11.07.2015 Views

Mid-Year Review of the Work Plan for Sudan 2012 - Global ...

Mid-Year Review of the Work Plan for Sudan 2012 - Global ...

Mid-Year Review of the Work Plan for Sudan 2012 - Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UNITED NATIONS AND PARTNERS[1] <strong>2012</strong> IN REVIEW | ANALYSIS OF FUNDING TO DATESUDAN WORK PLAN <strong>2012</strong>19ANALYSIS OF FUNDING TO DATEThe resource requirement <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sudan</strong> at <strong>the</strong> MYR <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HWP<strong>2012</strong> is $1.05 billion, which is a 1.3% decrease from <strong>the</strong> originalrequirement <strong>of</strong> $1.065 billion.Funding <strong>for</strong> humanitarian activities in <strong>Sudan</strong> has reducedsignificantly in <strong>2012</strong>, compared with previous years. As <strong>of</strong>June 30, only $458 million, or 43% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> needs specified in<strong>the</strong> <strong>2012</strong> HWP, has been contributed, while <strong>the</strong> correspondingfigures <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> same date in 2009, 2010 and 2011 were56%, 52% and 55% respectively. This sharp drop in funding,<strong>of</strong> 24% in real terms compared to last year, has come in spite<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that humanitarian needs in <strong>Sudan</strong> have remainedrelatively constant. Indeed, with four million people requiringassistance, humanitarian needs are in line with those identifiedin <strong>the</strong> <strong>2012</strong> HWP. This includes large numbers <strong>of</strong> peoplein desperate need in South Kord<strong>of</strong>an and Blue Nile. However,access restrictions prevent a comprehensive assessment andresponse in <strong>the</strong>se areas.While needs remain relatively high, <strong>the</strong> reduced funding <strong>for</strong><strong>Sudan</strong> comes at a time when <strong>the</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sudan</strong> isfacing economic uncertainty and may not have <strong>the</strong> meansto provide significant investments in <strong>the</strong> services that couldaddress human suffering. The reduction in funding has anumber <strong>of</strong> explanations including:• Donor fatigue with <strong>the</strong> protracted crisis in <strong>Sudan</strong> – <strong>the</strong>Darfur crisis being in its ninth year;• Restrictions on access to people in need, preventingagencies reaching people affected by conflict in Darfurand <strong>the</strong> border areas;• Restrictions on movement <strong>of</strong> aid agencies and donors,making it difficult <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>m to carry out essential monitoringand evaluation (M&E); and• The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sudan</strong>’s policy <strong>of</strong> allowing onlynational organisations or Government agencies to haveaccess to populations in need, particularly in SouthKord<strong>of</strong>an and Blue Nile, in spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir limited technicaland logistical capacities.• Recession or severely strained economies in most donornations.The CHFThe CHF represents a critical channel <strong>of</strong> funding <strong>for</strong> humanitarianorganizations. In <strong>2012</strong>, <strong>the</strong> CHF has allocated $70 million toaddress <strong>the</strong> most urgent humanitarian needs and critical gapsand currently has seven million dollars set aside in reserve <strong>for</strong>sudden onset emergency needs. This CHF funding representsalmost 15.5% <strong>of</strong> all humanitarian funding <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sudan</strong> receivedso far. The fund is a multi-donor pooled fund used to support<strong>the</strong> timely allocation and disbursement <strong>of</strong> donor resourcesunder <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Humanitarian Coordinator (HC).Much ef<strong>for</strong>t has been put into building capacity <strong>of</strong> NNGOsand institutions through INGOs and <strong>the</strong> CHF. Indeed, in <strong>2012</strong><strong>the</strong> CHF will have allocated $6.5 million dollars in direct fundsto national organizations or 9% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> standard allocation thusfar. This does not include funds passed through internationalorganizations to national organizations as implementing partners.<strong>2012</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> funding by sector as <strong>of</strong> 30 Jun <strong>2012</strong> (in $m)Sector Rev. needs $m Funding $m Fundedem%afàbhjEEkBI 15.41 2.68 18%CCS 60.10 21.97 39%EDU 80.06 31.86 41%FSL 430.80 268.79 60%H 80.86 23.47 29%MA 16.10 4.05 25%NFI/ES 35.81 5.17 14%NUT 52.69 19.43 38%PRO 73.22 11.17 15%REF 86.87 9.01 10%RER 26.47 8.45 32%WASH 94.23 14.11 15%Not specified - 37.78Total 1,052.69 457.99 43%<strong>2012</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> funding by priorityPriority Rev needs $m Funding $m FundedHigh 760.76 358.92 43%Medium 291.93 61.28 27%Not specified - 37.78 -Total 1,052.69 457.99 43%CERF AND CHF IN <strong>2012</strong>CERF allocations per agency in <strong>2012</strong> (mid-year)Amounts allocated ($ million)2.7CHF allocations per sector in <strong>2012</strong>Amounts allocated ($ million)9.110.99.9∑ $70.89 million0.8Kosti,White Nile$3.58m6.94.85.95.22.85.17.31.11.4WFPIOMBICSC EDU FSL H MA NFI/ES NUT PRO REF RER WASH

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!