Grout Treatment Facility Borehole Summary Report ... - Hanford Site
Grout Treatment Facility Borehole Summary Report ... - Hanford Site
Grout Treatment Facility Borehole Summary Report ... - Hanford Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
'+<br />
:.*<br />
WHC-MR-0203<br />
SURVEILLANCE DRD89036 CHECKLIST<br />
Requirement JYesJNo IN/A<br />
Are pages of the Drill Log signed and<br />
dated each day by the WelI-<strong>Site</strong> Geologist?<br />
Verify by review of the Drill Log that ^<br />
cutting samples were been taken at least<br />
every five feet. If not, does the Drill<br />
Log give an explanation why?<br />
Were hazardous chemical samples taken at<br />
Ieast every twenty feet?<br />
Is the chain-of-custody form number<br />
referenced for hazardous chemical<br />
samples?<br />
Does the Drill Log note any significant<br />
changes in ZithoZogy? Verify that a<br />
sample was collected at that depth.<br />
Are the number and type of sample<br />
collected noted on the Drill Log after<br />
the sample description?<br />
Are sample descriptions included in the<br />
Drill Log for all sampled £dentified?<br />
Was an As-Built Diagram prepared?<br />
Is the As-Built Diagram up to date and<br />
complete including:<br />
-location and type of samples? I/<br />
-geologic and hydrologic observations? V<br />
-depth labeled in feet? %/<br />
Comments<br />
Missing from 1 page.<br />
Corrected.<br />
Attachment A<br />
Page 2 of 2<br />
The 299-E25-37 Drill Log<br />
didn't indicate that a<br />
cutting sample was taken<br />
at 240'. Project records<br />
indicate that the sample<br />
was indeed taken. The<br />
iog was corrected.<br />
The 299-E25-37 Drill Log<br />
didn't indicate that a<br />
hazardous chemical sample<br />
was taken at 40' as it<br />
should have. Project<br />
records indicate a sample<br />
was taken. The<br />
discrepancv was corrected<br />
The numbers were added<br />
and the problem corrected.<br />
* Several instances were noted in which percentages used in sample descriptions<br />
did not add to 100%. This was discussed with the project manager and the<br />
inconsistencies corrected.<br />
^q,^<br />
^