SWAT Model Recalibration - Tetratech-ffx.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Beaver Lake SWAT Modeling Baseline Analysis February 12, 2009Avg Flow (10/1/1998 to 12/31/2006)Line of Equal ValueBest-Fit LineAverage Modeled Flow (cfs)8006004002000y = 0.5905x + 94.357R 2 = 0.9430 200 400 600 800Average Observed Flow (cfs)Figure 12. Annual Regression for War Eagle Creek, 1998-2006Avg Flow (10/1/1998 to 12/31/2006)Line of Equal ValueBest-Fit LineAverage Modeled Flow (cfs)5004003002001000y = 0.513x + 71.129R 2 = 0.86250 100 200 300 400 500Average Observed Flow (cfs)Figure 13. Annual Regression for Richland Creek, 1998-200618
Beaver Lake SWAT Modeling Baseline Analysis February 12, 2009Avg Flow (10/1/1998 to 12/31/2006)Line of Equal ValueBest-Fit LineAverage Modeled Flow (cfs)150010005000y = 0.5022x + 240.34R 2 = 0.92690 500 1000 1500Average Observed Flow (cfs)Figure 14. Annual Regression for White River nr Fayetteville, 1998-2006100000Observed Flow Duration (10/1/1998 to 12/31/2006 )Modeled Flow Duration (10/1/1998 to 12/31/2006 )Daily Average Flow (cfs)1000010001001010% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%Percent of Time that Flow is Equaled or ExceededFigure 15. Flow Exceedance Curves for Simulated and Observed Flows on War Eagle Creek19
Page 1 and 2: 3200 Chapel Hill-Nelson Hwy, Suite
Page 3 and 4: Beaver Lake SWAT Modeling Baseline
Page 17: Beaver Lake SWAT Modeling Baseline
Page 43: Beaver Lake SWAT Modeling Baseline

SWAT Model Recalibration - Tetratech-ffx.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?