10.07.2015 Views

Aspen-Pitkin County Airport Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory ...

Aspen-Pitkin County Airport Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory ...

Aspen-Pitkin County Airport Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AircraftSourceCity of Seattle(2000)TABLE I-2Comparison of <strong>Airport</strong> <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> Inventories<strong>Aspen</strong> CanaryInitiative (2004)Sacramento<strong>Airport</strong> (2004)VancouverBC <strong>Airport</strong>(2004)San Diego<strong>Airport</strong>(2005)Denver(2005)Port of SeattleAviationDivision (2006)LTO na 177,307 170,916 na 348,195Cruise na na Na na 3,816,707Total 344,487 177,307 170,916 4,569,696 4,164,902Ground SupportReported asEquipmentNAdirect andNA 10 26,669 indirect14,051 9,926Ground AccessVehiclesNA 39,723 35,304 21,968 403,354Facilities 1,103 0 Na 211,000 40,636OtherNA 0 Na6 NaTotal (tons) 1,040,000 CO 2-eq 345,590 CO 2-eq 217,040 CO 2-eq 232,889 CO 2 1,595,759 CO 2 4,816,721 CO 2-eq 4,654,330 CO 2Annual OperationsAnnual EnplanedPassengersNotes444,630 (SEA)/359,626 (BFI)43,256 164,805 270,000 209,512 566,036 340,05813,853,299 (SEA)/11,526 (BFI) 180,519 4,671,560 7,850,000 8,686,261 20,675,380 14,989,549Includes Sea-Tacand King <strong>County</strong><strong>Airport</strong>. 1996 IPCCmethods and WRIused. For SEA,includes onlypassengersoriginating fromSeattle locations.Method designedto address localconditions<strong>Emissions</strong> arenoted for CH4 andN20, but notincluded in theabove. Used 2006LTO (EDMS)emissions only.AircraftLTO/EDMS,Mobile6 for GAV<strong>Emissions</strong> arenoted for CH4and N20, but notincluded in theabove.Examined directand indirect,defined weredirect = occur onairport site/LTO(EDMS), indirect:off site, andoutside LTO2006 IPCC Tier 1for aircraft, airportground fleet,facilities and GAV.Does not appear toinclude airline GSEIPCC Tier 2(EDMS/dispensed), EPANonRoad2005for GSE rates.<strong>Emissions</strong> forairportowned/controlled, tenants, andpublicSources: <strong>Aspen</strong> <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong> 2004, For the City of <strong>Aspen</strong>’s Canary Initiative, Climate Mitigation Services, January 2006. <strong>Inventory</strong> and Report: Seattle’s<strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>, City of Seattle, Sept 2002. Final Environmental Impact Report, Sacramento International <strong>Airport</strong> Master; <strong>County</strong> of Sacramento Department ofEnvironmental Review and Assessment, July 2007; <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Inventory</strong> for the City and <strong>County</strong> of Denver, University of Colorado Denver, City and <strong>County</strong> of Denver,Department of Environmental Health, May 2007. Draft EIR <strong>Airport</strong> Master Plan San Diego International <strong>Airport</strong>, October 2007. Port of Seattle, Seattle-Tacoma International<strong>Airport</strong> <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Inventory</strong> - 2006, Synergy Consultants, updated March 2008.- I -15 - 4/3/2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!