22Responses to Environmental and Societal Challenges for our Unstable Earth (RESCUE)Examples of interdisciplinaryeducation and learning initiatives(non-exhaustive list)Interdisciplinary schools and initiatives establishedto promote education for sustainabilityinclude:The Institute of Human-Environment Systemsat the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,Zurich, Switzerland; the ETH SustainabilityNetwork, Zurich, Switzerland; the OsloSustainability Initiative at the Universityof Oslo, Norway; the Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Sweden; the ‘Strategic Leadershiptowards Sustainability’ International MSc programmeat BTH, Sweden; the STEPS Centreat the University of Sussex, Brighton, UK;the Cambridge Sustainability PractitionerProgramme and its Cambridge SustainabilityNetwork, UK; the International ResearchInstitute in Sustainability at the University ofGloucestershire, Cheltenham, UK; the Institutefor Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam,Germany; the German Social EcologicalResearch (SÖF) Programme; the InternationalCenter for Transdisciplinary Research inFrance; the Université Interdisciplinaire deParis, France; the BABEL – ‘Construire lesnotions-clés du développement durable’ seminars,Reims, France; the INRIA SustainabilityTransition, Environment, Economy and localPolicy research network, France; the ‘Dossierset Débats pour le Développement Durable’ association,France; the Doctoral School SustainableDevelopment at the University of NaturalResources and Life <strong>Science</strong>s, Vienna, Austria;the Centre of Transdisciplinary Cognitive andState-System <strong>Science</strong>s, Austria; the ResearchInstitute for Managing Sustainability, ViennaUniversity of Economics and Business,Austria; the newly formed <strong>European</strong> Networkfor Environmental Ethics; the School forSustainability at the Arizona State University,USA; the Institute for Sustainable Solutions atthe Portland State University, USA; the Institutefor Resources, Environment and Sustainabilityat the University of British Columbia, Canada;the ‘Social and Ecological Sustainability’ PhDprogramme, University of Waterloo, Canada;the Transdisciplinary Doctoral Programmefocusing on Complexity and SustainabilityStudies ‘TsamaHUB’ in Stellenbosch University,South Africa.beliefs, habits and loyalties (Hoffman and Barstow,2007; Reid et al., 2008; Heifetz et al., 2009; Keganand Lahey, 2009; Jones et al., 2010).Many institutions of higher education havealready responded to the call for more interdisciplinaryresearch (see examples in box). Interdisciplinaryresearch programmes have been fostered by theinternational global change research communityof the International Council for <strong>Science</strong>s (ICSU)and capacity building for the international globalchange research community by, e.g., the GlobalChange System for Analysis, Research and Training(START)23 organisation. But reforms have beenrelatively slow, and in some cases even counter-productive.For example, many of the initiatives consistof ‘clip together’ course offerings that do not includea coherent framework for understanding complexprocesses of social-ecological systems, includingdeeper issues linked to psychology, consciousness/cognitive studies, cultural studies, religious studiesand so on. The fact that much has been tried, withless than satisfactory results, suggests that it may benecessary to seek answers outside of the traditionalresponses and institutions. In other words, innovativeapproaches to solving persistent problems areneeded.Often the repeated calls for more interdisciplinaryglobal environmental change research, newframings of environmental and societal problems,more stakeholder participation and so on representa continuous revolution around an unchanging andeven unrecognised or invisible axis. This axis, onecould argue, represents a core set of unquestionedassumptions that lead to only small and step-wisechanges (including a few new models of good practicein interdisciplinary research on sustainability).Drawing on this image of revolution, it appears thatthe majority of existing approaches to education areprimarily spinning on an unquestioned and invisibleaxis. Most approaches treat the challenge for educationand capacity building as a technical problemthat requires adjustments in current practices. Tomove beyond this particular type of circular revolution,it may be necessary to identify an alternativeapproach, i.e., changing the axis by questioning currentbeliefs and assumptions regarding the deliveryof education.Significantly, RESCUE recognises that “[t]hedualism of nature and culture […] both obstructsour understanding of what is global change andweakens our ability to address those challenges”(RESCUE, 2009). This dualistic worldview thatseparates humans and environment represents the23. www.start.org
Good Practice Example: Barefoot College in Rajasthan, IndiaLocation: IndiaMain actors involved: A collective of urban educatedpersons and professionals registered asSocial Work and Research Centre, rural communitiesTime frame: Established in 1972Description: This is an example of new initiativeson South-South learning using different languages,including art and non-scientific jargonnow emerging in the field of sustainability. Inthe Barefoot College in Rajasthan, India, illiteratewomen learn about the use of solar technologyand then share their knowledge with otherilliterate women.The challenges of dealing with persistent problemsof unsustainability require a new, open knowledgesystem. This means, as discussed throughout thisreport, integrative research, integration of knowledge,increased public awareness and interest,collective problem framing, plurality of perspecontologicalbasis for modernity and positivist science(e.g., Castree, 2005). The questions are: whatkind of capacity is necessary to move beyond thisdualism? What kind of education is needed to play arole in building this capacity and changing the waythat problems are understood and addressed? Thepredominant approaches to the problems discussedabove often fall prey to this dualism, and this observationdrives us to look for the roots underlying suchapproaches. Bohm (1992) pursued such an inquiryand found incoherence in perceptions and the fragmentationof thought to be at the heart of such issues.There is clearly a need for a comprehensive andstrategic approach to capacity building to addresscomplex global change problems (e.g., Leemans etal., 2009). The key challenges for research identifiedthrough the ICSU visioning processes andBelmont forum will require an enhanced researchand education capacity to address them throughinterdisciplinary research (Reid et al., 2010; ICSU,2010b; IGFA, 2011; KLSC, 2011).University education systems have been themain channel for developing and disseminatingunderstanding of global environmental change. Yetthese systems are undergoing enormous changesin response to social, economic and technologicalchanges. For example, “[t]eacherless or virtualteacherlearning is described by enthusiasts as aIn the meantime, Barefoot College’s philosophyhas spread over a network that has grownorganically throughout India and even Africa.The women at Barefoot College learn how tosolve their everyday problems in a sustainableway and strive for a more balanced society. It isfunded through grants and donations receivedfrom the Government of India, internationalfunding agencies as well as private foundations,and through income generated through ownsources.More information: www.barefootcollege.org;vooruit.be/en/page/1491;thoughtsandtalks.so-on.berevolution in the making” (Giridharadas, 2009).The high levels of specialisation and the division oflabour promoted by the industrial revolution haveled to reductionist understandings and actions byindividuals and organisations. Different types ofreforms have been proposed and tested (see, e.g.,Corcoran and Wals, 2004). However, it has beenargued that:“sustainability does not simply require an ‘add-on’to existing structures and curricula, but impliesa change of fundamental epistemology in our cultureand hence also in our educational thinkingand practice. Seen in this light, sustainability is notjust another issue to be added to an overcrowdedcurriculum, but a gateway to a different view of curriculum,of pedagogy, or organizational change, ofpolicy and particularly of ethos.”(Sterling, 2004, p. 50).Necessary institutional change23Responses to Environmental and Societal Challenges for our Unstable Earth (RESCUE)