Use of California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs) in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CLRA, 2002, California Land Restoration and Reuse Act, California Health andSafety Code, Section 25401 et seq. and section 57008 et seq.,http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html.Johnson, P.C., Kemblowski, M. W., and Johnson, R.L., 1998, Assessing theSignificance of Subsurface Contaminant Vapor Migration to EnclosedSpaces: American Petroleum Institute, Health and Environmental SciencesDepartment, December, 1998, API Publication No. 4674.LBNL, 2002, Analysis of Background Distributions of Metals in the Soil atLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: University of California(Berkeley), Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, June 2002.MADEP, 1994, Background Documentation for the Development of the MCPNumerical Standards: Massachusetts Department of EnvironmentalProtection, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup and Office of Research andStandards, April 1994, www.state.ma.us/dep/ors/orspubs.htm.MADEP, 1995, Guidance For Disposal Site Risk Characterization:Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of WasteSite Cleanup and Office of Research and Standards, July 1995.MOEE, 1996, Rational for the Development and Application of Generic Soil,Groundwater and Sediment Criteria for Use at Contaminated Sites inOntario: Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy, StandardsDevelopment Branch, December, 1996, www.ene.gov.on.ca/.NOAA, 1999, Sediment Screening Reference Tables (SQuiRTs): NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Organization, Coastal Protection andRestoration Division (September 1999),http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/cpr/sediment/squirt/squirt.html.SFBRWQCB, 2003, Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites withContaminated Soil and Groundwater (July 2003): California RegionalWater Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region,http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb2/esl.htm.USEPA, 1988, Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual: U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,Publication EPA/540/1-88/001.USEPA, 1989a, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume I, HumanHealth Evaluation Manual (Part A): U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, PublicationEPA/540/1-89/092.January 20055-2CHHSLS
USEPA, 1989b, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume II,Environmental Evaluation Manual: U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, PublicationEPA/540/1-89/001.USEPA, 1994, Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure: U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, SW-846 Method 1312,September 1994, www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/main.htm.USEPA, 1996, Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and RemedialResponse, Publication 9355.4-17A, May 1996.USEPA, 1997a, Exposure Factors Handbook: U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Office of Research and Development, Publication EPA/600/P-95/002Fa, August 1997.USEPA, 1997b, Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Processfor Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Response Team,Interim Final, June 5, 1997, EPA 540-R-97-006.USEPA, 1999, Estimating Risk From Contaminants Contained in AgriculturalFertilizers (Draft): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of SolidWaste, August 1999,http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/recycle/fertiliz/risk/.USEPA, 2002, Calculating Upper Confidence Limits for Exposure PointConcentrations at Hazardous Waste Sites. U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, December 2002,OSWER 9285.6-10.USEPA, 2003, User’s Guide For The Johnson and Ettinger (1991) Model ForSubsurface Vapor Intrusion Into Buildings: U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, September 1997(and updates), www.epa.gov/oerrpage/superfund/programs/risk/airmodel/johnson_ettinger.htm.USEPA, 2004, Preliminary Remediation Goals: U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region IX, October 2002, www.epa.gov/region09/waste/sfund/prg/index.htm.January 20055-3CHHSLS
Page 4: 4-1. SUGGESTED REFERENCES FOR EVALU
Page 8 and 9: document in general. The soil, soil
Page 10 and 11: Soil and soil gas data collected at
Page 12 and 13: The CHHSLs presented in this docume
Page 14 and 15: (Page intentionally left blank)Janu
Page 16 and 17: the lookup tables for sites with ot
Page 18 and 19: Steps 4 - Determine the Desired Lan
Page 20 and 21: esources even though direct exposur
Page 22 and 23: concerns should generally be adequa
Page 24 and 25: examples include the soil direct-ex
Page 26 and 27: the evaluation of potential contami
Page 30 and 31: 3.2 Tier 2 Human Health Risk Assess
Page 34 and 35: Additional evaluation should be car
Page 50 and 51: Table 1. California Human Health Sc
Page 62 and 63: as a stand-alone tool for the evalu
Page 64 and 65: Similar ESLs are also provided for
Page 66 and 67: USEPA Region IX staff can be contac

Use of California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs) in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?