of the United States. In a way, by wearing pants, itis as though I have given up my foreign background andhave become an American. But the only things that keepme from becoming a legitimate American now are thosepesky immigration laws, but those arequite another s<strong>to</strong>ry. However, you shouldall know this: I shall not try <strong>to</strong> be sneakyand fool the powers that be in<strong>to</strong> thinkingthat my leggings are tights without feet orsomething equally ridiculous. I shall wearmy pants with dignity, I shall shake off theice that will inevitably form around mynostrils and eyes, and I shall sit close <strong>to</strong> theradia<strong>to</strong>rs that are probably highly unstablein a vain effort <strong>to</strong> warm up. But if one dayI do not show up <strong>to</strong> class, know that it isbecause the frigid Arctic winds have finallygotten <strong>to</strong> me and that I have turned in<strong>to</strong>an ice statue and am being shipped down<strong>to</strong> the tropical places <strong>to</strong> be defrosted. Eitherthat or I caught the Swine Flu or someother weird disease that is constantlysending the United States in<strong>to</strong> pandemonium,mass hysteria, and chaos.BOTTOM LINE: In the end, pants, leggings, Hardtails, yogapants, they’re all the same. <strong>The</strong>y’re cozy and warm andthey are ALL body hugging. If you don’t want us <strong>to</strong> bewearing clothes that show our shapes, then buy everyonea pota<strong>to</strong> sack and call it a day.25