26.11.2012 Views

PLJ volume 37 number 1 -01- Deogracias Eufemio

PLJ volume 37 number 1 -01- Deogracias Eufemio

PLJ volume 37 number 1 -01- Deogracias Eufemio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

uy a portion of land (6,000 sq. m.) belonging to La Orden de PP.<br />

Benedictinos, a domestic religious corporation that owns the San<br />

Beda College, a private educational institution. Having failed to<br />

reach an agreement with the owner, the Government instituted expropriation<br />

proceedings. The religious corporation filed a motion<br />

to dismiss on the grounds that the property sought to be expropriated<br />

is already dedicated to public use, and that there is no necessity<br />

for the proposed expropriation. Without receiving evidence upon the<br />

questions of fact arising from the complaint, the motion to dismiss<br />

and the opposition filed thereto, the trial court issued the appealed<br />

order dismissing the case, upon the ground that such expropriation<br />

was not of extreme necessity.<br />

The Supreme Court set aside the order of dismissal and remanded<br />

the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The<br />

Court re-emphasizedthat "the courts have the power to inquire into<br />

the legality of the exercise of the right of eminent domain and to<br />

determine whether or not there is a genuine necessity therefor."<br />

According to the Court: "whether or not the proposed opening of<br />

Azcarraga extension is a necessity in order to relieve the daily congestion<br />

of traffic on Legarda St. is a question Of fact dependent not<br />

only upon the facts of which the trial court very liberally took judicial<br />

notice but also upon other factors that do not appear of record<br />

and must, therefore, be established by means of evidence." Hence,<br />

the parties should have been given an opportunity to present their<br />

respective evidence upon these factors and others that might be of<br />

direct or indirect help in determining the vital question of fact involved<br />

herein.<br />

B. Expropriation .<strong>01</strong> lands to ·be subdivided int() small lots.<br />

Consecrated in our Constitution is the principle that "the promotion<br />

of social justice to insure the well-being and economic security<br />

of all the people should be the concern of the State." 121 In<br />

line with this beneficient principle, the Constitution expressly provides<br />

that "Congress of the Philippines may authorize, upon payment<br />

of just compensation, the expropriation of lands to be subdivided<br />

into small lots and conveyed at cost to individuals." 128<br />

1. Under Com.Act No. 539. 129<br />

Com. Act No. 539 provides:<br />

"SECTION 1. The President of the Philippines is authorized to acquire<br />

private lands or any iJll1:erestherein, through purchase or expropriation,<br />

U'I PHIL. CONST. Art. II. sec. 6.<br />

"" PHIL. CONST. Art. XIII. sec. 4.<br />

••• Approved. May 26. 1940.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!