P. Desai and M. Sukoperative treatment <strong>of</strong> a female 24 weeks pregnant with acomm<strong>in</strong>uted transverse and posterior wall acetabular fracture.<strong>The</strong> patient suffered no adverse outcomes to the fetus,delivered vag<strong>in</strong>ally at 39 weeks, and was weight-bear<strong>in</strong>g 12weeks after surgery. However, the authors stated, “Whilewe would not recommend that all pregnant patients withacetabular fractures should undergo open reduction <strong>in</strong>ternalfixation, it is an option … that should be <strong>of</strong>fered.” Kloenand colleagues 20 also reported that complex acetabularfractures can be treated operatively and uneventfully andresult <strong>in</strong> vag<strong>in</strong>al childbirth.In general, all patients should be counseled about therisks and benefits <strong>of</strong> their surgery. However, <strong>in</strong> pregnantpatients, additional considerations apply.In a retrospective follow-up <strong>of</strong> 7 patients with pelvicfractures <strong>in</strong> pregnancy, Pape and colleagues 37 found that 2<strong>of</strong> 3 mothers with surviv<strong>in</strong>g fetuses had modifications tothe treatment <strong>of</strong> their pelvic <strong>in</strong>juries <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> fetalwell-be<strong>in</strong>g. One patient with an anterior column posteriorhemitransverse fracture pattern was not eligible for surgerybecause <strong>of</strong> coagulopathy <strong>in</strong>duced by amniotic fluid. Shewas treated nonoperatively and went on to uneventful heal<strong>in</strong>gand full weight-bear<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> second patient had multipleorthopedic <strong>in</strong>juries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g unilateral zone 2 sacrumfractures and ipsilateral anterior pelvic r<strong>in</strong>g fractures. Sheunderwent operative treatment <strong>of</strong> bilateral open femur fractures,and the pelvic r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>jury was treated with an externalfixator because <strong>of</strong> concerns about excessive ioniz<strong>in</strong>g radiation.Last, Leggon and colleagues 38 reviewed the literatureon pelvic and acetabular fractures (N = 101), found thatthese <strong>in</strong>juries were associated with a higher mortality rateamong fetuses (35%) than mothers (9%), and concludedthat mechanism <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury and <strong>in</strong>jury severity <strong>in</strong>fluencedmortality, whereas fracture classification, fracture type,pregnancy trimester, and era <strong>of</strong> reviewed literature did notcorrelate with mortality.Clearly, there are multiple approaches to treat<strong>in</strong>g a pregnantpatient. Care must be taken to evaluate the well-be<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> the mother and the fetus to optimize outcomes. Whetherto provide operative versus nonoperative treatment <strong>of</strong>pelvic and acetabular fractures appears to h<strong>in</strong>ge more on<strong>in</strong>jury severity and patient stability than on the nature <strong>of</strong> theorthopedic <strong>in</strong>jury itself. Loegters and colleagues 39 stated,“Surgical treatment <strong>of</strong> an unstable fracture <strong>of</strong> the pelvicr<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy is possible with a justifiable risk tothe mother and child.” We add that surgical treatment <strong>of</strong>these <strong>in</strong>juries is a reasonable option for pregnant patientsto allow for anatomical reduction and <strong>in</strong>creased heal<strong>in</strong>gpotential while keep<strong>in</strong>g term vag<strong>in</strong>al delivery as an option.ConclusionsTreatment <strong>of</strong> the pregnant orthopedic trauma patient generatesmany questions and raises many uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> management.After review<strong>in</strong>g much <strong>of</strong> the up-to-date literature,we can recommend a safe approach to orthopedic surgery<strong>in</strong> the pregnant patient with confidence.