Modern surgical treatment of otosclerosis - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Modern surgical treatment of otosclerosis - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Modern surgical treatment of otosclerosis - Helda - Helsinki.fi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Review <strong>of</strong> the literature<br />
demonstrated SNHL, but this was permanent in only 0.2% <strong>of</strong> cases. The most common<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> SNHL was prosthesis displacement further into the vestibulum due to negative<br />
ear pressure in the middle ear, found in 2% patients. Symptoms were similar to Meniere’s<br />
syndrome, including tinnitus, vestibular symptoms and SNHL at low frequencies. The<br />
<strong>treatment</strong> was oral corticosteroids and active aeration <strong>of</strong> the middle ear. The same triad <strong>of</strong><br />
symptoms is seen in patients with a sudden release in perilymph pressure during surgery<br />
in patients with simultaneous endolymphatic hydrops and <strong>otosclerosis</strong>. However, these<br />
patients do not respond as well to <strong>treatment</strong>. The <strong>treatment</strong> protocol for these patients<br />
includes bedrest with the head elevated to 30º for two days and corticoids and intravenous<br />
osmotic agents. Another two aetiological factors for SNHL suggested by Causse (1980)<br />
were impaired cochlear blood flow and the sudden release <strong>of</strong> enzymes into the perilymph.<br />
Surgical intervention for postoperative SNHL is recommended in the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>fi</strong>stula or<br />
granulation formation and if an excessively long prosthesis penetrates too deeply into the<br />
vestibulum (Seicshnaydre et al. 1994, Mann et al. 1996).<br />
Perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stula<br />
In a perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stula (PLF), fluid leaks from the inner ear, leading to a disturbance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cochlear and vestibular function. Some leakage always occurs during stapedectomy, and if<br />
this persists, the <strong>fi</strong>stula is referred to as a primary <strong>fi</strong>stula, but if it occurs after the window<br />
has been successfully sealed for a period <strong>of</strong> time, it is called a secondary <strong>fi</strong>stula. Moon<br />
(1970) explored 49 perilymph <strong>fi</strong>stulas after stapedectomy and the most common symptom<br />
was disequilibrium, which was present in 77% <strong>of</strong> primary and 61% <strong>of</strong> secondary <strong>fi</strong>stulas.<br />
Hearing loss was found in 71% and 77% <strong>of</strong> cases (primary/secondary), and almost half <strong>of</strong><br />
the patients suffered from tinnitus. Fistulas were more common when polyethylene tube<br />
prosthesis and gelatin foam sealant were used. Other factors contributing to <strong>fi</strong>stula, include<br />
the displacement or poor <strong>fi</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis (Moon 1970, Sheehy et al. 1981, Shea 1982).<br />
Althaus and House (1973) report a <strong>fi</strong>stula incidence <strong>of</strong> 89/15648 cases, or 0.6%, from<br />
stapes surgery. More than half <strong>of</strong> these (57%) were in ears that received a polyethylene<br />
tube prosthesis. An evaluation <strong>of</strong> 20 893 stapedectomies with a living tissue graft and a<br />
Teflon prosthesis revealed a PLF incidence <strong>of</strong> 0.02% (Causse and Causse 1980b). Some<br />
authors have even favoured the use <strong>of</strong> no sealing agent. Five cases <strong>of</strong> secondary <strong>fi</strong>stulas<br />
occurring with a mean delay <strong>of</strong> <strong>fi</strong>ve years were found in 1911 stapedotomies without<br />
sealing performed by Marquet (Somers et al. 1994). Clinically, inner ear hydrops present<br />
symptoms similar to PLF. In differential diagnostics, the CT can be helpful if fluid in the<br />
middle ear and/or pneumolabyrinth is shown. These are suggestive <strong>of</strong> PLF (Ayache et al.<br />
2007). The results <strong>of</strong> revision surgeries due to PLF are poor. In Moon’s (1970) study,<br />
hearing afterwards was worse or immutable in 43% <strong>of</strong> patients, 25% still suffered from<br />
tinnitus and 8% continued to have vestibular symptoms.<br />
35