14GenJudgment: Restra<strong>in</strong>t [or Still<strong>in</strong>g] takes place with <strong>the</strong> back, so <strong>the</strong> person <strong>in</strong> question doesnot obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r person. He goes <strong>in</strong>to that one’s courtyard but does not see him <strong>the</strong>re.There is no blame.Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Judgment: Gen means “stop.” When it is time to stop, oneshould stop; when it is time to act, one should act. If <strong>in</strong> one’s activity <strong>and</strong> reposehe is not out <strong>of</strong> step with <strong>the</strong> times, his Dao should be bright <strong>and</strong> glorious. LetRestra<strong>in</strong>t operate where restra<strong>in</strong>t should take place, that is, let <strong>the</strong> restra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g bedone <strong>in</strong> its proper place. Those above <strong>and</strong> those below st<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> reciprocalopposition to each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> so do not get along. This is <strong>the</strong> reason why, although“one does not obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r person,” <strong>and</strong> “one goes <strong>in</strong>to one’s courtyard butdoes not see him <strong>the</strong>re, yet “<strong>the</strong>re is no blame.”Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Images: United mounta<strong>in</strong>s [i.e. doubled Gen trigrams]: thisconstitutes <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> Restra<strong>in</strong>t. In <strong>the</strong> same way, <strong>the</strong> exemplary person ism<strong>in</strong>dful <strong>of</strong> how he should not go out <strong>of</strong> his position.L<strong>in</strong>e 1: Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> toes, so <strong>the</strong>re is no blame, <strong>and</strong> it is fitt<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>person <strong>in</strong> question practices perpetual perseverance.Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Images: If “Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> toes,” one shallnever violate <strong>the</strong> bounds <strong>of</strong> rectitude [or “stray <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> correct path”].L<strong>in</strong>e 2: Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> calves, which means that <strong>the</strong> person <strong>in</strong> questiondoes not raise up [i.e. rescue] his followers. His heart feels discontent.Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Images: “The person <strong>in</strong> question does not raise up hisfollowers, nor does he withdraw <strong>and</strong> obey <strong>the</strong> call.”L<strong>in</strong>e 3: Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> midsection, which may split <strong>the</strong> flesh at <strong>the</strong>backbone, 1 a danger enough to smoke <strong>and</strong> suffocate <strong>the</strong> heart.Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Images: If “Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> midsection,” <strong>the</strong>danger would “smoke <strong>and</strong> suffocate <strong>the</strong> heart.”L<strong>in</strong>e 4: Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> torso. There is no blame.1 Variant characters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mawangdui version <strong>of</strong> this l<strong>in</strong>e suggest <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> “scratch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>sp<strong>in</strong>e” ra<strong>the</strong>r than “splitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> back flesh.
15Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Images: “Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> torso,” which meansthat <strong>the</strong> person <strong>in</strong> question applies restra<strong>in</strong>t to his own body.L<strong>in</strong>e 5: Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> jowls, so <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person <strong>in</strong> question areordered, <strong>and</strong> regret vanishes.Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Images: “Restra<strong>in</strong>t takes place with <strong>the</strong> jowls,” so <strong>the</strong> person<strong>in</strong> question is central <strong>and</strong> correct.L<strong>in</strong>e 6: The person <strong>in</strong> question exercises Restra<strong>in</strong>t with simple honesty, which results <strong>in</strong>good <strong>for</strong>tune.Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Images: The good <strong>for</strong>tune that spr<strong>in</strong>gs from “exercis<strong>in</strong>gRestra<strong>in</strong>t with simple honesty,” means that one will reach his proper end because<strong>of</strong> that simply honesty.Although <strong>the</strong>se glosses from <strong>the</strong> Ten W<strong>in</strong>gs certa<strong>in</strong>ly did not resolve all ambiguities orelim<strong>in</strong>ate all future controversies regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> possible mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Gen’s judgment <strong>and</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e statements, <strong>the</strong>y did underscore a radical <strong>in</strong>terpretive shift that trans<strong>for</strong>med <strong>the</strong> Genhexagram from an apparent description <strong>of</strong> a ritualized sacrifice to a set <strong>of</strong> prescriptions<strong>for</strong> self control <strong>and</strong> ethical behavior.In short, <strong>the</strong> Ten W<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Yij<strong>in</strong>g, even without <strong>the</strong> alternative read<strong>in</strong>gs provided by<strong>the</strong> Mawangdui manuscript <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r versions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Changes, vastly enhanced itssymbolic repertoire. Although <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> classic became “fixed” <strong>in</strong> 136 BCE, <strong>for</strong><strong>the</strong> next two thous<strong>and</strong> years scholars <strong>and</strong> div<strong>in</strong>ers enjoyed an enormous amount <strong>of</strong>latitude <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> work. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> Great Commentary became <strong>the</strong>locus classicus <strong>for</strong> virtually all Ch<strong>in</strong>ese discussions <strong>of</strong> time, space <strong>and</strong> metaphysics,<strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Yij<strong>in</strong>g with extraord<strong>in</strong>ary philosophical authority. In addition, this amplified<strong>and</strong> state-sanctioned version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Changes became a repository <strong>of</strong> concrete symbols <strong>and</strong>general explanations that proved serviceable <strong>in</strong> such diverse realms <strong>of</strong> knowledge as art,literature, music, ma<strong>the</strong>matics, science <strong>and</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>e.O<strong>the</strong>r Han-Based HermeneuticsApproaches to <strong>the</strong> Yij<strong>in</strong>g—whe<strong>the</strong>r scholarly or div<strong>in</strong>atory—have naturally h<strong>in</strong>ged onfactors such philosophical or religious affiliations, <strong>in</strong>tellectual fashions, politics, socialstatus, gender, personal taste, family ties, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r variables <strong>of</strong> time, place <strong>and</strong>circumstance. As Ch<strong>in</strong>ese society evolved, new ways <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> classic arose,<strong>in</strong>exorably exp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretive possibilities to <strong>in</strong>clude virtually everyemerg<strong>in</strong>g realm <strong>of</strong> knowledge. Thus, over <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> more than two millennia,thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> commentaries were written on <strong>the</strong> Changes, each amplify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> text <strong>and</strong>each reflect<strong>in</strong>g a dist<strong>in</strong>ctive technical, philological, religious, philosophical, literary,social or political po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view. Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> document came to beidentified by a number <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese scholars as a “mirror <strong>of</strong> history” as well as <strong>the</strong> “mirror<strong>of</strong> men’s m<strong>in</strong>ds.”