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, there is m<strong>in</strong>imal radiation risk<strong>in</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g x-rays for operative plann<strong>in</strong>g, provided thatthe cumulative dose is with<strong>in</strong> 5 rad. Also, safety concernsregard<strong>in</strong>g patient position<strong>in</strong>g and staff radiation exposureshould be taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration.In addition, we found that most anesthetics <strong>in</strong> pregnancyare category C and therefore safe. Perioperative opioiduse for pa<strong>in</strong> management is recommended with little risk.LMWH and fondapar<strong>in</strong>ux are the safest choices for anticoagulation.Last, pregnancy is not a contra<strong>in</strong>dication tooperative management <strong>of</strong> pelvic and acetabular fractures.It is clear that educat<strong>in</strong>g the medical community as wellas the patient about the potential risks and misconceptionsregard<strong>in</strong>g surgery <strong>in</strong> pregnancy will decrease the uncerta<strong>in</strong>tyand anxiety surround<strong>in</strong>g this patient population.Authors’ Disclosure Statement<strong>The</strong> authors report no actual or potential conflict <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong> relation to this article.References1. Heckman JD, Sassard R. Current concepts review: musculoskeletal considerations<strong>in</strong> pregnancy. J Bone Jo<strong>in</strong>t Surg Am. 1994;76(11):1720-1730.2. Ritchie JR. Orthopaedic considerations dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy. Cl<strong>in</strong> ObstetGynecol. 2003;46(2):456-466.3. De Santis M, Di Gianantonio E, Straface G, et al. Ioniz<strong>in</strong>g radiations <strong>in</strong>pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review <strong>of</strong> literature. Reprod Toxicol.2005;20(3):323-329.4. Savithiri R, Bona N, Chandra K, Koren G. Physicians’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> teratogenicrisk associated with radiography and CT dur<strong>in</strong>g early pregnancy. AJRAm J Roentgenol. 2004;182(5):1107-1109.5. ACOG Committee on Obstetric <strong>Practice</strong>. ACOG Committee Op<strong>in</strong>ion.Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995).Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for diagnostic imag<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol.2004;104(3):647-651.6. Brent RL. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> embryonic and fetal exposure to x-ray, microwaves,and ultrasound. Cl<strong>in</strong> Per<strong>in</strong>atol. 1986;13(3):615-648.7. Parry RA, Glaze SA, Archer BR. <strong>The</strong> AAPM/RSNA physics tutorialfor residents. Typical patient radiation doses <strong>in</strong> diagnostic radiology.Radiographics. 1999;19(5):1289-1302.8. De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL. A review <strong>of</strong> the current use <strong>of</strong> magneticresonance imag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. ProgBiophys Mol Biol. 2005;87(2-3):335-353.9. Burrow G, Hamilton H, Hrubec Z, et al. Study <strong>of</strong> adolescents exposed <strong>in</strong>utero to the atomic bomb, Nagasaki, Japan. I. General aspects: cl<strong>in</strong>icallaboratory data. Yale J Biol Med. 1964;36:430-444.10. Hosh<strong>in</strong>o T, Itoga T, Kato H. Leukemia <strong>in</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> parents exposed tothe atomic bomb at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Paper presented at: Meet<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> the Japanese Association <strong>of</strong> Hematology; March 28-30, 1965.11. Naumburg E, Bellocco R, Cnatt<strong>in</strong>gius S, Hall P, Boice JD Jr, Ekbom A.Intrauter<strong>in</strong>e exposure to diagnostic x-rays and risk <strong>of</strong> childhood leukemiasubtypes. Radiat Res. 2001;156(6):718-723.12. Ohtaki K, Kodama Y, Nakano M, et al. Human fetuses do not registerchromosome damage <strong>in</strong>flicted by radiation exposure <strong>in</strong> lymphoid precursorcells except for a small but significant effect at low doses. Radiat Res.2004;161(4):373-379.13. Statkiewicz Shearer MA. Radiation Protection <strong>in</strong> Medical Radiography. St.Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002.14. <strong>The</strong>ocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Peris<strong>in</strong>akis K, Papadokostakis G,Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Image-guided reconstruction <strong>of</strong> femoralfractures: is the staff progeny safe? Cl<strong>in</strong> Orthop. 2005;(430):182-188.15. Kuczkowski K. Nonobstetric surgery dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy: what are the risks<strong>of</strong> anesthesia? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;59(1):52-56.16. Hart MA. Help! My orthopaedic patient is pregnant! Orthop Nurs.2005;24(2):108-114.17. Melnick DM, Wahl W, Dalton VK. Management <strong>of</strong> general surgical problems<strong>in</strong> the pregnant patient. Am J Surg. 2004;187(2):170-180.18. Mazze R, Kallen B. Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operationdur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy: a registry study <strong>of</strong> 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1989;161(5):1178-1185.November 2007 E161 E165
