Quantity implicatures
Quantity implicatures
Quantity implicatures
SHOW LESS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Weak <strong>implicatures</strong> aren’t always strenghtened(4) Bonnie had an apple or a pear.Implicatures:(5) a. ¬Bel S (Bonnie had an apple)b. ¬Bel S (Bonnie had an pear)But since the Bivalence Assumption doesn’t hold in this case(why not?), we don’t get:(6) a. Bel S ¬(Bonnie had an apple)b. Bel S ¬(Bonnie had an pear)<strong>Quantity</strong> <strong>implicatures</strong>
Change language