Intended Use Plan for FY-2012 - Water Resources Board - State of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF Intended Use PlanOklahoma Water Resources BoardJuly 1, 2011Chart 2. Projected Environmental Benefits for Proposed FY 12 CWSRF Loans Page 2 of 2PROJECT Wetumka PWA Vian PWA Altus MA Geronimo PWA Hominy PWA Sperry USA Norman UA Tuttle PWA McLoud PWA Broken Arrow MA Durant CUAProject Number ORF-12-0004 ORF-11-0006 ORF-12-0005 ORF-12-0006 ORF-12-0007 ORF-12-0008 ORF-12-0009 ORF-12-0010 ORF-12-0011 ORF-12-0012 ORF-12-0013Binding Commitment Year 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012Population 1,451 1,362 21,447 959 2,584 1,645 95,694 4,294 3,548 74,859 13,549Assistance Amount Total $3,500,000 $1,555,000 $1,951,250 $1,500,000 $600,000 $443,900 $26,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,750,000 $4,000,000 $1,025,000Category I $3,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,025,000Category II $1,555,000 $1,500,000 $600,000 $26,000,000Category IIIACategory IIIB $1,500,000 $4,000,000Category IVA $443,900 $1,750,000Category IVB $500,000Category VICategory VIICategory X $451,250Waterbody name Untrib, Wewoka Ck. Vain Ck. Trib of Stinking Ck.Unnamed Trib to EastCache Ck Penn Ck. Hominy Ck Canadian R. West Ck. N. Canadian R. Arkansas R. Caney Ck.Affected Waterbody I.D. ok 520500020010 ok220200020130_10 ok 311500 ok311300 ok 121300040290 ok 121300040010 ok 520310010010 ok 520610020090 ok 520510000110 ok 1204410010080 ok 410700000100PROJECT TYPEFACTORConsent Order orEnforceable NPDES PermitSchedule X X X XEliminate or reducedocumented health threat orNPDES violation withinwatershed that is a watersupply X XEliminate or reducedocumented health threat orNPDES violation X XAll other projects sustainingor reducing current degree oftreatment, increasingcapacity, reliability, orefficiency, reclaim/reusewater, or reduce documentedwater quality threat X X X X X XWATER QUALITYRESTORATIONFACTORAffects 303d listed stream X X X X XTop-ten NPS PriorityWatershedProject implements waterquality planXWATER QUALITYPROTECTION FACTORAppendix A waterOutstanding ResourceWaterHigh Quality WaterSensitive WaterSupplyScenic RiverCultural SignificanceAppendix B waterrecreational and/orecologicalsignificance X X X X X X X XSource waterprotection areaGroundwater vulnerabilityLow X X XModerateXHigh Quality WaterVery High X X X X X X X* Approximated Cost BreakoutAppx. B-2
FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF Intended Use PlanOklahoma Water Resources BoardJuly 1, 2011CHART 3. Binding Commitment Requirements with Respect to Federal Payments by Federal Fiscal Quarter(Beginning July 1, 2011)This table lists "select binding commitments," those wastewater construction projects that meet the requirements of the federal capitalization grant, including all federalcrosscutting laws and authorities. These projects may receive loan proceeds from any source within the CWSRF, including capitalization grant/State matching funds, bond funds, or"2nd round" funds (loan repayments). Refinancing loans are not included on this table.BINDINGPROJECTPROJECT NAME/COMMUNITY SERVEDCOMMITMENT Federal FY 2011 Federal FY 2012TOTALSNUMBERDATEQTR 4 QTR 1 QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4Tulsa MUA ORF-11-0005 08/09/11 16,700 16,700Owasso PWA ORF-10-0014 08/09/11 2,940 2,940Muskogee UA ORF-11-0008 08/13/11 12,775 12,775Tulsa MUA ORF-12-0003 10/11/11 26,472 26,472Altus MA ORF-12-0005 04/10/12 1,951 1,951Norman UA ORF-12-0009 01/10/12 26,000 26,000Broken Arrow MA ORF-12-0012 03/13/12 4,000 4,000Durant CUA ORF-12-0013 04/10/12 1,025 1,025Capitalization Grant Administration N/A N/A 250 250 250 250 250 1,250(1) Annual Select Binding Commitment Totals 32,665 26,722 30,250 3,226 250 93,113(2) Cumulative Binding Commitment Totals 1 907,631 940,296 967,018 997,268 1,000,494 1,000,744(3) Fiscal Year Select Binding Commitment Totals 32,665 N/A N/A N/A 60,448(4) CAP Grant Award & State Match 6,584 6,584 6,584 0 0 19,752(5) Cumulative Required Binding Commitment Totals 320,682 327,266 333,850 340,434 340,434 340,434(6) Binding Commitment Totals as a Percentage of RequiredBinding Commitment Totals283.0% 287.3% 289.7% 292.9% 293.9% 294.0%1 ProjectionsAppx. B-3
Page 1 and 2: CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDINT
Page 3 and 4: ContentsLetters of Support.........
Page 5 and 6: MARY FALLINGOVERNORJ.D. STRONGEXECU
Page 7 and 8: J.D. STRONGEXECUTIVE DIRECTORmARY F
Page 9 and 10: OCWP Community Impact Measure Proje
Page 11 and 12: Proposed FY 2012 Projects (Clean Wa
Page 13 and 14: practices, water reuse and sustaina
Page 15 and 16: to ensure that an Entity is meeting
Page 17 and 18: Clean Water SRF Activities to Be Su
Page 19 and 20: 602(b)(4) Expeditious and Timely Ex
Page 21 and 22: Transfer Authority Between Clean Wa
Page 23 and 24: The funds are restricted by several
Page 25 and 26: Fundable ListFiscal Year 2012Oklaho
Page 27 and 28: Oklahoma Water Resources BoardClean
Page 29 and 30: ance Programecipient Statusved as o
Page 31 and 32: FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF In
Page 33: FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF In
Page 37 and 38: FY 2012 Oklahoma Clean Water SRF In
Page 39 and 40: FY 2012 Oklahoma CWSRF Intended Use
Page 41 and 42: FY 2012 Oklahoma CWSRF Intended Use
Page 43 and 44: ATTACHMENT 22010 Clean Water and Dr
Page 45 and 46: PART A - CWSRF GPR SPECIFIC GUIDANC
Page 47 and 48: CWSRF Technical GuidanceThe followi
Page 49 and 50: 1.4-5 Design criteria are available
Page 51 and 52: 3.2-2 Projects that achieve a 20% r
Page 53 and 54: 4.2-5b All building costs are eligi
Page 55 and 56: 4.5-7 Projects that achieve the goa
Page 57 and 58: ORF-000Rev-05/10Oklahoma Clean Wate
Page 59 and 60: 2. Water Efficiency Components:Defi
Page 61 and 62: Total Present worth Cost Analysis C
Page 63 and 64: System‐WideTOTALS680,022$639,220.
Page 65 and 66: • Where appropriate for energy ef
Page 68 and 69: as of June 27, 2011Oklahoma SAAP Gr
Page 70: AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks to O

Intended Use Plan for FY-2012 - Water Resources Board - State of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?