<strong>Orthopedic</strong> <strong>Trauma</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pregnancy</strong>19. Rosen MA. Management <strong>of</strong> anesthesia for the pregnant surgical patient.Anesthesiology. 1999;91(4):1159-1163.20. Kloen P, Flik K, Helfet DL. Operative treatment <strong>of</strong> acetabular fracture dur<strong>in</strong>gpregnancy: a case report. Arch Orthop <strong>Trauma</strong> Surg. 2005;125(3):209-212.21. Goodman S. Anesthesia for nonobstetric surgery <strong>in</strong> the pregnant patient.Sem<strong>in</strong> Per<strong>in</strong>atol. 2002;26(2):136-145.22. Horrigan TJ, Villarreal R, We<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> L. Are obstetrical personnel requiredfor <strong>in</strong>traoperative fetal monitor<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g nonobstetric surgery? J Per<strong>in</strong>atol.1999;19(2):124-126.23. Bricker L, Lavender T. Parenteral opioids for labor pa<strong>in</strong> relief: a systemicreview. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 suppl):S94-S109.24. White RH. <strong>The</strong> epidemiology <strong>of</strong> venous thromboembolism. Circulation.2003;107(suppl I):I4-I8.25. Doyle NM, Monga M. Thromboembolic disease <strong>in</strong> pregnancy. ObstetGynecol Cl<strong>in</strong> North Am. 2004;31(2):319-344.26. Greer IA. <strong>The</strong> challenge <strong>of</strong> thrombophilia <strong>in</strong> maternal–fetal medic<strong>in</strong>e. N EnglJ Med. 2000;342(6):424-425.27. Robertson L, Greer I. Thromboembolism <strong>in</strong> pregnancy. Curr Op<strong>in</strong> ObstetGynecol. 2005;17(2):113-116.28. McRae SJ, G<strong>in</strong>sberg JS. Initial treatment <strong>of</strong> venous thromboembolism.Circulation. 2004;110(suppl I):I3-I9.29. Niccolai CS, Hicks RW, Oertel L, Francis JL; Hepar<strong>in</strong> Consensus Group.Unfractionated hepar<strong>in</strong>: focus on high-alert drug. Pharmacotherapy.2004;24(8 pt 2):146S-155S.30. Hawk<strong>in</strong>s D, Evans J. M<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g the risk <strong>of</strong> hepar<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced osteoporosisdur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy. Expert Op<strong>in</strong> Drug Saf. 2005;4(3):583-590.31. G<strong>in</strong>sberg JS, Bates SM. Management <strong>of</strong> venous thromboembolism dur<strong>in</strong>gpregnancy. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1(7):1435-1442.32. Kawamata K, Chiba Y, Tanaka R, Higashi M, Nishigami K. Experience <strong>of</strong>temporary <strong>in</strong>ferior vena cava filters <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong> the per<strong>in</strong>atal period to preventpulmonary embolism <strong>in</strong> pregnant women with deep ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosis. J VascSurg. 2005;41(4):652-656.33. Golan A, Sandbank O, Teare AJ. <strong>Trauma</strong> <strong>in</strong> late pregnancy. S Afr Med J.1980;57(5):161-165.34. Pals SD, Brown CW, Friermood TG. Open reduction <strong>in</strong>ternal fixation <strong>of</strong> anacetabular fracture dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy. J Orthop <strong>Trauma</strong>. 1992;6(3):379-381.35. Yosipovitch Z, Goldberg I, Ventura E, Neri A. Open reduction <strong>of</strong> acetabularfracture <strong>in</strong> pregnancy. A case report. Cl<strong>in</strong> Orthop. 1992;(282):229-232.36. Dunlop DJ, McCahill JP, Blakemore ME. Internal fixation <strong>of</strong> an acetabularfracture dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy. Injury. 1997;28(7):481-482.37. Pape, HC, Pohlemann T, Gansslen A, et al. Pelvic fractures <strong>in</strong> pregnantmultiple trauma patients. J Orthop <strong>Trauma</strong>. 2000;14(4):238-244.38. Leggon RE, Wood GS, Indeck MC. Pelvic fractures <strong>in</strong> pregnancy: factors<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g maternal and fetal outcomes. J <strong>Trauma</strong>. 2002;53(4):796-804.39. Loegters T, Briem D, Gatzka C, et al. Treatment <strong>of</strong> unstable fractures<strong>of</strong> the pelvic r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> pregnancy. Arch Orthop <strong>Trauma</strong> Surg.2005;125(3):204-208.This paper will be judged for the Resident Writer’s Award.E166 E162 <strong>The</strong> American <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Orthopedic</strong>s ®