Tourism Planning Taskforce Report - Western Australian Planning ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 4Bradley Woods,Karen Connell,David BornmannAlan BoysAustralian HotelsAssociationHotel and LeisureAdvisory Pty LtdOverview of submission, importanceof short-stay vs permanent residentialdistinction in planning systemOverview of submissionDon Ferguson,David HollandJoe White,Lino IacomellaCaravan IndustryAssociationReal Estate Institute ofWestern AustraliaOverview of submission, recommendpolicy based approach to varioustourism usesOverview of submission, need forincreased flexibility in systemNatalie Katonna,CouncillorsShire of BroomeImportance of residential componentsin regional situationsList of consultation meetings with taskforce or Taskforce Chair and individualmembers following release of draft report.Pauline TewNeil StevensIan Murchinson, Barbara WeissAdrian Fini, Darren CooperTerry PosmaTerry MartinJeremy DawkinsBoard MembersRichard Muirhead, Paolo Amaranti, David EthertonSteve PalmerCr Nick DornanBrett JacksonBill MitchellMark HohnenChris PyeKelly CassidyProf. Dominique FischerDr Jan WarnkenPeter GleedGreg HolmeMike BignellLarry HelberIan HuxleyFrank PoetaJewell HospitalityNeil Stevens ConsultingTourism InvestmentMirvac FiniGeographe PointAs Chair WAPCChair WAPCWestern Australian Tourism CommissionWestern Australian Tourism CommissionProject ProponentShire of Augusta- Margaret RiverKareelya Property GroupProject ProponentProject ProponentQuest PropertiesGriffith UniversityCurtin UniversityGold Coast UniversityKoltasz SmithPrevelly Caravan ParkBignell DevelopmentsHelber, Hastert and FeeWestshore Property GroupFreehillsTourism Planning Taskforce Report115
Appendix 5Appendix 5STRATA TITLE TOURIST ACCOMMODATION DEVELOPMENTSATTRIBUTES OF SUCCESSTourism Western Australia has been examining the effect of strata titles on tourism developments forsome time. While being supportive in principle of strata titles as a means of financing touristaccommodation developments, Tourism WA shares the concerns of many local governments and theForeign Investment Review Board of the Federal Treasury that most strata title tourism developmentscan easily be converted to residential use after the expiration of the term of the leaseback or otherarrangement, or the failure of the complex manager. Local governments are particularly conscious thatlocal government by-laws requiring a maximum stay of three months (short-stay occupation only), aretime consuming and expensive to enforce if unit owners and complex managers choose to ignore them.The following table shows the attributes that a successful strata title tourist accommodationestablishment needs to have. The consequences of the establishment not having the attributes are alsoidentified.Tourism success(A) Building design and constructionConsistent architectural and building standardsare established by the developer. In resorts wherethere are different classes of accommodation,rooms and facilities in each particular class are ofthe same standard.Survey strata and vacant lot strata developmentsshould be structured to avoid each unit beingdesigned and/or constructed by different architectsor builders, with construction comprehensivelyprogrammed over a short time period.The design of any new or redeveloped units ofaccommodation should facilitate tourism use byensuring that it meets the needs of visitors to thearea rather than have the look and feel ofresidential accommodation. Designs that includededicated car spaces, games rooms, laundries, orthe like, and/or excessive floor area that moreresembles residential premises should be avoided.Tourism failureInconsistent standards result in tourists comparingeach other’s facilities, either favourably orunfavourably. If tariffs do not exactly reflectdifferences, complaints arise from irate guests whobelieve that they have not received the same valuefor money as their neighbours.Inconsistent design of units creates managementand fitout problems and encourages ownerparticipation in unit management and maintenance,with consequences as outlined above. Managedconstruction is required to ensure that a viablenumber of units are available when the resortcommences trading, and building activity does notcontinue over an extended period with detrimentalimpacts on guests and the ability of the resort totrade.Units that are residential in nature may not providethe holiday atmosphere provided by units designedfor short-stay and promote an owners perception ofthe unit as a holiday home. The financial return(per m2) on “residential style” units may not be ashigh as “tourist style” units due to higherconstruction costs, which may result in ownerdissatisfaction.116 Tourism Planning Taskforce Report
Page 3 and 4:
1Front cover photographs:1 Yallingu
Page 7 and 8:
GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 10 and 11:
Summary• The rezoning of a touris
Page 12:
Chapter 1Introduction1 Introduction
Page 16 and 17:
Chapter 1Introduction• To identif
Page 18 and 19:
Chapter 2State tourist accommodatio
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Chapter 3Current tourism developmen
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Chapter 4Term of Reference 14 Term
Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 4Term of Reference 1require
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Chapter 5Term of Reference 2framewo
Page 48 and 49:
Chapter 5Term of Reference 2require
Page 50 and 51:
Chapter 5Term of Reference 2a facil
Page 52 and 53:
Chapter 5Term of Reference 2The uni
Page 54 and 55:
Chapter 5Term of Reference 2• Whe
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Chapter 6Term of Reference 3clear t
Page 60 and 61:
Chapter 6Term of Reference 3such de
Page 62 and 63:
Chapter 6Term of Reference 3comply
Page 64 and 65:
Chapter 6Term of Reference 3arrange
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Chapter 7Term of Reference 4Table 1
Page 70 and 71:
Chapter 7Term of Reference 47.3.1 Z
Page 72 and 73:
Chapter 7Term of Reference 4guests
Page 74 and 75:
Chapter 8Taskforce recommendations8
Page 76 and 77: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationsc
Page 78 and 79: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendations-
Page 80 and 81: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationsd
Page 82 and 83: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationss
Page 84 and 85: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationsf
Page 88 and 89: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationsT
Page 90 and 91: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationsT
Page 92 and 93: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationsu
Page 96 and 97: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationso
Page 98 and 99: Chapter 8Taskforce recommendationsR
Page 100 and 101: ReferencesReferencesAustralian Bure
Page 102 and 103: Further readingGetz, Donald (1993)
Page 104 and 105: Further readingWilliams, P., Penros
Page 106 and 107: Appendix 1In the second option, the
Page 108 and 109: Appendix 2Appendix 2List of submitt
Page 110 and 111: Appendix 2Executive Officer*(4) REI
Page 112 and 113: Appendix 33 Responsibility forprepa
Page 114 and 115: Appendix 38 Proposed criteria for t
Page 116 and 117: Appendix 311 Residential componento
Page 118 and 119: Appendix 315 Use of tiered system f
Page 120 and 121: Appendix 319 Managementarrangements
Page 122 and 123: Appendix 322 Land Tax. 7 Support fo
Page 124 and 125: Appendix 327 Review period fortaskf
Page 128 and 129: Appendix 5Unit owners are not able
show all

Tourism Planning Taskforce Report - Western Australian Planning ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?