The Socio-Economic Importance of Scientific Research To Canada

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Socio-Economic Importance of Scientific Research to Canada Page 49© David A. Wolfe and Ammon SalterBIBLIOGRAPHYAbramovitz, M. (1986), ‘Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind’, Journal of EconomicHistory, 46:2 (June).Acs, Z. J., D. Audretsch, and M. Feldmann (1991), ‘Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment’,American Economic Review, 82, pp. 363-367.Adams, James (1990), ‘Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth’, Journal ofPolitical Economy, 98, pp. 673-702.Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt (1995), ‘Research and Development in the Growth Process’,Journal of Economic Growth 1:1, pp. 49-73.Arrow, Kenneth (1962), ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in R.Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activities, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp.609-625.Arundel, A., G. Van de Paal and L. Soete (1995), PACE Report: Innovation Strategies of Europe’sLargest Firms: Results of the PACE Survey for Information Sources, Public Research, Protection ofInnovations, and Government Programmes, Final Report, MERIT, University of Limberg, Maastricht.Baldwin, John and Morena Da Pont (1996), Innovation in Canadian Manufacturing Enterprises:Survey of Innovation and Advanced Technology 1993, Cat. No. 88-513-XPB, Statistics Canada,Ottawa.Bania, N., R. Eberts, and M. Fogarty (1993), ‘Universities and the Start-up of New Companies’,Review of Economics and Statisitcs, (November).Brooks, Harvey (1996) ‘The Evolution of US Science Policy’, in Bruce L.R. Smith and Claude E.Barfield (eds), Technology, R&D and the Economy, The Brookings Institution and the AmericanEnterprise Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 15–48.Bush, Vannevar (1945), Science, The Endless Frontier: A Report to the President, US GovernmentPrinting Office, Washington, DC.Callon, M. (1994), ‘Is Science a Public Good’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 19, pp. 345-424.CAUT (1997), ‘The Liberal Record on R&D’ CAUT Bulletin, May, p. 11.Cohen, Wes and David Levinthal (1989), ‘Innovation and Learning: the Two Faces of R&D’,Economic Journal, 99, pp. 569-596.49
The Socio-Economic Importance of Scientific Research to Canada Page 50© David A. Wolfe and Ammon SalterCongressional Budget Office (1993), A Review of Edwin Mansfield’s Estimate of the Rate of Returnfrom Academic Research and its Relevance to the Federal Budget Process, CBO Staff Memorandum,April, pp. 1-26.Cooke, P. and K. Morgan (1993). ‘The Network Paradigm: New Departures in Corporate andRegional Development’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11, pp. 543-64.Dasgupta, P. and P. David, (1994), ‘Towards a New Economics of Science’, Research Policy, 23, pp.487-521.David, P. and D. Foray (1995), ‘Accessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Base’, STIReview, OECD, Paris, pp. 13-68.David, P., D. Mowery, and W. E. Steinmueller (1992), ‘Analysing the Economic Payoffs from BasicResearch’, Economics, Innovation and New Technology, 2, pp. 73-90.de la Mothe, John (1996), ‘One Small Step in an uncertain direction: the Science and TechnologyReview and public adminstration in Canada’, Canadian Public Administration 39:3, pp. 403-417.Dennison, E. (1985), Accounting for Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Dosi, G. (1984), ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: the Determinants andDirection of Technological Change and the Transformation of the Economy’, in Christopher Freeman,(ed.), Long Waves in the World Economy, Frances Pinter, London, pp. 78-101.Dosi, G. (1988), ‘Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’, Journal ofEconomic Literature 26, pp. 1120-71.Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., Chris Freeman, Richard Nelson, Luc Soete (1988), Technical Change andEconomic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Drucker, Peter F. (1993), Post–Capitalist Society, Harperbusiness, New York.Dufour, P. (1994), ‘A Road Map through Rhetoric and Reality: Some Observations on 30 Years ofFederal S&T Reviews’, in Government of Canada, Resource Book for Science and TechnologyConsultations, Vol. II, Secretariat for Science and Technology Review, Industry Canada, Ottawa, pp.21-32.Dufour, P. and J. de la Mothe (1993), ‘The Organization, Structure and Decision Processes of Scienceand Technology’, in P. Dufour and J. de la Mothe, (eds), Science and Technology in Canada, Harlow:Longman, pp. 23-46.Edquist, Charles, ed. (1997), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations,Pinter, London and Washington.50
Page 1 and 2: The Socio-Economic Importance of Sc
Page 49: The Socio-Economic Importance of Sc
Page 57: The Socio-Economic Importance of Sc

The Socio-Economic Importance of Scientific Research To Canada

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?