PLJ volume 37 number 1 -01- Deogracias Eufemio
PLJ volume 37 number 1 -01- Deogracias Eufemio
PLJ volume 37 number 1 -01- Deogracias Eufemio
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
uy a portion of land (6,000 sq. m.) belonging to La Orden de PP.<br />
Benedictinos, a domestic religious corporation that owns the San<br />
Beda College, a private educational institution. Having failed to<br />
reach an agreement with the owner, the Government instituted expropriation<br />
proceedings. The religious corporation filed a motion<br />
to dismiss on the grounds that the property sought to be expropriated<br />
is already dedicated to public use, and that there is no necessity<br />
for the proposed expropriation. Without receiving evidence upon the<br />
questions of fact arising from the complaint, the motion to dismiss<br />
and the opposition filed thereto, the trial court issued the appealed<br />
order dismissing the case, upon the ground that such expropriation<br />
was not of extreme necessity.<br />
The Supreme Court set aside the order of dismissal and remanded<br />
the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The<br />
Court re-emphasizedthat "the courts have the power to inquire into<br />
the legality of the exercise of the right of eminent domain and to<br />
determine whether or not there is a genuine necessity therefor."<br />
According to the Court: "whether or not the proposed opening of<br />
Azcarraga extension is a necessity in order to relieve the daily congestion<br />
of traffic on Legarda St. is a question Of fact dependent not<br />
only upon the facts of which the trial court very liberally took judicial<br />
notice but also upon other factors that do not appear of record<br />
and must, therefore, be established by means of evidence." Hence,<br />
the parties should have been given an opportunity to present their<br />
respective evidence upon these factors and others that might be of<br />
direct or indirect help in determining the vital question of fact involved<br />
herein.<br />
B. Expropriation .<strong>01</strong> lands to ·be subdivided int() small lots.<br />
Consecrated in our Constitution is the principle that "the promotion<br />
of social justice to insure the well-being and economic security<br />
of all the people should be the concern of the State." 121 In<br />
line with this beneficient principle, the Constitution expressly provides<br />
that "Congress of the Philippines may authorize, upon payment<br />
of just compensation, the expropriation of lands to be subdivided<br />
into small lots and conveyed at cost to individuals." 128<br />
1. Under Com.Act No. 539. 129<br />
Com. Act No. 539 provides:<br />
"SECTION 1. The President of the Philippines is authorized to acquire<br />
private lands or any iJll1:erestherein, through purchase or expropriation,<br />
U'I PHIL. CONST. Art. II. sec. 6.<br />
"" PHIL. CONST. Art. XIII. sec. 4.<br />
••• Approved. May 26. 1940.