26.11.2012 Views

Grout Treatment Facility Borehole Summary Report ... - Hanford Site

Grout Treatment Facility Borehole Summary Report ... - Hanford Site

Grout Treatment Facility Borehole Summary Report ... - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

'+<br />

:.*<br />

WHC-MR-0203<br />

SURVEILLANCE DRD89036 CHECKLIST<br />

Requirement JYesJNo IN/A<br />

Are pages of the Drill Log signed and<br />

dated each day by the WelI-<strong>Site</strong> Geologist?<br />

Verify by review of the Drill Log that ^<br />

cutting samples were been taken at least<br />

every five feet. If not, does the Drill<br />

Log give an explanation why?<br />

Were hazardous chemical samples taken at<br />

Ieast every twenty feet?<br />

Is the chain-of-custody form number<br />

referenced for hazardous chemical<br />

samples?<br />

Does the Drill Log note any significant<br />

changes in ZithoZogy? Verify that a<br />

sample was collected at that depth.<br />

Are the number and type of sample<br />

collected noted on the Drill Log after<br />

the sample description?<br />

Are sample descriptions included in the<br />

Drill Log for all sampled £dentified?<br />

Was an As-Built Diagram prepared?<br />

Is the As-Built Diagram up to date and<br />

complete including:<br />

-location and type of samples? I/<br />

-geologic and hydrologic observations? V<br />

-depth labeled in feet? %/<br />

Comments<br />

Missing from 1 page.<br />

Corrected.<br />

Attachment A<br />

Page 2 of 2<br />

The 299-E25-37 Drill Log<br />

didn't indicate that a<br />

cutting sample was taken<br />

at 240'. Project records<br />

indicate that the sample<br />

was indeed taken. The<br />

iog was corrected.<br />

The 299-E25-37 Drill Log<br />

didn't indicate that a<br />

hazardous chemical sample<br />

was taken at 40' as it<br />

should have. Project<br />

records indicate a sample<br />

was taken. The<br />

discrepancv was corrected<br />

The numbers were added<br />

and the problem corrected.<br />

* Several instances were noted in which percentages used in sample descriptions<br />

did not add to 100%. This was discussed with the project manager and the<br />

inconsistencies corrected.<br />

^q,^<br />

^

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!