disputes with one another along their respective boundaries. The problem has persisted for decades withno solution at sight. Not just the local inhabitants, he said, but claimant states would benefit from such aformulation by developing the region jointly into, perhaps, Special Economic Zones or take up otherdevelopmental initiatives. The financial benefits would then be shared equally by the states and wouldeventually percolate to the inhabitants. ''There can be central institutes that can be brought up in theseareas or any other developmental initiatives taken up jointly. But the question is can we bypass thedispute and get into development,'' Haldar asked. In the Meghalaya and Assam context, there are 12disputed areas. Much of these <strong>land</strong>s are in utter neglect although these are substantially large in size.Assam and Naga<strong>land</strong> boundary dispute has continued from 1968 and recently the Supreme Courtappointedpanel has submitted its report to the Chief Justice to find a solution to the problem. Similarly,Assam-Arunachal and Arunachal-Naga<strong>land</strong> has boundary disputes. On the reopening of Stilwell road, MrHaldar said the northeast must first think in terms of becoming an 'originator of goods and service' beforetaking to this world war era road. ''The Stilwell road was never a trade route, it was meant for militarypurposes and for that too it was seldom used. The northeast must not think merely of being the transit butan originator of goods and services that can be exported,'' he suggested. (New Kerala 20/10/11)Court cancels <strong>acquisition</strong> in 3 Noida villages, hikes compensation (4)Allahabad, Oct 21 : The Allahabad High Court Friday ordered cancellation of <strong>land</strong> <strong>acquisition</strong> in threevillages of Noida and Greater Noida, besides declaring a 64 percent hike in the compensation foracquired <strong>land</strong>. A special three-judge bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, S.U. Khan and V.K.Shukla gave the verdict on a joint writ petition moved by 491 farmers from more than a dozen villages inGautam Budh Nagar district, forming Noida and Greater Noida. More than 3,000 hectares of <strong>land</strong> wasacquired by the Uttar Pradesh government for large scale urbanization in these areas. The judgment will,however, jeopardise the dreams of thousands of applicants who were hoping to own a home underdifferent housing schemes undertaken in the three villages - Deola, Chak-Shahberi (Greater Noida) andAsadullahpur (Noida) - where the court has quashed the <strong>acquisition</strong>. Farmers of these three villages havebeen entitled to restoration of their acquired <strong>land</strong>, subject to return of all compensation they have receivedso far. The court said: "The Greater Noida Authority and its allottees are directed not to carry ondevelopment and not to implement the Master Plan 2021 till the observations and directions of theNational Capital Regional Planning Board are incorporated in Master Plan 2021 to the satisfaction of theNational Capital Regional Planning Board. " The court further called for immediate suspension of allconstruction and urbanization activity in 40 villages of Greater Noida until a clearance was obtained froman officer of the rank of principal secretary that the work was in accordance with the norms laid down bythe National Capital Region (NCR) Planning Board. Meanwhile, 19 other petitions moved on behalf offarmers of two other villages were rejected as these were "time-barred". In addition to monetarycompensation, the Noida and Greater Noida authorities have also been directed to give developed <strong>land</strong> toevery farmer, whose <strong>land</strong> was acquired. "All the petitioners shall be entitled for allotment of developed'Abadi' plot to the extent of 10 percent of their acquired <strong>land</strong> subject to a maximum of 2,500 sq metres."We, however, leave it open to the Authority in cases where allotment of Abadi plot to the extent of sixpercent or eight percent have already been made either to make allotment of the balance of the area ormay compensate the <strong>land</strong> owners by payment of the amount equivalent to balance area as per averagerate of allotment made of developed residential plots," the court ruled. Litigation in Noida and GreaterNoida has been on the rise ever since the Mayawati government took up large scale urbanization in andaround the entire area. What sparked off major trouble was violent protests which put the stategovernment in a tight spot, particularly after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi plunged in to take up thecause of farmers. What came as a morale booster for them was the order of the high court May 12,striking down the <strong>acquisition</strong> of 156 hectares of <strong>land</strong> in Shahberi village. The court cancelled the<strong>acquisition</strong> on the plea that <strong>land</strong> was acquired in the village in the name of "planned industrialdevelopment of Greater Noida", but later handed over to private developers for building housing projects."The state government's appeal against the high court was later struck down by the Supreme Court, whichfurther encouraged more farmers to challenge the <strong>acquisition</strong> of <strong>land</strong> in larger areas around. As the issueacquired larger magnitude, with the fate of hundreds of farmers, real estate companies and thousands offlat buyers at stake, the court decided to constitute a special three-judge bench to take up the matter onwhich the verdict was pronounced Friday. Reacting to the judgment, farmers' counsel Lalji Thakur toldmediapersons: "We welcome the court's decision to increase the compensation, but we still feel that<strong>acquisition</strong> in several villages needs to be scrapped." "A final decision on making an appeal to the
