11.07.2015 Views

Tools for More Accurate Inpatient Cost Estimates with HCUP ...

Tools for More Accurate Inpatient Cost Estimates with HCUP ...

Tools for More Accurate Inpatient Cost Estimates with HCUP ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

acute and long-term care units, operating room, radiology department, laboratories, varioustherapies, pharmacy, clinic, and all ancillary units.We then applied the cost-center specific and hospital-wide CCRs to qualified SID discharges <strong>for</strong>each MS-DRG or CCS category. The relative cost of each MS-DRG (or CCS category) wascalculated as mean cost per case, in that MS-DRG (or CCS category) was divided by mean costacross all MS-DRGs (or CCS categories). The AF was the ratio of relative cost based on costcenterspecific CCRs to the relative cost based on the hospital-wide CCR. We only used aspecific MS-DRG or CCS category if it had a minimum of 10 hospitals <strong>with</strong> at least 30 caseseach. The remaining diagnostic categories were combined in the final results.ResultsWe defined 746 MS-DRG categories and 262 CCS categories. We calculated relative cost andAFs <strong>for</strong> 449 distinct MS-DRG categories and 227 distinct CCS categories. For the remaining297 MS-DRG and 35 CCS categories, we could only calculate a group AF.The resulting AFs ranged between 0.815 and 1.383 <strong>for</strong> MS-DRGs (0.864 and 1.396 <strong>for</strong> CCScategories). However, 87.5% of distinct AFs <strong>for</strong> MS-DRGs were between 0.90 and 1.10; 82.8%of distinct AFs were <strong>with</strong>in this range <strong>for</strong> CCS categories. Both of the grouped AFs <strong>for</strong> the MS-DRG and CCS categories were in the range of 0.90 and 1.10. If we included the groupedcategories, 92.5% of AFs <strong>for</strong> MS-DRGs and 85.1% of AFs <strong>for</strong> CCS categories were between0.90 and 1.10, respectively.Cases <strong>with</strong> high AFs (above 1.0) tended to involve long stays <strong>for</strong> mental conditions andcomplications from deliveries. Cases <strong>with</strong> low AFs (below 1.0) included patients requiringextensive diagnostic services such as imaging, laboratory testing, drugs, and select surgeries.ConclusionIn general, department-specific CCRs are more accurate <strong>for</strong> deriving the cost of a hospital staythan hospital-wide CCRs. However, not all statewide data agencies ask hospitals to reportdetailed charges <strong>for</strong> every case, and not all hospitals have usable CMS accounting reports. It is2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!