10.07.2015 Views

Tapping the Potential - Alliance for Excellent Education

Tapping the Potential - Alliance for Excellent Education

Tapping the Potential - Alliance for Excellent Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TA P P I N G T H E P O T E N T I A L : R E TA I N I N G A N D D E V E L O P I N G H I G H - Q U A L I T Y N E W T E A C H E R Sinto <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> community where<strong>the</strong>y work and how it embodies professionalteaching standards. Effective inductiontailors its quality components to localexperiences as well as professional standardsso that teachers become high-qualityeducators well suited to practice in <strong>the</strong>irlocal community, district, and state.Adequate and Stable FundingComprehensive induction requires asignificant and steady financial commitmentto keep it running. With <strong>the</strong>ir dollars,policymakers determine what kind ofinduction teachers will receive. In <strong>the</strong>2003–04 school year, only fifteen statesrequired and funded mentoring-basedinduction programs. 100 Several states facingbudget crises zeroed out funding <strong>for</strong>induction or did not require beginningteachers to be inducted <strong>for</strong> that year.Without steady funding, <strong>the</strong> financialresponsibility <strong>for</strong> induction shifts to localschool districts, <strong>for</strong>cing poor districts to createand finance <strong>the</strong>ir own programs. Somehomegrown programs are successful. Someare not. The un<strong>for</strong>tunate and inequitablereality is that high-poverty schools, whichneed induction <strong>the</strong> most, are usually toopoor, too small, or too understaffed to adequatelysupport <strong>the</strong>ir teachers. The result isthat chance decides <strong>the</strong> fate of teachers inhigh-poverty schools.High-poverty schools,which need induction <strong>the</strong>most, are usually too poor,too small, or toounderstaffed to adequatelysupport <strong>the</strong>ir teachers.States That Required and Funded Mentoring or Induction in 2003–04 101StateArkansasCali<strong>for</strong>niaConnecticutDelawareIndianaIowaKentuckyLouisianaNew JerseyNew MexicoNorth CarolinaOhioSouth CarolinaVirginiaWest VirginiaProgramPathwise ModelBeginning Teacher Support and Assessment Program (BTSA)Beginning Educator Support and Training Program (BEST)Delaware New Teacher Mentoring ProgramBeginning Teacher Induction Program (BTIP)*Beginning Teacher Mentoring and Induction ProgramKentucky Teacher Internship Program (KTIP)Louisiana Teacher Assistance and Assessment Program (LaTAAP)Teachers must complete a two-year mentoring programTeachers must complete a mentoring program of one to three yearsNorth Carolina Initial Licensure ProgramEntry Year ProgramAssisting Developing and Evaluating Professional Teaching (ADEPT)Teachers must complete a one-year mentoring programBeginning Teacher Internships*Beginning in 2006, <strong>the</strong> newly crafted Beginning Teacher Assessment Program will replace BTIP.27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!