AG STUDY GUIDE FINAL - The Forerunner
AG STUDY GUIDE FINAL - The Forerunner
AG STUDY GUIDE FINAL - The Forerunner
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“Arminianism is ‘natural’ in one sense, in that it represents a characteristic<br />
perversion of Biblical teaching by the fallen mind of man.” ~ J. I. Packer<br />
As we saw earlier, the Synod of Dort sat for six months. After reviewing the written<br />
protests and hearing the arguments, they declared the teaching of Arminius and his<br />
followers out of accord with the Bible and the confessions of the Dutch church. In fact,<br />
they went so far as to label the Remonstrants and their doctrines as a form of the<br />
Pelagian heresy, a label modern Arminians reject as both unfair and unduly harsh.<br />
But was it unfair? First it needs to be understood that as the men who condemned the<br />
Arminian Remonstrants looked across the doctrinal divide they, at times, found<br />
themselves staring into the eyes of men whom they loved and with whom they had<br />
labored. Pastors, professors, students, fathers and sons came down on opposite sides of<br />
the theological fence. <strong>The</strong> final decision by the Synod of Dort was not made in haste, nor<br />
were the Calvinists filled with joy in seeing the Arminians condemned for teaching<br />
error, at best, and heresy, at worst. Repentance was their lofty goal. But as Martin<br />
Luther had declared just a century earlier, their thoughts were captive to the Word of<br />
God. When it came to the Gospel, family and friendships were laid aside.<br />
“My conscience has been taken captive by the Word of God.” ~ Martin Luther<br />
Second, there’s no getting around the fact that the Arminian controversy marked the<br />
beginning of liberalism in the modern church. <strong>The</strong> issue of how a sinner is justified, as<br />
serious as that was, was simply the symptom of a greater disease – the disease of<br />
unbelief that bore itself out in the years following the Synod of Dort.<br />
Dr. Thomas Nettles – <strong>The</strong> doctrines of grace serve as a conserving factor for those<br />
central orthodox and evangelical doctrines that all true Christians hold dear. <strong>The</strong><br />
doctrine of the deity of Christ, the doctrine of the necessity of salvation, the doctrine of<br />
the necessity of the atonement, the doctrine of justification by faith, the inspiration of the<br />
Scripture – all of these things have a much more secure and solid foundation on the<br />
doctrines of grace.<br />
Dr. Philip Schaff confirmed this observation when he wrote:<br />
“…Calvinism represented the consistent, logical, conservative orthodoxy;<br />
Arminianism an elastic, progressive, changing liberalism.” ~ Philip Schaff, <strong>The</strong><br />
Creeds of Christendom, p. 509<br />
But the ultimate reason that the Synod of Dort labeled the Remonstrants as being<br />
184