11.07.2015 Views

EconS 301 – Intermediate Microeconomics Review Session #13 ...

EconS 301 – Intermediate Microeconomics Review Session #13 ...

EconS 301 – Intermediate Microeconomics Review Session #13 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With this utility function both lotteries have the same expected value and same expectedutility. In general, when two lotteries have the same expected value and differentvariances, a risk-neutral decision maker will be indifferent between the two lotteries, i.e.,will have the same expected utility for both lotteries. Thus, this utility functioncorresponds with a risk-neutral decision maker.d)Expected Utility 0.90(0 500) 0.10(400 500)Expected Utility 306,000AA2 2Expected UtilityB0.50(30 500) 0.50(50 500)Expected Utility 291,700B2 2With this utility function the decision maker has a higher expected utility for Lottery Athan for Lottery B. In general, when two lotteries have the same expected value butdifferent variances, a risk-loving decision maker will prefer the lottery with the highervariance, Lottery A in this case.Exercise 15.12 Suppose you are a risk averse decision maker with a utility function given by 110 , where I denotes your monetary payoff from an investment in thousands. You are considering aninvestment that will give you a payoff of $10,000 (thus, I=10) with probability 0.6 and a payoff of $5,000(I=5) with probability 0.4. It will cost you $8,000 to make the investment. Should you make theinvestment? Why or why not?Answer:Let’s simply compare the payoff of not making the investment versus the payoff of making theinvestment…If you do not make the investment, your utility is: 1 – 10(8) -2 = 0.84375If you make the investment, your utility is:(0.6)(1 – 10(10) -2 ) + (0.4)(1-10(5) -2 )= (0.6)(0.9) + (0.4)(0.6) = 0.78Since the expected utility from the investment is less than the utility from not making the investment, youshould not make the investment.Exercise 15.18 Consider a market of risk-averse decision makers, each with a utility function √.Each decision maker has an income of $90,000, but faces the possibility of a catastrophic loss of$50,000 in income. Each decision maker can purchase an insurance policy that fully compensateshere for her loss. This insurance policy has a cost of $5,900. Suppose each decision makerpotentially has a different probability q of experiencing the loss.a) What is the smallest value of q so that a decision maker purchases insurance?4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!