11.07.2015 Views

Essentials of Planning and Managing by Objectives

Essentials of Planning and Managing by Objectives

Essentials of Planning and Managing by Objectives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Examples <strong>of</strong> objectives for key result areas are the following: toobtain a 10 percent return on investment <strong>by</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> calendar year2005 (pr<strong>of</strong>itability); to increase the number <strong>of</strong> units <strong>of</strong> product Xproduced <strong>by</strong> 7 percent <strong>by</strong> June 30, 2005 without raising costs orreducing the current quality level (productivity).The objectives have to be further translated into those <strong>of</strong>divisions, departments, <strong>and</strong> units down to the lowest level <strong>of</strong> theorganization.Setting objectives <strong>and</strong> the organizational hierarchyAs Figure 4-3 shows, managers at different levels in theorganizational hierarchy are concerned with different kinds <strong>of</strong>objectives. The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>and</strong> top-level managers are verymuch involved in determining the purpose, the mission, <strong>and</strong> theoverall objectives <strong>of</strong> the firm, as well as the more specific overallobjectives in the key result areas. Middle-level managers, such asthe vice president or manager <strong>of</strong> marketing or the productionmanager, are involved in the setting <strong>of</strong> key-result area objectives,division objectives, <strong>and</strong> departmental objectives. The primaryconcern <strong>of</strong> lower-level managers is setting the objectives <strong>of</strong>departments <strong>and</strong> units as well as <strong>of</strong> their subordinates. Althoughindividual objectives, consisting <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>and</strong> developmentgoals, are shown at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the hierarchy, managers at higherlevels also should set objectives for their own performance <strong>and</strong>development.' There are different views about whether an organization shoulduse the top-down or the bottom-up approach in setting objectives, asindicated <strong>by</strong> the arrows in Figure 4-3. In the top-down approachupper-level managers determine the objectives for subordinates,while in the bottom-up approach subordinates initiate the setting <strong>of</strong>objectives for their positions <strong>and</strong> present them to their superior.Proponents <strong>of</strong> the top-down approach suggest that the totalorganization needs direction through corporate objectives provided<strong>by</strong> the chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficer (in conjunction with the board <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!