Submarines and their Weapons - Aircraft of World War II
Submarines and their Weapons - Aircraft of World War II
Submarines and their Weapons - Aircraft of World War II
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AIR-TO-AIR WEAPONS<br />
aim on a target which was taking evasive action from<br />
a fast-flying aircraft whose flight characteristics<br />
caused it to snake at high speed. The answer, <strong>of</strong><br />
course, was to provide a guidance system to control<br />
the missile in flight.<br />
AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES<br />
From as early as 1939, the Henschel company - a<br />
newcomer to aviation, but with a very solid background<br />
in heavy engineering - had maintained a team<br />
whose task was to study the remote control <strong>of</strong><br />
unmanned aircraft. In January 1940, Herbert Wagner<br />
arrived to head the team, with a brief from the RLM<br />
to concentrate on air-to-surf ace missiles (ASMs). He<br />
was successful, as we shall discover, <strong>and</strong> in 1943 the<br />
company proposed a version <strong>of</strong> the Hs 293 ASM he<br />
developed as an air-to-air missile (AAM). Like most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ASMs, the Hs 293H was a blast weapon, to be<br />
guided into a bomber formation <strong>and</strong> exploded there,<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> being aimed at an individual aircraft, <strong>and</strong><br />
had a 295kg (6501b) warhead. One version <strong>of</strong> it was<br />
to have had a television camera in its nose, the picture<br />
it transmitted to the controller allowing him a clear<br />
view at ranges <strong>of</strong> up to about 4km (2.5 miles), but the<br />
apparatus proved very unreliable, <strong>and</strong> the idea, also<br />
tried out on the ASM itself, was shelved. Control was<br />
line-<strong>of</strong>-sight from the launch aircraft, the operator<br />
using a joystick to initiate radio signals which in turn<br />
actuated control surfaces on the missile itself.<br />
This system was to be used in all the German guided<br />
missiles, <strong>and</strong> will be explained more fully below,<br />
in the context <strong>of</strong> the surface-to-air missiles for which<br />
it was originally developed. The missile had both<br />
comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> proximity fuzes as well as a barometric<br />
fuze to ensure that it would self-destruct before it<br />
hit the ground. It was powered by a specially designed<br />
Schmidding rocket which used M-St<strong>of</strong>f (methanol)<br />
<strong>and</strong> A-St<strong>of</strong>f (oxygen), the latter being, unusually, in<br />
gaseous form, to produce 610kg (13401b) <strong>of</strong> static<br />
thrust for 11 seconds. The Hs 293 was too big <strong>and</strong><br />
clumsy for the anti-aircraft role, <strong>and</strong> it comes as no<br />
surprise to discover that after some initial enthusiasm,<br />
the RLM went cold on the idea. By then, however,<br />
Henschel had begun work on the 'Schmetterling' surface-to-air<br />
missile (SAM; see Chapter Eight), <strong>and</strong> had<br />
proposed a version for use in the AAM role.<br />
THE HENSCHEL Hs117H<br />
The Hs 117H, as the variant was known, was very little<br />
different from the basic 'Schmetterling', save that<br />
it required no external booster rockets, but it had a<br />
significantly larger warhead, containing 100kg<br />
(2201b) <strong>of</strong> explosive. It employed the same guidance<br />
system as the Hs 293H. The intended range <strong>of</strong> the Hs<br />
I17H was 6-10km (3.7-6.2 miles), at up to 5000m<br />
(16,500ft) above the 'parent' aircraft, which was a<br />
considerable improvement over the earlier missile. It<br />
was still in development at the war's end, having survived<br />
the axe which descended on so many development<br />
projects in January 1945, it is suggested, simply<br />
because it had so much in common with the ASM<br />
from which it was descended.<br />
Henschel also developed a missile specifically<br />
intended for use in the air-to-air role, the Hs 298, considerably<br />
smaller than either <strong>of</strong> the others <strong>and</strong> with<br />
reduced range. Like them, it had swept-back wings<br />
<strong>and</strong> a tailplane with short fins at its extremities, <strong>and</strong><br />
control was by means <strong>of</strong> solenoid-operated 'Wagner<br />
bars' responding to radio signals. The motor was a<br />
solid-fuel two-stage Schmidding 109-543 which gave<br />
150kg (3301b) <strong>of</strong> thrust for five-<strong>and</strong>-a-half seconds<br />
followed by 50kg (HOlb) <strong>of</strong> thrust for 20 seconds.<br />
The first experimental Hs 298 was fired in May 1944,<br />
<strong>and</strong> altogether some 300 were produced <strong>and</strong> expended<br />
in trials. With a warhead containing either 25kg<br />
(551b) or 48kg (1061b) <strong>of</strong> explosive, detonated on<br />
comm<strong>and</strong> or by a proximity fuze, it had a range <strong>of</strong> up<br />
to 2500m (2735 yards), travelled at either 940km/h<br />
(585mph) or 680km/h (425mph), <strong>and</strong> was designed to<br />
be deployed aboard piston-engined aircraft such as<br />
Do 217s, Fw 190s <strong>and</strong> Ju 88s. Development ceased in<br />
favour <strong>of</strong> the Ruhrstahl X-4 in January 1945.<br />
THE RUHRSTAHL X-4<br />
Ruhrstahl AG was, as its name suggests, a steelmaker.<br />
In 1940 it was ordered to collaborate with Dr Max<br />
Kramer <strong>of</strong> the DVL to develop a series <strong>of</strong> bombs <strong>and</strong><br />
missiles using the spoiler control method the latter<br />
had demonstrated two years earlier. This collaboration<br />
was to result in three very interesting missiles:<br />
the so-called 'Fritz-X' guided glider bomb; the X-7<br />
'Rottkappchen' ('Red Riding Hood') anti-tank missile;<br />
<strong>and</strong> the X-4 air-to-air missile. Development <strong>of</strong><br />
the X-4 began in 1943 in parallel with Henschel's Hs<br />
298. These two missiles had very similar specifications,<br />
though it appears that the X-4 was designed<br />
from the start to operate with jet aircraft, <strong>and</strong> thus<br />
flew at higher speeds. The primary difference<br />
between the X-4 <strong>and</strong> other missiles was that it was<br />
equipped not with wings <strong>and</strong> a tailplane, but with two<br />
sets <strong>of</strong> four fins, one set swept back at an acute angle,<br />
with parallel chord width roughly halfway back from