23.11.2012 Views

Telematik 2/02 - Institut für Grundlagen der Informationsverarbeitung ...

Telematik 2/02 - Institut für Grundlagen der Informationsverarbeitung ...

Telematik 2/02 - Institut für Grundlagen der Informationsverarbeitung ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thema<br />

Architecture as Information Editor<br />

Manfred Wolff-Plottegg<br />

<strong>Institut</strong> <strong>für</strong> Gebäudelehre und Entwerfen,<br />

Technische Universität Wien<br />

When I claim I have done something with my<br />

„little finger“ (with no effort at all), this is, as<br />

usual, a slight exaggeration; however, there are<br />

people („The Belly of an Architect“) who say<br />

they act on a gut level – because for them that is<br />

where a whole lot of nerves converge – while<br />

others again claim that it comes from the brain;<br />

and today many things are ascribed to the<br />

computer. Where the processing actually takes<br />

place was perhaps once an issue of location<br />

(traditionally the genius loci), but with growing<br />

experience of dislocation, we might now, in<br />

retrospect, have to admit that topographical<br />

differences cannot really be evidenced by way<br />

of autochthonous results. But the questions<br />

remain: how do lines get drawn on paper and<br />

how do houses appear in the field?<br />

Architecture information<br />

processing I<br />

A client approached me, stating that she wanted<br />

a house for her retirement, with a roof and a<br />

balcony (something between Salzburg and<br />

Tyrolean style), a dream house, illustrated by a<br />

stack of (holiday and souvenir) photos, and a<br />

few „Homes & Gardens“ books: so there was<br />

the English fireplace, the French window, the<br />

terrace like the one on holiday in Greece, of<br />

course Italian terracotta and heavy Spanish<br />

wood, a touch of Bie<strong>der</strong>meier, but also with<br />

windows for flowers and a bit of „bio“ and „eco“<br />

too – an architectural picture puzzle. There is no<br />

point in collecting information if the rules of<br />

processing are unknown. 1<br />

All „own home-buil<strong>der</strong>“ houses follow a selfsimilar<br />

basic pattern. Although a person’s own<br />

individual desire is asserted – all you need is<br />

1 This contract was short-lived, the client<br />

employed another architect to process her<br />

input.<br />

love... – the self-similarity manifests a<br />

microcensus, a favourite collective train of<br />

thought: the precedented, the liking, ...... If the<br />

result is a copy of the desire, i.e. if it is already<br />

known: what is „information processing“ if nothing<br />

is processed? analogue or digital? > merge,<br />

morph, copy/paste; > as in the SIRD 2 mode of<br />

seeing the familiar pattern catches the eye.<br />

Architecture information<br />

processing II<br />

Classical architectural theory is based upon<br />

information processing. And yet in competitions<br />

(with, for example, 100 projects) quite different<br />

solutions may be found and, if we supply even<br />

more information, the results do not become<br />

distinctively different. One might say that this<br />

is not serious information processing. 3 In the<br />

case of the own home-buil<strong>der</strong>, we see an example<br />

of how conventional sources and manipulations<br />

are obsolete: only beginners analyse a site or a<br />

set of parameters for designing, only romantics<br />

and information scientists confide themselves to<br />

their architect in this way and believe that<br />

architecture is an information apparatus. 4<br />

If we are no longer useful in a world without a<br />

subject / object, if we are aimless, desireless and<br />

placeless, information floats without obligation.<br />

The Binary House 5 is architecture production in<br />

that it produces information for interpretations,<br />

manipulation of information as a generator of<br />

architecture.<br />

Architecture information<br />

processing III<br />

In view of the fact that it was only possible to<br />

achieve little deviation and only insufficient<br />

results with the anthropocentric goal- and<br />

content-focused approach the question is whether<br />

external, collective procedure could perhaps help<br />

create any kind of new results. Not the input<br />

(individual desire), but the process determines<br />

the output. The information flow does not go<br />

from the brain (vision, desire....) to expression<br />

(extremity, medium). External processes generate<br />

and offer new information to the brain.<br />

W. A. Mozart (KV 516f „Musical Dice Game“),<br />

A. Cozens (A new method of assisting the<br />

invention in drawing original compositions of<br />

landscape, 1785): „To sketch ... is to transfer<br />

Fig.1: Infotube (Matsumoto/Matsukawa/Wakita) .................................... Information Spaces<br />

2<br />

3<br />

single image random dot<br />

And from the sum of similarities or differences<br />

we cannot draw any reliable conclusions as to<br />

ideas from the mind to the paper ... to blot is to<br />

make varied spots ... producing accidental forms<br />

... from which ideas are presented to the mind ...;<br />

the common defaults. Architecture bluffs with<br />

the reliability and stringency of information<br />

processing.<br />

To sketch is to delineate ideas; blotting suggests<br />

them.“ Without historical, evaluative admixture<br />

4 Managers generally believe that architecture is<br />

the result of decisions. 5 Project and theory: Plottegg already in 1988<br />

52 <strong>Telematik</strong> 1/20<strong>02</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!