12.07.2015 Views

Use of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) in Indian Skin Types - ResearchGate

Use of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) in Indian Skin Types - ResearchGate

Use of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) in Indian Skin Types - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Becker’s Naevus – S<strong>in</strong>gle treatments were completely <strong>in</strong>effective, multiple treatments on the thigh <strong>of</strong> one patient weresimilarly <strong>in</strong>effective and one case showed darken<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the naevus at 4 weeks post treatment. This was probably due to thedeep location <strong>of</strong> the pigment.Figure 7—Freckles: Female, age 23 yrs, sk<strong>in</strong> type V, before and one monthafter (two treatments at 2 week <strong>in</strong>tervals us<strong>in</strong>g a fluence <strong>of</strong> 13 J/cm 2 ,triple sub-pulses: 10 ms on, 15 ms <strong>of</strong>f).Figure 8—Melasma: Female, age 30 yrs, sk<strong>in</strong> type IV, before and sevenweeks after (five treatments at weekly <strong>in</strong>tervals us<strong>in</strong>g a fluence <strong>of</strong> 13 J/cm 2 ,triple sub-pulses 10 ms on, 20 ms <strong>of</strong>f.)Figure 9—Melasma: Female age 56 yrs, sk<strong>in</strong> type V, before and after48 weeks (three treatments at 40 day <strong>in</strong>tervals, 12-14 J/cm2,triple sub-pulses 14 ms on, 7 ms <strong>of</strong>f).Figure 10—Melasma Side Effects: Female, age 42 yrs, sk<strong>in</strong> type V, beforeand 4 days post treatment show<strong>in</strong>g typical temporary depigmentationfollow<strong>in</strong>g crust<strong>in</strong>g 13 J/cm 2 , triple sub-pulses: 14 ms on, 7 ms <strong>of</strong>f.No. treatments 1 2 3 4 5 6Becker’s 0.0 - - 0.0 - -(n = 2) - - (n = 1) - -Freckles 0.3 1.2 2.0 1.5 - -(n = 7) (n = 5) (n = 1) (n =2) - -Melasma 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 -(n = 7) (n = 1) (n = 1) (n = 1) (n = 1) -Pigment 0.1 1.0 0.8 2.2 - 0.0(n = 12) (n = 4) (n = 4) (n = 5) - (n = 1)PIH 0.0 - - - 2.0 -(n = 0) - - - (n = 2) -Total scores 0.1 1.1 1.0 1.7 2.0 0.0(n = 30) (n = 10) (n = 6) (n = 9) (n = 3) (n = 1)Table 4—PigmentationAverage treatment grad<strong>in</strong>g scores for pigmentation. 0 = No <strong>Light</strong>en<strong>in</strong>g (25%),2 = Moderate <strong>Light</strong>en<strong>in</strong>g (>50%), 3 = Good <strong>Light</strong>en<strong>in</strong>g (>70%) 4 = Complete Clearance (>90%).7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!