Mosses of the Mediterranean, an annotated checklist - Optima-bot.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

228 R.M. Ros, V. Mazimpaka et al.[118] The only report of Aloina aloides in the Azores was made by Eggers (1982) and it hasbeen later rejected by Sjögren (2001) and Gabriel et al. (2010).[119] Bartramia pomiformis was reported from the Azores by Cunha & Barros (1942: 157)and retained by Casas et al. (1992a: 15), based on Cunha & Barros and a herbariumspecimen (LISU 64491). However it was excluded by Sjögren (2001), because henever found it during his extensive collection trips (pers. comm., 30 April 2010).[120] Campylopus atrovirens was reported from the Azores by Trelease (1897: 184), Cunha& Barros (1942: 157) and Smookler (1967: 50). The species was excluded by Sjögren(2001), but Claro et al. (2009) have recently confirmed a collection made by C. Sérgioin São Jorge Island.Campylopus pilifer var. brevirameus (Dixon) J.-P. Frahm & M. Stech was reportedrecently from the Azores and Madeira by Frahm & Stech (2006).[121] Daltonia splachnoides was first reported from the Azores by Silveira (1937: 244);however Sjögren (2001) stated that all Azorean records correspond to Daltoniastenophylla Mitt.[122] The only report of Dichodontium pellucidum from the Azores was made byHübschmann (1973-1974). However Düll (1992: 30) stated “The record from Ac(leg. v. Hübschmann) belongs to Ptychomitrium nigrescens...” and it was thusexcluded by Sjögren (2001) and Gabriel et al. (2010).[123] The occurrence of Dicranoweisia cirrata in the Azores was considered questionableby Sjögren (2001), but it was accepted by Gabriel et al. (2010).[124] Echinodium spinosum (= Leskea spinosa Mitt., Sciaromium spinosum (Mitt.) Mitt.)was reported from the Azores (without indication of locality or island) by Mitten(1870: 313), and this report has been repeated by other authors such as Trelease(1897: pp. 178), Allorge & Allorge (1946: 385) and Churchill (1986: 121). However, inthe absence of supporting specimens, the species was excluded from the Azores byGabriel et al. (2010).[125] Entosthodon convexus was reported from the Azores by Allorge & Allorge (1952: 70)as Funaria convexa Spruce but was considered questionable by Sjögren (2001).However Cecília Sérgio reviewed all the Entosthodon material collected by Allorgecouple and did not found any Azorean specimen of this species (Cecília Sérgio, pers.comm.). It was therefore excluded by Gabriel et al. (2005).[126] Entosthodon muhlenbergii was considered questionable for the Azores by Gabrielet al. (2005).[127] Fissidens adianthoides and Fissidens crassipes were considered questionable for theAzores by Sjögren (2001), but he did not undertake any further study to clarify theirpresence.[128] Fissidens osmundoides was reported from the Azores by Russel (1862: 137), but itspresence in this archipelago was considered questionable by Trelease (1897: 183) andlater excluded by Sjögren (2001) and Gabriel et al. (2010).Fissidens ovatus Brid. is an African species that apparently has been cited from theAzores through confusion with Fissidens azoricus (= Fissidens ovatus var. azoricus).[129] The only report of Fissidens ovatifolius in the Azores was made by Allorge & Allorge(1946: 334), as Fissidens perssonii P. de la Varde, without any indication of island ordate of collection. It was recently excluded from the Azorean bryoflora by Gabrielet al. (2010).[130] Grimmia incurva was reported from the Azores (Pico) by Allorge & Allorge (1946:379) and Allorge & Allorge (1952: 68), based on a collection by H. Persson. It wasconsidered questionable by Sjögren (2001), but he did not undertake any furtherstudy to clarify its presence in the Azores.[131] Grimmia trichophylla was excluded from the Azores by Sjögren (2001) and Gabrielet al. (2010), following a revision by Erik Sjögren: “the Azorean specimens identified
