References58Responses to Environmental and Societal Challenges for our Unstable Earth (RESCUE)Smith, A. and Stirling A. (2007). Moving Outside or Inside?Objectification and Reflexivity in the Governance of Socio-Technical Systems. Journal of Environmental Policy &Planning 9(3-4), 351-373.Spangenberg, J.H. (2011). Sustainability science: a review,an analysis and some empirical lessons. EnvironmentalConservation 38(3), 275-287.Sprinz, D.F. (2009). Long-Term Environmental Policy:Definition, Knowledge, Future Research. GlobalEnvironmental Politics 9(3), 1-8.Steffen, W. et al. (2004). Global Change and the EarthSystem: A Planet Under Pressure. Springer.Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. and McNeill, J. (2011).The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical changes.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 369, 842-867.Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable Education: Re-visioningLearning and Change. Schumacher Briefings 6. Bristol:Green Books.Sterling, S. (2004). Higher Education, Sustainability, andthe Role of Systemic Learning. In: Higher Education andthe Challenges of Sustainability: Problematics, Promiseand Practice, P.B. Corcoran and A. E. J. Wals (eds).The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilientlearner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigmof sustainable education. Environmental Education Research(Special Issue, Resilience in social-ecological systems: The roleof learning and education) 16, 511–528.Stern, P.C, Young, O.R and Druckman, D. (1992).Global environmental change: Understanding the humandimensions. National Academies Press.Stibbe, A. (2009). Handbook of Sustainability Literacy: skillsfor a changing world. Green Books. 224 pages + electroniceditions: www.sustainability-literacy.org and arts.brighton.ac.uk/stibbe-handbook-of-sustainabilityTàbara, J.D. (2005). Defining systems of interest forIntegrated Sustainability Assessment. In: Sustainability:a systemic synthesis from the perspective of IntegratedSustainability Assessment, P.M. Weaver, J.D. Tàbara, J.Rotmans, A. Haxeltine and J. Jäger (eds). Section 4. Matisseproject: Deliverable D1.1. www.matisse-project.netTickell, C. (2011). Societal responses to the Anthropocene.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 369, 926-932.Turnpenny, J., Jones, M. and Lorenzoni, I. (2011). WhereNow for Post-Normal <strong>Science</strong>? A Critical Review of itsDevelopment, Definitions, and Uses. <strong>Science</strong>, Technology &Human Values 36, 287-306.US-GCRP Program. (2003). Strategic Plan for the ClimateChange <strong>Science</strong> Program. www.climatescience.gov/Library/stratplan2003/final/ccspstratplan2003-all.pdfvan der Sluijs, J.P. (2006). Uncertainty, assumptions, andvalue commitments in the knowledge-base of complexenvironmental problems. In: Interfaces between <strong>Science</strong> andSociety, Â. Guimarães Pereira, S. Guedes Vaz and S. Tognetti(eds). GreenLeaf Publishing. p.67-84.van der Sluijs, J.P. (2010). Uncertainty and complexity:the need for new ways of interfacing climate science andclimate policy. In: From Climate Change to Social Change:Perspectives on <strong>Science</strong> - Policy Interactions, P. Driessen, P.Leroy and W. van Vierssen (eds). Utrecht: InternationalBooks. p.31-49.van der Sluijs, J.P. et al. (2005). Combining Quantitativeand Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model basedEnvironmental Assessment: the NUSAP System. RiskAnalysis 25 (2), 481-492.van Kerkhoff, L. and Szlezák, N.A. (2010). The role ofinnovative global institutions in linking knowledge andaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of <strong>Science</strong>s.Early Edition 1 March. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0900541107.Victor, D.G. et al. (2009). The Geoengineering Option: ALast Resort Against Global Warming? Foreign Affairs 88(2),64-76.Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D. and Kemp, R. (2006). ReflexiveGovernance for Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar.480p. ISBN 1-84542-582-0.Walker, B. and Salt, D. (2006). Resilience Thinking:Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World.Island Press. 192p. ISBN 1-59726-093-2.WDC (2007). World Data Centers - Status and Prioritiesfor the Future. 19p. wds.geolinks.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/2007-07-wdc-report-to-scid.pdfTàbara, J.D. et al. (2005). Sustainability Learning for RiverBasin Management and Planning in Europe. HarmoniCOPIntegration <strong>Report</strong>. www.harmonicop.uos.de/download.phpTàbara, J.D. and Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). SustainabilityLearning in Natural Resource Use and Management.Ecology and Society 12 (2), 3. www.ecologyandsociety.org/viewissue.php?sf=28Wickson, F., Carew, A.L. and Russell, A.W. (2006).Transdisciplinary Research: Characteristics, Quandariesand Quality. Futures 38, 1046-1059.Wilkinson, A. and Eidinow, E. (2008). Evolving practices inenvironmental scenarios: a new scenario typology. Environ.Res. Lett. 3, 045017, 11p. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045017
ReferencesWinowiecki, L. et al. (2011). Tools for enhancinginterdisciplinary communication. Sustainability: <strong>Science</strong>,Practice, & Policy 7(1), 74-80.Young, O.R. (2008). Building Regimes for Socio-ecologicalSystems: Institutional Diagnostics. In: Institutions andEnvironmental Change, O.R. Young, L. King and H.Schroeder (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press. p. 115-144.Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W. and Crutzen,P. (2010). The New World of the Anthropocene.Environmental <strong>Science</strong> & Technology 44, 2228-2231.Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Haywood, A. and Ellis,M. (2011). The Anthropocene: a new epoch of geologicaltime? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:Mathematical, Physical and Engineering <strong>Science</strong>s 369,835-841.59Ziegler, R. and Ott, K. (2011). The quality of sustainabilityscience: a philosophical perspective. Sustainability: <strong>Science</strong>,Practice, & Policy 7(1), 31-44.Zierhofer, W. and Burger, P. (2007). DisentanglingTransdisciplinarity: An Analysis of Knowledge Integrationin Problem-Oriented Research. <strong>Science</strong> Studies 20(1), 51-74.Responses to Environmental and Societal Challenges for our Unstable Earth (RESCUE)
Change language