11.07.2015 Views

Orthopedic Trauma in Pregnancy - The Journal of Family Practice

Orthopedic Trauma in Pregnancy - The Journal of Family Practice

Orthopedic Trauma in Pregnancy - The Journal of Family Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P. Desai and M. SukABFigure 3. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) postoperativex-rays.Figure 1. Ultrasound at 24-week <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e pregnancy.AFigure 2. Lateral (A) and anteroposterior (B) x-rays <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury.Bdependent. In addition, the most critical and vulnerable period<strong>in</strong> utero for central nervous system damage is 8 to 15 weeks<strong>of</strong> gestation. However, <strong>in</strong> a recent review <strong>of</strong> the literature,De Santis and colleagues 3 found that, though ioniz<strong>in</strong>g radiationrepresents a possible teratogen to the fetus, “<strong>in</strong>advertentexposure[s] from diagnostic procedures <strong>in</strong> pregnancy … donot <strong>in</strong> most cases <strong>in</strong>crease the natural risk <strong>of</strong> congenital anomalies.”Furthermore, they recommended that, if a maternal<strong>in</strong>dication for radiologic imag<strong>in</strong>g exists, and the <strong>in</strong>formationcannot be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by other methods, the physician shouldnot hesitate to order such studies. <strong>The</strong> only caveat they <strong>of</strong>feredwas that maternal thyroid gland exposure to diagnostic radiationwas associated with slight decreases <strong>in</strong> birth weight.Physicians’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> teratogenic risk associatedwith radiation exposure <strong>in</strong> early pregnancy were recentlystudied. 4 Four hundred family physicians and 100 obstetricianswere asked about their perceptions <strong>of</strong> risk to <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>gassociated with any abdom<strong>in</strong>al pla<strong>in</strong> x-ray or computedtomography (CT) scan. Although subjects were <strong>in</strong>formed<strong>of</strong> the basel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 1% to 3% risk <strong>of</strong> major malformations <strong>in</strong>any pregnancy, results proved that the perceived risks wereunrealistically high and warranted education <strong>of</strong> the medicalcommunity. Forty-four percent <strong>of</strong> family physicians and11% <strong>of</strong> obstetricians estimated the risk to be higher than5% with abdom<strong>in</strong>al x-ray, and 61% <strong>of</strong> family physiciansand 34% <strong>of</strong> obstetricians estimated the risk to be higher than5% with abdom<strong>in</strong>al CT. Undoubtedly, such misperceptionscan lead to <strong>in</strong>creased maternal anxiety and <strong>in</strong>correct recommendationsto term<strong>in</strong>ate pregnancy. <strong>The</strong> American College <strong>of</strong>Obstetricians and Gynecologists 5 provided guidel<strong>in</strong>es for x-ray exam<strong>in</strong>ations or exposure dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy (Table I).Imag<strong>in</strong>g Guidel<strong>in</strong>esUnits generally used to measure the effects <strong>of</strong> x-ray <strong>in</strong>cluderad, roentgen equivalents man (rem), gray (Gy), and sievert(Sv). In the literature, any <strong>of</strong> these units may be used, and itis therefore important to understand their conversions. Forthe purpose <strong>of</strong> diagnostic x-rays, 1 Gy = 1 Sv = 100 rad =100 rem. Fetal risks <strong>of</strong> growth restriction, anomalies, andabortions are not <strong>in</strong>creased with ioniz<strong>in</strong>g radiation exposures<strong>of</strong> less than 5 rad. 5 Growth retardation, microcephaly,and mental retardation are observable at exposures higherthan 50 rad. 6 Putt<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong> perspective <strong>in</strong>volves be<strong>in</strong>gaware <strong>of</strong> the estimated fetal exposure from common radiologicprocedures 5 (Table II).Pla<strong>in</strong> x-rays generally result <strong>in</strong> fetal exposures <strong>in</strong> the milliradrange. Moreover, x-rays <strong>of</strong> extremities (ie, humerus,forearm, tibia) allow placement <strong>of</strong> a lead apron over thepatent to further m<strong>in</strong>imize exposure doses. Exposure fromCT depends on slice thickness and therefore the number <strong>of</strong>necessary cuts. Spiral CT has the added dimension <strong>of</strong> pitch,but, with customary use <strong>of</strong> pitch higher than or equal to 1,the exposure dose <strong>of</strong> conventional and spiral CT is the same.It was recently reported that exposure from CT is 1.5 rad butcan be reduced to as little as 250 millirad. 7November 2007 E161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!