Mosses of the Mediterranean, an annotated checklist 229as Grimmia trichophylla, G. trichophylla subsp. eutrichophylla and G. trichophyllasubsp. meridionalis correspond to Grimmia lisae” (Erik Sjögren, pers. comm.).Grimmia azorica Renauld & Cardot, reported from the Azores, Canary Islands, andMadeira, was considered a synonym of Grimmia trichophylla by Corley et al. (1981),but Muñoz (1999) synonymised it with Grimmia lisae. This latter treatment isfollowed in Hill et al. (2006).[132] Grimmia montana was considered questionable in the Azores by Sjögren (2001).[133] Gymnostomum calcareum var. atlanticum Sérgio was described by Sérgio (2006) fromAzores, France, Madeira, mainland Portugal and Spain.[134] Hedwigia ciliata was reported from the Azores (without location) by Luisier (1932),but was excluded by Sjögren (2001) and Gabriel et al. (2010).[135] Homalia trichomanoides was excluded from the Azores by Sjögren (2001) andGabriel et al. (2010).[136] Homalothecium lutescens was excluded from the Azores by Sjögren (2001) andGabriel et al. (2010).[137] Homomallium incurvatum was reported from the Azores (Graciosa Island) bySjögren (1990: 69, 89), but he did not include it in his subsequent check-list (Sjögren,2001), nor in his later co-authored check-lists (Gabriel et al., 2005, 2010).[138] According to Sjögren (2001), the presence of Hygroamblystegium varium var. humilein the Azores is doubtful.[139] Hymenoloma crispulum was first reported from the Azores (Pico Island) by Richards,(1937: 133) as Dicranoweisia crispula but its occurrence was considered doubtfulby Gabriel et al. (2005). However the species was reinstated by Gabriel et al. (2010).[140] The occurrence of Hypnum andoi in Macaronesia was considered doubtfulby Hedenäs (1992) and Sjögren (2001).[141] The presence of Leucodon canariensis was considered doubtful in the Azoresby Hedenäs (1992) and González-Mancebo et al. (2009a), in spite of the report byHübschman (1973-1974: 652).[142] Orthotrichum urnigerum was excluded from the Azores by Sjögren (2001) andGabriel et al. (2010).[143] Plagiothecium denticulatum was reported from the Azores by Trelease (1897) andAllorge & Allorge (1946) without localities, and was excluded from the Azoresby Sjögren (2001) and Gabriel et al. (2010).[144] The only report of Pohlia cruda from the Azores (Pico Island) was made by Eggers(1982: 315), but its presence was considered questionable by Sjögren (2001).[145] Bryum caespiticium var. atlanticum Cardot was described from Madeira and later alsoreported from the Azores by several authors. According to Sérgio et al. (2006c), itstaxonomic position requires clarification. If it merits recognition, then a newcombination may be required under Ptychostomum imbricatulum.[146] Racomitrium canescens was reported from the Azores by Allorge & Allorge (1952)and Sjögren (1995), but Cecília Sérgio reviewed all the material collected by Allorgecouple and could not confirm its occurrence. It was subsequently excluded by Sjögren(2001) and Gabriel et al. (2010).[147] The occurrence of Schistidium agasizii in the Azores was considered questionable bySjögren (2001) based on Bremer (1981).[148] Sphagnum pylaesii was reported from the Azores by Sjögren (2001) (from a collectionby René Schumacker), but this proved to be a misidentification, and thus it wasexcluded by Gabriel et al. (2005).
Page 1 and 2:
Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 2013, 34 (2
Page 3 and 4:
Mosses of the Mediterranean, an ann
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
108 R.M. Ros, V. Mazimpaka et al.Mo
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36: 160 R.M. Ros, V. Mazimpaka et al.Mo
Page 53 and 54: Mosses of the Mediterranean, an ann
Page 85: Mosses of the Mediterranean, an ann
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141:
Page 144 and 145:
2 Suppl. mat. R.M. Ros, V. Mazimpak
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
10 Suppl. mat. R.M. Ros, V. Mazimpa
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
100 Suppl. mat. R.M. Ros, V. Mazimp
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
show all

Mosses of the Mediterranean, an annotated checklist - Optima-bot.org

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?