Herding Cats and Sheep: Assessing State and Regional ... - UPR Info

Detentionconditions 4.4 6 6 20 6 62 100Specialprocedures4.3 1 12 29 24 34 100Minorities 4.1 12 19 12 12 45 100Human rightseducation andtraining 4.1 18 20 18 9 35100As we have seen previously, Africa and Asia exhibit common approaches to the UPR.Here they had very similar patterns of recommendations by issue, and consistently made thefewest recommendations with the exception of minorities and human rights education andtraining. EEG recommendations were very evenly distributed across the board. GRULACfocused most on the use of international instruments and Special Procedures i.e. the process ofinternational protection of human rights, more so than on specific thematic areas. WEOG’sactivist approach to the UPR is further reflected by its across the board prominence in makingrecommendations; it made at least a third of the recommendations in all of these issue categories,and more than 50% in justice, and torture and detention conditions (62%).The four largest percentages of issues which were not accepted by Africa and Asiaincluded women’s rights, death penalty, torture, and use of HRC Special Procedures. Key issuesrejected by northern countries included abolition of the death penalty and greater protection forthe rights of children.The divergent nature of state behaviour by issue type is starkly defined by the followingtable. The first two issues relate to the international human rights regime, and ways that it can be30