Supreme Court would be taken only after I have had a detailed discussion with my farmer clients," hesaid. (New Kerala 21/10/11)Displaced youth yet to get promised jobs (4)MANGALORE: Four months after they were promised of appointment letters by Nalim Kumar Kateel, MP,and district in-charge Minister J. Krishna Palemar, 1,063 families displaced by the Mangalore SpecialEconomic Zone are nowhere closer to getting jobs. In particular, Mr. Palemar, on July 13, promised jobsto the project displaced families and a monthly stipend of Rs. 10,000 till they began work. While 1,664families have been displaced by MSEZ, 601 opted for a one-time cash payment in lieu of a job. The rest,however, registered one nominee each with the Deputy Commissioner for jobs to be provided by MSEZ.As many as 392 families are pursuing studies on their own, and 411 nominees were given training byMSEZ at the Karnataka Polytechnic for a specially designed course . During the KPT course and after,the students have been agitating for jobs and had stopped construction of Phase III of MangaloreRefinery and Petrochemical for several days. Mr. Palemar and Mr. Kumar had promised the students thatall project displaced families empanelled with the Deputy Commissioner for jobs would be grantedappointment letters. Four months later, the situation has not changed for them. Mr. Palemar told theKarnataka Development Programmes review meeting on Saturday that the promise would be fulfilled inthree days. (The Hindu 23/10/11)Polavaram: Raghavulu slams State (4)KHAMMAM, October 27, <strong>2011</strong>: CPI (M) State secretary B.V. Raghavulu on Tuesday alleged that theState government proceeded with the tender process of Polavaram project without seriously studying thealternative plans proposed by the technical experts to reduce submergence and protect large tracts oftribal and forest <strong>land</strong>s from flooding. Addressing a press conference here on Tuesday, Mr Raghavuludeplored that the government did not even bother to give a serious thought to the alternative proposalsput forth by the CPI (M) to reduce flooding of tribal <strong>land</strong>s. The alternative plan encompassing viabletechnically feasible suggestions like reducing the height of the dam of Polavaram project and constructionof tunnels and balancing reservoirs to minimise <strong>displacement</strong> besides saving money and time, he said,adding the Supreme Court had earlier advised the government to study the alternative plan. MrRaghavulu said if the project was allowed to be constructed as per the original design, it would not onlycause extensive submergence of the tribal <strong>land</strong>s but also prove counterproductive in terms of hugeexpenditure involved in it. Although the Central government came up with a draft Land Acquisition,Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Bill, the State government chose to award Polavaram projectconstruction works without completing the rehabilitation process for rendering justice to over two lakhtribal people bound to be displaced by the project, he criticised. He demanded that the governmentshould examine the alternative plan and redesign the project accordingly. On the plight of the farmers, hereiterated his demand for declaration of drought-hit mandals and sanction of compensation forthwith. Thegovernment should waive the crop loans of all the distressed farmers to help them overcome the presentcrisis, he demanded. CPI (M) central committee member T Veerabhadram, district secretary P.Sudarshan Rao, and executive committee member N Nageswara Rao were among those present. (TheHindu 27/10/11)Tata Motors challenges Singur order (4)Kolkata, October 29, <strong>2011</strong>: Tata Motors on Saturday challenged the order of the single judge of theCalcutta high court, which had upheld the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, <strong>2011</strong>, bywhich West Bengal government vested the <strong>land</strong> leased to the company at Singur, before a division benchof the court. The Tata Motors has appealed against the order of justice IP Mukerji which was passed onSeptember 28 and gave a copy of the petition to government pleader Ashok Kumar Banerjee. Thepetition is likely to be moved before a division bench of the high court after it reopens on October 31. Thehigh court has held the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act <strong>2011</strong> to be constitutional. Thecourt had, however, ordered on September 28 an unconditional stay of the judgement till November twoto allow any aggrieved party to file an appeal, if it so desired. Tata Motors, which was to set up its Nanocar plant at Singur, had moved to Sanand in Gujarat in 2008 citing a law and order problem. (TheHindustan Times 29/10/11)Tatas seek two Singur order (4)