Intended Use Plan for FY-2012 - Water Resources Board - State of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF Intended Use PlanOklahoma Water Resources BoardAppendix B. July 1, 2011CHART 1. FY 2012 Oklahoma CWSRF Intended Use Projects and Administrative Costs(Beginning July 1, 2011)PART 1. Section 212 Publicly Owned Treatment Works ProjectsTYPE 1 PROJECT NAME/ PROJECT ASSISTANCE 2000 CENSUS DISCHARGE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 2 NEEDS CATEGORIES 3COMMUNITY NUMBER AMOUNT ($) POPULATIONCBOD BOD TSS NH3-N PMin.DO Fecal I II IIIA IIIB IVA IVB VI VII XBINDINGCOMMIT-MENTDATE 4CONSTRUCTSTARTDATE 5INITIATIONOFOPERATION DATE 61 LC Nicoma Park DA ORF-09-0035 160,000 2,415 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND X 08/09/11 10/08/11 04/08/122 LC Muldrow PWA ORF-11-0007 $3,215,000 3,104 30.0 30.0 4.0 X 10/11/11 08/10/10 08/10/113 LC Elgin PWA ORF-10-0005 3,364,000 1,210 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND X X 08/09/11 10/08/11 10/07/124 LC Lone Grove W&ST ORF-04-0011 12,000,000 4,631 10.0 15.0 4.0 5.0 X X X 02/14/12 04/14/12 04/14/145 LC Muskogee UA ORF-11-0008 12,775,000 38,310 30.0 30.0 X 08/13/11 10/12/11 10/11/136 LC Tulsa MUA ORF-11-0005 16,700,000 393,049 10.0 15.0 30.0 3.0 6.0 X 08/09/11 10/08/11 10/07/137 LC Owasso PWA ORF-10-0014 2,940,000 18,502 15.0 30.0 3.0 5.0 X 08/09/11 10/08/11 10/07/128 LC Hydro PWA ORF-12-0001 3,500,000 1,060 30.0 30.0 X 12/13/11 02/11/12 02/10/139 LC Glenpool USA ORF-11-0002 3,750,000 8,123 30.0 90.0 X 08/09/11 10/08/11 10/07/1210 LC Bristow PWA ORF-12-0002 1,050,000 4,325 15.0 30.0 3.0 5.0 X 03/13/12 05/12/12 05/12/1311 LC Tulsa MUA ORF-12-0003 26,472,000 393,049 10.0 15.0 30.0 3.0 6.0 X X X 10/11/11 12/10/11 12/09/1312 LC Wetumka PWA ORF-12-0004 3,500,000 1,451 30.0 90.0 X 02/14/12 04/14/12 04/14/1313 LC Vian PWA ORF-11-0006 1,555,000 1,362 10.0 20.0 15.0 4.0 5.0 X 10/11/11 12/10/11 12/09/1214 LC Altus MA ORF-12-0005 1,951,250 21,447 10.0 15.0 3.5 2.0 X X 04/10/12 06/09/12 06/09/1315 LC Geronimo PWA ORF-12-0006 1,500,000 959 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND X 07/12/11 09/10/11 09/09/1216 LC Hominy PWA ORF-12-0007 600,000 2,584 14.0 30.0 12.0 3.0 X 01/10/12 03/10/12 03/10/1317 LC Sperry USA ORF-12-0008 443,900 1,645 30.0 90.0 X 03/13/12 05/12/12 11/11/1218 LC Norman UA ORF-12-0009 26,000,000 95,694 13.0 30.0 30.0 4.5 5.0 X 01/10/12 03/10/12 03/10/1419 LC Tuttle PWA ORF-12-0010 2,000,000 4,294 30.0 90.0 X X 12/13/11 02/11/12 02/10/1320 LC McLoud PWA ORF-12-0011 $1,750,000 3,548 30.0 30.0 X 05/08/12 07/07/12 07/07/1321 LC Broken Arrow MA ORF-12-0012 $4,000,000 74,859 30.0 30.0 X 03/13/12 05/12/12 05/12/1422 LC Durant CUA ORF-12-0013 1,025,000 13,549 10.0 15.0 2.0 5.0 X 04/10/12 06/09/12 06/09/13Total--212 $130,251,150PART 2. Section 319 Nonpoint Source Mgmt. ProjectsTotal-- NPS Cat. VII $0PART 3. Section 320 Estuary Program ProjectsTotal-- No Estuaries $0PART 4. CWSRF Program Administrative CostsTotal-- 4% Program Admin. Fees Banked $500,000TOTAL PARTS 1 through 4 $130,751,1501R = Refinancing LC = Long-term Construction Loan HG = Hardship Grant NC = Non-construction GPR = Green Project Reserve2ND = No Discharge NA = Not Applicable A = Administrative Cost3I = Secondary Treatment, II = Advanced Treatment, IIIA = Inflow/Infiltration Correction, IIIB = Major Sewer System Rehab.,IVA = New Collection System, IVB = New Interceptor, VI = Urban Stormwater, Nonpoint source pollution control activities,X = Conveyance of Recycled Water4 "Binding Commitment Date" is target date for OWRB board approval and commitment of funds (prior to loan closing).5 Estimated based on assumption that construction start is 60 days following Binding Commitment Date.6 Construction time estimated based on cost of project: $3.5 million = 8 quarters or 730 days.Appx. B-1
FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF Intended Use PlanOklahoma Water Resources BoardJuly 1, 2011Chart 2. Projected Environmental Benefits for Proposed FY 12 CWSRF Loans Page 1 of 2PROJECT Nicoma Park DA Muldrow PWA Elgin PWA Lone Grove W&ST Muskogee UA Tulsa MUA Owasso PWA Hydro PWA Glenpool USA Bristow PWA Tulsa MUAProject Number ORF-09-0035 ORF-11-0007 ORF-10-0005 ORF-04-0011 ORF-11-0008 ORF-11-0005 ORF-10-0014 ORF-12-0001 ORF-11-0002 ORF-12-0002 ORF-12-0003Binding Commitment Year 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012Population 2,415 3,104 1,210 4,631 38,310 393,049 18,502 1,060 8,123 4,325 393,049Assistance Amount Total $160,000 $3,215,000 $3,364,000 $12,000,000 $12,775,000 $16,700,000 $2,940,000 $3,750,000 $3,750,000 $1,050,000 $26,472,000Category I $1,682,000 $16,700,000 $3,750,000 $14,087,000Category II $3,215,000 $4,000,000 $3,750,000 $1,050,000Category IIIA $1,685,000Category IIIB $1,682,000 $4,000,000 $12,775,000 $10,700,000Category IVA $160,000Category IVB $4,000,000 $2,940,000Category VICategory VIICategory XWaterbody nameChoctaw Cr. (throughChoctaw Facility)Poague Branch, Little SkinBayou Trib to Ninemile Beaver Ck Untrib, Hickory Ck. Arkansas R. Arkansas R. & Bird Ck Skeleton Cr.Unnamed Ck Trib to DeerCk Coal Ck. Little Deep Fork Ck. Arkansas R. & Bird CkAffected Waterbody I.D. ok 520520000030 ok 220200 ok 311210000130 ok 311100020010 ok 120400010260ok120420010010ok121300010010 ok 620910030240 ok 520620060010 ok 120420020030 ok 520700060130ok120420010010ok121300010010PROJECT TYPEFACTORConsent Order orEnforceable NPDES Permit X X X X X X XEliminate or reducedocumented health threat orNPDES violation withinwatershed that is a watersupply X X X X X X X XEliminate or reducedocumented health threat orNPDES violationAll other projects sustainingor reducing current degree oftreatment, increasingcapacity, reliability, orefficiency, reclaim/reusewater, or reduce documentedwater quality threat X X XWATER QUALITYRESTORATIONFACTORAffects 303d listed stream X X X X XTop-ten NPS PriorityWatershed X XProject implements waterquality plan X X X X X XWATER QUALITYPROTECTION FACTORAppendix A waterOutstandingResource WaterHigh Quality WaterSensitive WaterSupplyXScenic RiverCultural SignificanceAppendix B waterWaters withrecreational and/orecological X X X X X X X X X XSource waterprotection areaGroundwater vulnerabilityLow X X X X X XModerateXHigh Quality WaterVery High X X X X X X* Approximated CostBreakoutAppx. B-2
Page 1 and 2: CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDINT
Page 3 and 4: ContentsLetters of Support.........
Page 5 and 6: MARY FALLINGOVERNORJ.D. STRONGEXECU
Page 7 and 8: J.D. STRONGEXECUTIVE DIRECTORmARY F
Page 9 and 10: OCWP Community Impact Measure Proje
Page 11 and 12: Proposed FY 2012 Projects (Clean Wa
Page 13 and 14: practices, water reuse and sustaina
Page 15 and 16: to ensure that an Entity is meeting
Page 17 and 18: Clean Water SRF Activities to Be Su
Page 19 and 20: 602(b)(4) Expeditious and Timely Ex
Page 21 and 22: Transfer Authority Between Clean Wa
Page 23 and 24: The funds are restricted by several
Page 25 and 26: Fundable ListFiscal Year 2012Oklaho
Page 27 and 28: Oklahoma Water Resources BoardClean
Page 29 and 30: ance Programecipient Statusved as o
Page 31: FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF In
Page 35 and 36: FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF In
Page 37 and 38: FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF In
Page 39 and 40: FY 2012 Oklahoma CWSRF Intended Use
Page 41 and 42: FY 2012 Oklahoma CWSRF Intended Use
Page 43 and 44: ATTACHMENT 22010 Clean Water and Dr
Page 45 and 46: PART A - CWSRF GPR SPECIFIC GUIDANC
Page 47 and 48: CWSRF Technical GuidanceThe followi
Page 49 and 50: 1.4-5 Design criteria are available
Page 51 and 52: 3.2-2 Projects that achieve a 20% r
Page 53 and 54: 4.2-5b All building costs are eligi
Page 55 and 56: 4.5-7 Projects that achieve the goa
Page 57 and 58: ORF-000Rev-05/10Oklahoma Clean Wate
Page 59 and 60: 2. Water Efficiency Components:Defi
Page 61 and 62: Total Present worth Cost Analysis C
Page 63 and 64: System‐WideTOTALS680,022$639,220.
Page 65 and 66: • Where appropriate for energy ef
Page 68 and 69: as of June 27, 2011Oklahoma SAAP Gr
Page 70: AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks to O

Intended Use Plan for FY-2012 - Water Resources Board - State of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?