11.07.2015 Views

Preface to First Edition - lib

Preface to First Edition - lib

Preface to First Edition - lib

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSIS 269Table 15.2:BCG data. Meta-analysis on BCG vaccine with thefollowing data: the number of TBC cases after avaccination with BCG (BCGTB), the <strong>to</strong>tal number ofpeople who received BCG (BCG) as well as the numberof TBC cases without vaccination (NoVaccTB)and the <strong>to</strong>tal number of people in the study withoutvaccination (NoVacc).Study BCGTB BCGVacc NoVaccTB NoVacc Latitude Year1 4 123 11 139 44 19482 6 306 29 303 55 19493 3 231 11 220 42 19604 62 13598 248 12867 52 19775 33 5069 47 5808 13 19736 180 1541 372 1451 44 19537 8 2545 10 629 19 19738 505 88391 499 88391 13 19809 29 7499 45 7277 27 196810 17 1716 65 1665 42 196111 186 50634 141 27338 18 197412 5 2498 3 2341 33 196913 27 16913 29 17854 33 197615.2 Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysisMany individual clinical trials are not large enough <strong>to</strong> answer the questionswe want <strong>to</strong> answer as reliably as we would want <strong>to</strong> answer them. Often trialsare <strong>to</strong>o small for adequate conclusions <strong>to</strong> be drawn about potentially smalladvantages of particular therapies. Advocacy of large trials is a natural response<strong>to</strong> this situation, but it is not always possible <strong>to</strong> launch very largetrials before therapies become widely accepted or rejected prematurely. Onepossible answer <strong>to</strong> this problem lies in the classical narrative review of a se<strong>to</strong>f clinical trials with an accompanying informal synthesis of evidence fromthe different studies. It is now generally recognised, however, that such reviewarticles can, unfortunately, be very misleading as a result of both the possiblebiased selection of evidence and the emphasis placed upon it by the reviewer<strong>to</strong> support his or her personal opinion.An alternative approach that has become increasingly popular in the lastdecade or so is the systematic review which has, essentially, two components:Qualitative: the description of the available trials, in terms of their relevanceand methodological strengths and weaknesses.Quantitative: a means of mathematically combining results from different© 2010 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!