10.07.2015 Views

Design in the Shroud of Turin - The Shroud of Turin Website

Design in the Shroud of Turin - The Shroud of Turin Website

Design in the Shroud of Turin - The Shroud of Turin Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

15<strong>The</strong> <strong>Shroud</strong> would not itself be complete evidence for <strong>the</strong> Resurrection on<strong>the</strong> Jackson-Trenn <strong>the</strong>ory about its formation, however. 13 An adequate argumentfor a resurrection requires show<strong>in</strong>g (a) that <strong>the</strong> person <strong>in</strong> question was truly dead,not merely comatose, (b) that <strong>the</strong> person’s corpse no longer exists, and (c) that aliv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g identical to <strong>the</strong> person who died has come <strong>in</strong>to existence. 14 On <strong>the</strong>Jackson-Trenn <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>the</strong> <strong>Shroud</strong> does not contribute anyth<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> third <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se requirements. 15 It is directly relevant to <strong>the</strong> first two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se evidentialissues, however.Few <strong>the</strong>ologians now suggest that Jesus was not dead when he was taken<strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> cross, although this idea still does emerge occasionally. 16 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><strong>the</strong>ory under scrut<strong>in</strong>y, however, even if Jesus was not dead when he was placed <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>Shroud</strong>, <strong>the</strong> conjectured weak dematerialization would br<strong>in</strong>g about a dea<strong>the</strong>ven more “complete” than that ord<strong>in</strong>arily experienced, for it hypo<strong>the</strong>sizes notmerely molecular but atomic dissolution. <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> death <strong>in</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ary13 This claim seem to go contrary to conventional views about <strong>the</strong> <strong>Shroud</strong> among those whoconsider it to depict Jesus. <strong>The</strong> conventional view is that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Shroud</strong> was produced by some k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong>“radiance” from <strong>the</strong> resurrected body. It garners support from research <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Shroud</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>1970s that suggested that <strong>the</strong> color variations mak<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>the</strong> Image were similar to <strong>the</strong> colorvariations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> burn marks pla<strong>in</strong>ly present on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Shroud</strong>. But, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Wilson (<strong>The</strong>Mysterious <strong>Shroud</strong>, p. 146) when <strong>the</strong> <strong>Shroud</strong> is irradiated with ultraviolet light, <strong>the</strong> burn marksfluoresce red, but <strong>the</strong> Image does not, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> two have different sources. This result alsorefutes <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r implausible suggestion that <strong>the</strong> Image might have been formed by plac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>cloth over a hot statue.14 In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Resurrection, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Christian orthodoxy, we would also need to <strong>of</strong>ferevidence that <strong>the</strong> resurrected Be<strong>in</strong>g lives an <strong>in</strong>destructible life.15 I have discussed <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> post-Resurrection appearances <strong>in</strong> Visions <strong>of</strong> Jesus: DirectEncounters from <strong>the</strong> New Testament to Today.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!