11.07.2015 Views

International Tax Aspects of Foreign Currency Transactions

International Tax Aspects of Foreign Currency Transactions

International Tax Aspects of Foreign Currency Transactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(b)Brazilian ORTNs.During a period <strong>of</strong> hyper-inflation in Brazil, the Braziliangovernment instituted a “peg” to the taxpayer’s tax liability, whichwas due in 12 monthly installments. The tax was assessed in afixed number <strong>of</strong> ORTNs at year end. 1/12 <strong>of</strong> each ORTN was thenconverted into cruzeiros at the spot rate for each month <strong>of</strong>payment. Due to inflation, the total number <strong>of</strong> cruzeiros actuallypaid exceeded the amount accrued at the end <strong>of</strong> the year.Rev. Rul. 91-21 & CCA #003802 – the IRS set out its position thatthe amount <strong>of</strong> “foreign tax liability” for purposes <strong>of</strong> § 901 and§ 902 was the dollar value <strong>of</strong> the Cruzeiros when paid at eachmonthly due date.Thus, in the case <strong>of</strong> a branch, the total § 901 credit equaled theamount <strong>of</strong> cruzeiros paid, translated at the spot rates on the date <strong>of</strong>payment.In the case <strong>of</strong> a corporation, under the translation rules then ineffect under § 902, the tax was equal to the dollar value <strong>of</strong> theORTN liability on the dividend payment date. It was notredetermined to reflect the subsequent inflation in the cruzeiro. Asthe court recognized in AMP, applying § 905(c) to redetermine thetaxes would result in a hyping <strong>of</strong> the § 902 credit for the year <strong>of</strong>the dividend payment.AMP, Inc. v. United States,185 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 1999) –Reversing the Court <strong>of</strong> Claims, the Federal Circuit ruled that the§ 905(c) regulations reference to “units <strong>of</strong> currency” accrued orpaid meant the Cruzeiro not the ORTN. Therefore, the currencyfluctuation was required to be taken into account.The court noted that the 1986 Act corrected the issue in the case byrequiring hyperinflationary currencies to use the US dollar.Inflationary currencies now must be translated at the spot rate, 20and § 902 credits with respect to inflationary QBUs must beredetermined at the U.S. parent level and not as a poolingadjustment. 21 This causes the implicit currency gain in a payment<strong>of</strong> inflationary taxes to be treated as a reduction <strong>of</strong> the taxes paid.2021§ 986(a)(1)(C).Reg. § 1.905-3T(d)(3)(i).32© 2013 William R. Skinner, Esq.Fenwick & West LLPwrskinner@fenwick.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!