Intended Use Plan for FY-2012 - Water Resources Board - State of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Sample calculation for energy and cost savings for SCADA control:(Attachment-2)Project#LS #kWhConsumptionfor CurrentRun Times/yrEnergyCost/yrExcessive kWhConsumption/yrkWhConsumption/yrafter SCADAEnergyCost/yrCostSavingsEnergySavingsEligibleCostsE1 20 111,521$104,829.747,806 103,715$97,491.66$7,338.087% $4,500.00EfficiencyCalc:E4 48 50,093$47,087.421,503 48,590$45,674.80$1,412.623% $4,500.00Sub 182 3,335$3,134.90200 3,135$2,946.81$188.096% $4,500.00(Total RunHours ‐Excess RunHours)/TotalRun Hours109 35,292$33,174.48706 34,586$32,510.99$663.492% $4,500.00Sub 4 17 4,792$4,504.48144 4,648$4,369.35$135.133% $4,500.00Sub 5 27 15,570$14,635.801,246 14,324$13,464.94$1,170.868% $4,500.00Sub 6 64 170,718$160,474.928,536 162,182$152,451.17$8,023.755% $4,500.00Sub 8 8 113,280$106,483.203,398 109,882$103,288.70$3,194.503% $4,500.0049 24,749$23,264.06990 23,759$22,333.50$930.564% $4,500.00Sub 961 27,59474 6,693$25,938.36$6,291.421,656 25,93867 6,626$24,382.06$6,228.51$1,556.30$62.916% $4,500.001% $4,500.0076 27,213$25,580.22816 26,397$24,812.81$767.413% $4,500.00Sub 9b 68 39,127$36,779.382,739 36,388$34,204.82$2,574.567% $4,500.0034 18,015$16,934.101,081 16,934$15,918.05$1,016.056% $4,500.00Sub 1136 19,590$18,414.601,763 17,827$16,757.29$1,657.319% $4,500.0042 12,440$11,693.60871 11,569$10,875.05$818.557% $4,500.00
System‐WideTOTALS680,022$639,220.6847,602 632,420$607,710.50$31,510.187% $72,000.00LS #TotalRunHoursExcess RunHours% Excess20 7708 572.1 7%48 4645 154 3%82 1967.8 119 6%109 4961.5 78 2%NOTES:17 584.3 15.9 3%27 2574.8 207.5 8%64 4984.2 234.2 5%8 3022.4 87.1 3%49 4419.6 173.1 4%61 3986.9 229.4 6%74 790.6 6.4 1%76 5407.5 169.6 3%68 2923.1 211.9 7%34 6837.3 411.8 6%36 4058.2 356.2 9%42 4069.2 283.5 7%Project specs call for SCADA units to consistof:Siemens Intralink LC150 (orsimilar)MDS iNET900 Data TransmissionUnitEstimate cost per SCADA unit = $4,500 per correspondencefrom local Distributor(Municipal Pump & Control)
Page 1 and 2:
CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDINT
Page 3 and 4:
ContentsLetters of Support.........
Page 5 and 6:
MARY FALLINGOVERNORJ.D. STRONGEXECU
Page 7 and 8:
J.D. STRONGEXECUTIVE DIRECTORmARY F
Page 9 and 10:
OCWP Community Impact Measure Proje
Page 11 and 12: Proposed FY 2012 Projects (Clean Wa
Page 13 and 14: practices, water reuse and sustaina
Page 15 and 16: to ensure that an Entity is meeting
Page 17 and 18: Clean Water SRF Activities to Be Su
Page 19 and 20: 602(b)(4) Expeditious and Timely Ex
Page 21 and 22: Transfer Authority Between Clean Wa
Page 23 and 24: The funds are restricted by several
Page 25 and 26: Fundable ListFiscal Year 2012Oklaho
Page 27 and 28: Oklahoma Water Resources BoardClean
Page 29 and 30: ance Programecipient Statusved as o
Page 31 and 32: FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF In
Page 39 and 40: FY 2012 Oklahoma CWSRF Intended Use
Page 41 and 42: FY 2012 Oklahoma CWSRF Intended Use
Page 43 and 44: ATTACHMENT 22010 Clean Water and Dr
Page 45 and 46: PART A - CWSRF GPR SPECIFIC GUIDANC
Page 47 and 48: CWSRF Technical GuidanceThe followi
Page 49 and 50: 1.4-5 Design criteria are available
Page 51 and 52: 3.2-2 Projects that achieve a 20% r
Page 53 and 54: 4.2-5b All building costs are eligi
Page 55 and 56: 4.5-7 Projects that achieve the goa
Page 57 and 58: ORF-000Rev-05/10Oklahoma Clean Wate
Page 59 and 60: 2. Water Efficiency Components:Defi
Page 61: Total Present worth Cost Analysis C
Page 65 and 66: • Where appropriate for energy ef
Page 68 and 69: as of June 27, 2011Oklahoma SAAP Gr
Page 70: AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks to O
show all

Intended Use Plan for FY-2012 - Water Resources Board - State of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?